Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Questions and answers

Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for MSPs to get factual and statistical information.

  • Written questions must be answered within 10 working days (20 working days during recess)
  • Other questions such as Topical, Portfolio, General and First Minister's Question Times are taken in the Chamber

Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search.  There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.

Find out more about parliamentary questions

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 7 June 2025
Answer status
Question type

Displaying 1531 questions Show Answers

|

Question reference: S3W-37726

  • Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
  • Date lodged: Monday, 22 November 2010
  • Current Status: Answered by Fergus Ewing on 2 December 2010

To ask the Scottish Executive how many people convicted of possessing ecstasy received (a) a custodial sentence, (b) a community sentence order, (c) a probation order, (d) a drug treatment and testing order, (e) a fine or (f) another disposal in (i) 2008-09 and (ii) 2009-10, broken down by police force area.

Question reference: S3W-37725

  • Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
  • Date lodged: Monday, 22 November 2010
  • Current Status: Answered by Fergus Ewing on 2 December 2010

To ask the Scottish Executive how many people convicted of possessing cocaine received (a) a custodial sentence, (b) a community sentence order, (c) a probation order, (d) a drug treatment and testing order, (e) a fine or (f) another disposal in (i) 2008-09 and (ii) 2009-10, broken down by police force area.

Question reference: S3W-37724

  • Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
  • Date lodged: Monday, 22 November 2010
  • Current Status: Answered by Fergus Ewing on 2 December 2010

To ask the Scottish Executive how many people have been convicted of possession of illegal drugs in (a) 2008-09 and (b) 2009-10, broken down by (i) police force area and (ii) type of drug.

Question reference: S3W-37728

  • Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
  • Date lodged: Monday, 22 November 2010
  • Current Status: Answered by Fergus Ewing on 2 December 2010

To ask the Scottish Executive how many people convicted of possessing amphetamines received (a) a custodial sentence, (b) a community sentence order, (c) a probation order, (d) a drug treatment and testing order, (e) a fine or (f) another disposal in (i) 2008-09 and (ii) 2009-10, broken down by police force area.

Question reference: S3W-37729

  • Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
  • Date lodged: Monday, 22 November 2010
  • Current Status: Answered by Fergus Ewing on 2 December 2010

To ask the Scottish Executive how many people convicted of possessing cannabis received (a) a custodial sentence, (b) a community sentence order, (c) a probation order, (d) a drug treatment and testing order, (e) a fine or (f) another disposal in (i) 2008-09 and (ii) 2009-10, broken down by police force area.

Question reference: S3W-37745

  • Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
  • Date lodged: Monday, 22 November 2010
  • Current Status: Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 1 December 2010

To ask the Scottish Executive what consideration it will give to the access to justice requirements of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters when replacing the current tests of title and interest with a single and simpler test of sufficient interest, as stated in its response to the Report of the Scottish Civil Courts Review.

Question reference: S3W-37741

  • Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
  • Date lodged: Monday, 22 November 2010
  • Current Status: Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 1 December 2010

To ask the Scottish Executive what preparation the Court of Session Rules Council is making regarding new rules governing the award of protective cost orders in environmental cases, following the Scottish Government’s response to the Report of the Scottish Civil Courts Review.

Question reference: S3W-37743

  • Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
  • Date lodged: Monday, 22 November 2010
  • Current Status: Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 1 December 2010

To ask the Scottish Executive whether the Court of Session Rules Council will take account of the recent decision of the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee regarding protective cost orders in environmental cases in its consideration of new rules governing the award of such orders.

Question reference: S3W-37742

  • Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
  • Date lodged: Monday, 22 November 2010
  • Current Status: Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 1 December 2010

To ask the Scottish Executive when it expects the Court of Session Rules Council to promulgate new rules governing the award of protective cost orders in environmental cases.

Question reference: S3W-37747

  • Asked by: Robert Brown, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Liberal Democrats
  • Date lodged: Monday, 22 November 2010
  • Current Status: Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 1 December 2010

To ask the Scottish Executive what consideration it will give to the timely access to justice requirements of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters when introducing a time limit to bring a case as stated in its response to the Report of the Scottish Civil Courts Review.