- Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 21 January 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 28 January 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it distinguishes between the start of a community service order induction period and the start of the work to be carried out in official monitoring records.
Answer
Normal practice is for time spent by an offender on induction to count towards the total number of hours specified by the court as constituting the community service order.
- Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 21 January 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 28 January 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive what percentage of community service orders begins (a) within seven days, (b) between eight and 14 days, (c) between 15 and 21 days, (d) between 22 and 28 days, (e) between 29 days and two months, (f) more than two and up to six months and (g) more than six months after sentencing, broken down by local authority.
Answer
This information is not held centrally. The National Objectives and Standards for Social Work Services in the Criminal Justice System, which are currently being revised, will require offenders sentenced to community service to commence work within seven working days of the order being imposed by the court in most circumstances.
To measure the impact of the additional £1 million funding being made available to Community Justice Authorities from 2009-10, for the delivery of speedier and more immediate community penalties, it is intended to carry out an early audit of current timescales for the start of placements and to repeat the exercise 12 months later.
- Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 21 January 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 28 January 2009
To ask the Scottish Executivewhat percentage of orders commences (a) immediately, (b) within seven days, (c) eight to 14 days, (d) 15 to 21 days, (e) 22 to 28 days, (f) 29 days to two months, (g) more than two and up to six months and (h) more than six months after completion of a health and safety induction, broken down by local authority.
Answer
The information requested is not held centrally. I refer to the answer to question S3W-20017 on 28 January 2009. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament''s website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/Apps2/Business/PQA/Default.aspx.
- Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 19 January 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 27 January 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will ensure that local authorities and NHS boards record and share information on the number of people with autism.
Answer
The Scottish Government published guidance for commissioners of health and social care services in 2008 recommending that local authorities and health boards should work together to identify and keep a record of people on the autism spectrum in their area. The eSAY project has been developed to ensure information about people with learning disabilities or autism spectrum disorders is recorded and measured in the same way across Scotland.
- Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 23 December 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 26 January 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has power to intervene in the proposed closure of Parkhead fire station and, if so, whether it intends to.
Answer
Primary responsibility for setting fire cover lies with Strathclyde Joint Fire Board. Under section 45 (1) of the Fire (Scotland) Act 2005 ministers may make a property and facilities order in circumstances where they consider it necessary for public safety purposes. Such an order may be used to give general or specific directions to a fire and rescue authority in respect of the use of property and/or facilities. Scottish ministers would only exercise their discretionary powers to intervene if it was clear that action by them was warranted in line with the statutory tests. Ministers currently have no plans to intervene in respect of Parkhead fire station.
- Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Saturday, 05 January 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Frank Mulholland on 19 January 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether there are directions from the Lord Advocate on the prosecution of child-care staff.
Answer
Guidance is available for Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service staff in relation to the prosecution of teaching staff as well as cases more generally where criminal offences are committed by those in a position of trust and cases where persons claim to have carried out physical punishment of children in the exercise of a parental right or of a right derived from having charge or care of a child. General guidance on the criteria for decision making and the range of options available to prosecutors dealing with reports is published in the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Prosecution Code.
- Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Saturday, 05 January 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 15 January 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will establish a widening access unit to improve university uptake rates from across the social spectrum.
Answer
There are currently no plans to establish a widening access unit to improve university uptake rates.
The Scottish Funding Council (SFC) has lead responsibility for promoting widening access through its own activities, the four regional widening access forums and higher education institutions. In 2008, the SFC strengthened its commitment to widening participation by the establishment of an Access and Inclusion Committee to raise the profile of this activity. The Scottish Government welcomes the establishment of this committee and will continue to work closely with the SFC to promote widening access.
- Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Saturday, 05 January 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Maxwell on 15 January 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive what action it intends to take to tackle alleged problems of gross overcrowding and abuse of housing protections in the Govanhill area of Glasgow.
Answer
Local authorities have powers to identify issues of overcrowding under the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987. To help address overcrowding, local authorities and registered social landlords are required to give reasonable preference in the allocation of their housing to those people living in overcrowded houses or those with large families. They also have responsibility for ensuring that houses in multiple occupation are licensed and that licensing conditions, including those relating to maximum occupancy, are complied with. Local authorities have a range of powers to deal with issues of poor housing quality and the landlord registration provisions allow them to refuse registration to those people who are not fit and proper to let houses.
The Scottish Government strongly encourages local authorities to make full use of all of the powers at their disposal.
- Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Saturday, 05 January 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Maxwell on 15 January 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will empower local authorities or other agencies as well as tenants to make complaints to the Private Rented Housing Panel.
Answer
The Housing (Scotland) Act 2006 makes it clear that the Private Rented Housing Panel (PRHP) deals with complaints on repairing standard issues from tenants only. This Standard, which was introduced by the 2006 act, updated the landlord''s repairing obligations in the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987. Those obligations could be enforced only by tenants taking court action. The PRHP was established to make it easier for tenants to seek redress.
As the Policy Memorandum for the Housing (Scotland) Bill explained in 2005, the possibility of having the repairing standard enforced directly against landlords by local authorities or an equivalent agency was considered. This would have been on the model of a local authority taking direct action on houses below the tolerable standard or in serious disrepair, by serving a statutory notice. However it was decided that the underlying principle of the 2006 act, that the householder should have prime responsibility for his or her housing conditions, should apply. The intention was to strengthen the existing mechanism for tenants to act on repair issues, rather than replace it with additional direct regulation by local authorities or other agencies. Since the idea of local authorities directly enforcing the repairing standard has been rejected, it would not be appropriate for local authorities to have the power to complain to a tribunal about breaches of the standard.
Local authorities already have powers to take direct action on sub-standard houses, the condition of which may also constitute breaches of some requirements of the repairing standard. These powers will be strengthened by the implementation of other provisions in the 2006 act. Local authorities also have an important role in informing tenants about their right to complain to the PRHP, advising them how to go about making a complaint, and, if necessary, assisting them to do so. The Scottish Government strongly encourages local authorities to provide such advice and assistance.
We therefore have no plans to allow anyone other than tenants to apply to the PRHP.
- Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Saturday, 05 January 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 15 January 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive what the highest number of prisoners was in each prison in each of the last three months.
Answer
I have asked Mike Ewart, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:
The following table illustrates the maximum daily population for each establishment in each of the last three months.
Max of Actual Population Each Month | Month |
October | November | December |
Aberdeen | 266 | 252 | 232 |
Addiewell | 0 | 0 | 80 |
Barlinnie | 1690 | 1682 | 1660 |
Cornton Vale | 437 | 428 | 410 |
Dumfries | 222 | 220 | 217 |
Edinburgh | 902 | 895 | 875 |
Glenochil Prison | 759 | 753 | 756 |
Greenock | 346 | 340 | 340 |
Inverness | 159 | 163 | 163 |
Kilmarnock | 652 | 651 | 650 |
Open Estate | 309 | 313 | 342 |
Perth | 808 | 800 | 757 |
Peterhead | 306 | 306 | 306 |
Polmont | 718 | 725 | 710 |
Shotts | 549 | 549 | 545 |