- Asked by: Phil Gallie, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 17 June 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 25 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what the cost has been to Scottish Natural Heritage of the cull on the Uists and Benbecula.
Answer
This is a matter for Scottish Natural Heritage. The Information requested is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Phil Gallie, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 02 June 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 20 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what assessment it has made of the economic impact of any discriminatory action being taken by the Traffic Commissioner for Scotland against Trans Consult in Edinburgh.
Answer
None. The functions of the Traffic Commissioners for the Scottish Traffic Area in relation to freight are reserved.
- Asked by: Phil Gallie, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 02 June 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 20 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what powers it has in respect of economic development to support firms in securing fair treatment from bodies and offices such as the Traffic Commissioner for Scotland.
Answer
The Scottish Executive has no such powers.
- Asked by: Phil Gallie, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 19 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 6 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the judgement by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Fawcett v McRoberts contravenes section 2(3) of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995 and, if so, what steps it is taking to protect the interests of Scottish children and parents with contact rights.
Answer
The Children (Scotland) Act 1995 does not form part of the law of the USA. However, the Scottish Executive shares the concerns expressed about the effect of this appeal judgement having regard to the terms of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, to which both the UK and US are parties.
- Asked by: Phil Gallie, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 19 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 6 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what its position is on the situation of Scottish parents whose children have been abducted to the United States of America and for whom no legal aid support can be offered to defend court actions initiated there.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S2W-240 today. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa.
- Asked by: Phil Gallie, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 19 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 6 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what its position is on the implications of the judgement by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Fawcett v McRoberts that it is acceptable within the law for a Scottish child to be taken to reside in the United States of America by a parent with residence rights and without the consent of a parent with contact rights or Scottish court approval.
Answer
The Scottish Executive is aware of this appeal decision. The case arose following an abduction to the USA from Scotland following which the Scottish child was ordered to be returned to Scotland under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980. An appeal against this was allowed on grounds which have given rise to concern. The appeal court has since denied an application from the Scottish mother against this appeal judgment.The Scottish Executive shares the concerns about the terms of this appeal judgment and, as Central Authority in Scotland under the Hague Convention, is doing all it properly can to support the efforts of the Scottish mother and her attorney in the USA.Normally, when an application is submitted under the Hague Convention, the requested state will arrange for the applicant to receive cost free legal and administrative advice and assistance. The United States has, however, made a reservation to this and so when an application is submitted to the USA the Central Authority in the USA will arrange for pro bono representation for the applicant. I understand it can become more difficult to secure pro bono assistance when appeals are made. Scottish Legal Aid can only be made available for proceedings in the Scottish courts and does not cover proceedings raised in the USA or other countries.
- Asked by: Phil Gallie, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 19 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 6 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what steps it will take to secure the interest of Scottish parents in circumstances such as the repeated process of appeal used by the appellant in the case of Fawcett v McRoberts in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit which created substantial demands on pro bono representation in the United States of America.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S2W-00240. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa.
- Asked by: Phil Gallie, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 13 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 3 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what decision-making powers and responsibilities it would lose under the current European Union proposals on better market access to environmental services.
Answer
The Scottish Executive will not lose decision-making powers or responsibilities In respect of environmental services with regard to the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS).The regulation of international trade is a reserved matter and as such the UK Government takes the lead. However, the Scottish Executive maintains close contact with DTI and other UK Government Departments on trade issues, including GATS, and how they may impact on the Executive's responsibilities.
- Asked by: Phil Gallie, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 3 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive how many prisms were dispensed through Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board and, of these, how many were dispensed by each registered optician in the board's area in each year since 1996.
Answer
The number of optical vouchers with supplements for prisms paid in respect of Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board area for the financial years 1997 to 2003 is shown in table 1. A robust estimate is not available for 1996. The number of optical voucher with supplements for prisms paid in respect of each ophthalmic dispenser in the board's area for the year 2003 is shown in table 2. Information for previous years is not available.Table 1
Year | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 |
Number of Prism Supplements Paid | 590 | 537 | 563 | 515 | 563 | 611 | 477 |
Note:For year ending 31 March.Table 2
Ophthalmic Dispenser | Number of Prism Supplements Paid |
1 | Nil |
2 | 10 |
3 | 11 |
4 | 6 |
5 | 13 |
6 | 7 |
7 | 7 |
8 | 1 |
9 | 1 |
10 | 2 |
11 | 1 |
12 | 2 |
13 | 16 |
14 | 6 |
15 | Nil |
16 | 2 |
17 | Nil |
18 | 6 |
19 | 5 |
20 | 4 |
21 | 7 |
22 | 5 |
23 | 3 |
24 | 11 |
25 | 16 |
26 | 2 |
27 | 8 |
28 | 5 |
29 | 6 |
30 | 5 |
31 | 7 |
32 | 7 |
33 | 48 |
34 | 7 |
35 | 9 |
36 | Nil |
37 | 7 |
38 | 3 |
39 | 33 |
40 | 48 |
41 | 14 |
42 | 22 |
43 | 6 |
44 | 8 |
45 | 3 |
46 | 14 |
47 | 1 |
48 | 5 |
49 | Nil |
50 | Nil |
51 | Nil |
52 | 4 |
53 | 6 |
54 | Nil |
55 | 1 |
56 | 49 |
57 | 2 |
58 | 5 |
59 | Nil |
60 | Nil |
61 | Nil |
Total | 477 |
Notes:For year ending 31 March 2003.In line with data protection principles, the data have been anonymised.
- Asked by: Phil Gallie, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 3 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive how many supplements for children's spectacle frames were claimed through Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board and, of these, how many were claimed by each registered optician in the board's area in each year since 1996.
Answer
The number of optical vouchers with supplements for small glasses paid in respect of Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board area for the financial years 1997 to 2003 is shown in table 1. A robust estimate is not available for 1996. The number of optical vouchers with supplements for small glasses paid in respect of each ophthalmic dispenser in the board's area is shown in table 2. Information for previous years is not available.Table 1
Year | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 |
Number of Small Glasses Supplements Paid | 105 | 99 | 118 | 53 | 44 | 24 | 24 |
Note:For year ending 31 March.Table 2
Ophthalmic Dispenser | Number of Small Glasses Supplements Paid |
1 | Nil |
2 | 1 |
3 | 2 |
4 | 1 |
5 | 1 |
6 | Nil |
7 | 1 |
8 | Nil |
9 | Nil |
10 | Nil |
11 | Nil |
12 | Nil |
13 | 1 |
14 | Nil |
15 | 1 |
16 | Nil |
17 | Nil |
18 | Nil |
19 | Nil |
20 | Nil |
21 | 1 |
22 | 1 |
23 | 1 |
24 | Nil |
25 | Nil |
26 | Nil |
27 | 4 |
28 | Nil |
29 | 1 |
30 | Nil |
31 | Nil |
32 | Nil |
33 | Nil |
34 | Nil |
35 | 4 |
36 | Nil |
37 | Nil |
38 | 2 |
39 | Nil |
40 | Nil |
41 | Nil |
42 | Nil |
43 | Nil |
44 | Nil |
45 | Nil |
46 | 1 |
47 | Nil |
48 | Nil |
49 | Nil |
50 | Nil |
51 | Nil |
52 | Nil |
53 | Nil |
54 | Nil |
55 | Nil |
56 | Nil |
57 | Nil |
58 | Nil |
59 | 1 |
60 | Nil |
61 | Nil |
Total | 24 |
Notes:For year ending 31 March 2003.In line with data protection principles, the data have been anonymised.