- Asked by: Nicol Stephen, MSP for Aberdeen South, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 22 March 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 16 April 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it plans to amend the law so that a person need not raise a court action to address any impact that inappropriate detention under the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 may have had on his or her reputation.
Answer
The Scottish Government ran a public consultation, from 7 August 2009 to 6 November 2009, on the Report of the Independent Review of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003.
The consultation also invited comments on the operation of the act which were outwith the remit of the consultation paper but which consultees felt should be drawn to the government''s attention. In addition ministers and officials are happy to take comments on how the act is operating at any time.
Responses to the consultation, including comments on the matter referred to in this question, are currently being considered. Amendments to the act in the light of the consultation will require primary legislation however there will be some changes which can be made through practice guidance or amendments to secondary legislation, in advance of primary legislation.
- Asked by: Nicol Stephen, MSP for Aberdeen South, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 22 March 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 16 April 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it plans to require a court or tribunal to determine whether there is valid and reliable evidence of the existence of a detainable mental disorder before a person is detained and subjected to involuntary treatment under mental health legislation.
Answer
The Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 already provides for a court or tribunal to be satisfied on the evidence as to whether persons are suffering from a mental disorder before detention and compulsory treatment are permitted.
There are limited exceptions to this. Firstly, a certificate by a medical practitioner authorising emergency detention in a hospital for up to 72 hours is permitted, although it should be noted that in this period no compulsory treatment may be given. Secondly, a short term detention certificate for up to 28 days sanctioned by a medical practitioner with specialist experience in the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorder permits treatment. In both of these cases there must be a significant risk to the health and safety of the patient or the safety of others. Thirdly, the Scottish Ministers can, by means of a direction under the act, transfer a prisoner to hospital for treatment on the basis of reports from two medical practitioners who confirm that the prisoner has a mental disorder, and again that there is significant risk to the health, safety or welfare of the prisoner or to the safety of any other person if medical treatment is not provided.
In the cases of short term detention and any transfer to hospital for treatment of a prisoner, both the patient and their named person can apply to the Mental Health Tribunal for revocation of the power to detain and treat.
- Asked by: Nicol Stephen, MSP for Aberdeen South, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 22 March 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 16 April 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive for what reason the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 does not contain a provision for an appeal against a diagnosis of a detainable mental disorder.
Answer
Before an individual is diagnosed as suffering from a mental disorder, there are specific criteria laid down to enable such a diagnosis to be made. There are currently two established international classification systems for mental disorders - ICD.10 and DSM-IV.
Diagnosis is the expression of a clinical judgement and does not in itself have legal consequences in respect of the liberty of the individual. Where the powers of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 are invoked the law does provide for appropriate appeal rights.
Where an individual feels that they may have been misdiagnosed as suffering from a mental disorder of any sort they may ask for a second opinion or they may contact the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland to look into their complaint.
- Asked by: Nicol Stephen, MSP for Aberdeen South, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 22 March 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 16 April 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the provisions in the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 are based on the premise that psychiatrists do not make mistakes when diagnosing someone as having a detainable mental disorder.
Answer
The objective of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 is to make sure people with mental health problems receive effective care and treatment in a way which accords with the Millan principles. Section 328(1) of the act defines mental disorder as mental illness, personality disorder or learning disability, however caused or manifested.
Diagnosis of mental disorder can only be made by an approved medical practitioner (AMP): this is a medical practitioner who has been approved under section 22 of the act by a health Board or by the State Hospitals Board for Scotland as having special experience in the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorder. An approved medical practitioner will often be a consultant psychiatrist. All AMPs must undergo a two day training package in the provisions of the act before being approved to carry out AMP duties under the act.
The act makes provision for the Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland which exercises powers in relation to detention and which ensures that the clinical judgements of AMPs and mental health officers (MHOs) are subject to appropriate scrutiny.
- Asked by: Nicol Stephen, MSP for Aberdeen South, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 29 January 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 8 February 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive how many Scotland-based patients have received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment for the influenza A (H1N1) virus or related illness at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary; when each patient was treated, and in which NHS board area each patient lived.
Answer
Three Scotland-based patients have received Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) treatment for the influenza A (H1N1) virus or related illness at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary. The resident boards of each of these patients and the dates when ECMO treatment commenced are as follows:
Resident NHS Board Area | Date ECMO Treatment Commenced |
Grampian | 17 October 2009 |
Dumfries and Galloway | 4 December 2009 |
Grampian | 23 December 2009 |
- Asked by: Nicol Stephen, MSP for Aberdeen South, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 14 December 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 14 January 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive how many Scotland-based patients have received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment for the influenza A (H1N1) virus or related illness at (a) Glenfield, (b) Papworth and (c) Royal Brompton Hospital.
Answer
Through existing reciprocal arrangements for specialist health services, five Scotland-based patients have received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) treatment for the influenza A (H1N1) virus or related illness at Glenfield Hospital, Leicester; one Scotland-based patient has been treated at the Royal Brompton Hospital in London, and no Scotland-based patients have been treated at Papworth Hospital in Cambridge.
- Asked by: Nicol Stephen, MSP for Aberdeen South, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 24 November 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 7 December 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether capacity to provide adult respiratory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment at the Leicester centre has now been doubled and, if so, when was this achieved.
Answer
Prior to the H1N1 pandemic, Glenfield Hospital had the capacity to provide respiratory ECMO (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) to a maximum of five patients, both adult and paediatric. In line with recommendations made by the UK Critical Care Capacity (UKCCG) sub-group on H1N1 in September 2009, capacity for adult respiratory ECMO at Leicester was increased to eight beds.
This was achieved by re-directing paediatric ECMO patients to centres commissioned to participate in the UK''s paediatric ECMO network; by reducing cardiac elective capacity; by maximising the rotas of existing trained staff and by ensuring all post-ECMO patients were transferred out to referring units as soon as possible. Additional accredited surge capacity has also been commissioned temporarily at the Royal Brompton and Papworth Hospitals. There are now 12 beds in the UK for adult respiratory ECMO, which represents more than a doubling in capacity.
As the UK''s designated centre for adult respiratory ECMO, Leicester is and remains the gateway and first option for access to this treatment. The UK CCG, which reconvened to assess the current provision of ECMO at this stage of the pandemic, recommended on 11 November that Glenfield will maintain its capacity at the current level of eight active ECMO beds in order that this central role can be maintained.
- Asked by: Nicol Stephen, MSP for Aberdeen South, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 24 November 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 4 December 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the adult respiratory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment facilities at the Royal Brompton and Papworth Hospitals are accredited through UK national specialist commissioning arrangements.
Answer
The Royal Brompton and Papworth Hospitals have been assessed and accredited by the UK National Commissioning Group (NCG) as centres providing additional surge capacity for adult respiratory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) treatment in the context of the H1N1 pandemic.
- Asked by: Nicol Stephen, MSP for Aberdeen South, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 24 November 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 4 December 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether a patient in the NHS Grampian area suffering from influenza A (H1N1) and assessed as requiring adult respiratory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment when the Leicester centre was full would be transferred to the Stockholm centre rather than be treated at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S3W-29312 on 4 December 2009. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament''s website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/Apps2/Business/PQA/Default.aspx.
- Asked by: Nicol Stephen, MSP for Aberdeen South, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 24 November 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 4 December 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive, in cases where the adult respiratory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment facilities at the Leicester centre are at capacity, whether patients assessed as requiring such treatment will be transferred to the Royal Brompton or Papworth Hospitals rather than to Aberdeen Royal Infirmary.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S3W-29312 on 4 December 2009. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament''s website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/Apps2/Business/PQA/Default.aspx.