- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 July 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 25 November 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive to specify the local authorities in Scotland which have submitted structure plans for approval since 1 April 1996 and the structure plans that have been approved during the same period.
Answer
Since 1 April 1996 three Structure Plan Authorities have submitted Plans for approval. These are The Moray Council in December 1998, Dumfries and Galloway Council in January 1999 and the Ayrshire Joint Structure Plan Authority in March 1999. The Moray Structure Plan was approved subject to modifications on 12 November and the others are currently under consideration.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 18 November 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Morrison on 25 November 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it is prepared in principle to allow a consortium of private interests to construct the M74 link considered in the recent Strategic Roads Review, and whether it would allow Scottish Enterprise to assist in funding the M74 link from its own annual budgets.
Answer
When Sarah Boyack announced the conclusions of the Strategic Roads Review, she indicated that the M74 Northern Extension would be promoted by the City of Glasgow and South Lanarkshire Councils. It is for these Councils to develop proposals for the procurement and funding of the scheme.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 July 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 25 November 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive to detail for each local authority in Scotland the local plans which (a) are currently being prepared, (b) have been issued for local consultation, (c) have been submitted and are awaiting approval and (d) have been approved since 1 April 1996.
Answer
The information requested is given in the following table
:AUTHORITY | LOCAL PLAN TITLE | IN PREPARATION | AT CONSULTATION | AWAITING ADOPTION | ADOPTED SINCE 1/4/99 |
Fife | Dunfermline and the Coast | | | * | |
| West Villages | | * | | |
| Cupar and Howe of Fife | | * | | |
N. Ayrshire | Irvine/Kilwinning | | * | | |
| Garnock Valley | | * | | |
E. Ayrshire | East Ayrshire | | * | | |
S. Ayrshire. | South Ayrshire | * | | | |
Inverclyde | Inverclyde | | * | | |
N Lanarkshire | Northern Corridor | | * | | |
| Southern Area | | | * | |
S Lanarkshire | Cambuslang/Rutherglen | * | | | |
| Lower Clydesdale | | * | | |
| Hamilton District | | | * | |
E Renfrewshire | East Renfrewshire | * | | | |
Western Isles | Broadbay | | * | | |
| Uist and Benbecula | | * | | |
Highland | South and East Sutherland | | * | | |
| Loch Broom | | | | * |
| Nairnshire | | * | | |
| Inverness Area | * | | | |
Aberdeen City | Aberdeen City | | * | | |
Aberdeenshire | Consolidated Aberdeenshire | | | * | |
Angus | Angus | | | * | |
Scottish Borders | Minerals (Subject Plan) | | * | | |
Stirling | Stirling District | | | * | |
| Loch Lomond | | | * | |
Dumfries & Galloway | Wigtown | * | | | |
| Stewartry | * | | | |
| Nithsdale | * | | | |
| Annandale/Eskdale | * | | | |
AUTHORITY | LOCAL PLAN TITLE | IN PREPARATION | AT CONSULTATION | AWAITING ADOPTION | ADOPTED SINCE 1/4/99 |
Falkirk | Falkirk - 1st Review | | | * | |
| Polmont & District - 2nd Review | | * | | |
City Of Edinburgh | Rural West | | | * | |
East Lothian | East Lothian | | | * | |
Midlothian | Midlothian | | * | | |
Moray | Moray 2000 | | | * | |
Perth & Kinross | Highland | | | * | |
| Perth - Alteration 1 (Housing Land) | | | * | |
| Strathearn | | | * | |
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 17 November 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Morrison on 25 November 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it is prepared in principle to allow a consortium of private interests to construct the M74 link considered in the recent Strategic Roads Review, and whether it would allow Scottish Enterprise to assist in funding the M74 link from its own annual budgets.
Answer
When Sarah Boyack announced the conclusions of the Strategic Roads Review, she indicated that the M74 Northern Extension would be promoted by the City of Glasgow and South Lanarkshire Councils. It is for these Councils to develop proposals for the procurement and funding of the scheme.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 07 September 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Henry McLeish on 10 November 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has commissioned, or intends to commission research into the Fuelmaster device, developed by Andy Guy and John McFarlane, to reduce emissions from petrol-driven vehicles.
Answer
A number of companies market similar devices to the "Fuelmaster". The UK Government's Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU) evaluates these products on an ongoing basis, and the makers of "Fuelmaster" should contact the Unit to have their product evaluated, if they have not already done so. As ETSU provides a UK wide service, there is no need for the Scottish Executive to undertake a separate evaluation.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 October 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 9 November 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-668 on 26 August 1999, whether it will provide updated details on External Finance Limits for Water Authorities in the light of the statement on its expenditure made by the Minister for Finance on 6 October 1999.
Answer
The proposed allocations of external finance for the water industry for 2000-01 and 2001-02 are £216.9m and £218.0m respectively. These allocations, and the External Finance Limits (EFLs) for each Authority, can be confirmed only after the Budget Bill is passed for the financial year in question. Distribution amongst the three authorities is given in the table below: -
Authority | Provisional EFL 2000-01 | Indicative EFL 2001-02 |
North of Scotland Water Authority | £50.0m | £70.0m |
East of Scotland Water Authority | £76.0m | £66.0m |
West of Scotland Water Authority | £90.9m | £82.0m |
Total | £216.9m | £218.0m |
It is planned that part of the external finance for 2001-02 will be covered by unused provision from earlier years, and this is consistent with the expenditure plans set out by the Minister for Finance on 6 October.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 27 August 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Henry McLeish on 4 November 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive what estimates it has made of the potential impact of energy taxes on the costs and competitiveness of high energy using Scottish industries.
Answer
I am aware that concerns have been expressed about the impact of the UK Government's proposals for a climate change levy on particular areas and sectors. I am keeping this matter under close review.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 15 October 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Home Robertson on 29 October 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will make representations to the European Union for an emergency decision on increasing the nephrops quota in 1999 by a further 2000 tonnes in the International Council for Exploration of the Sea (ICES) Division IIa (EC Zone) and North Sea (EC Zone).
Answer
EU Regulations permit Member States to apply for an increase in certain fish quotas if 75% of the EU quota has been utilised before 31 October. In the case of the quota for north sea nephrops, this position has been exceeded in the current year and the Scottish Executive has considered the relevant scientific advice on the sustainability of the stock in the circumstances of this year's fishery. We have concluded that an application for an increase in the quota would be appropriate and an application for an increase was made to the Commission on 5 October.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 22 September 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 29 October 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will (a) identify the costs incurred to date through Blight Notices in respect of each project included in its Strategic Roads Review and (b) estimate the potential total cost of Blight Notices in respect of each project.
Answer
A total of £430,642 has been paid in compensation and related legal and valuation costs in settlement of two Blight Notices which were served on the Department in relation to the A78 Ardrossan, Saltcoats and Stevenson bypass. There are no outstanding Blight Notices on any of the remaining trunk road projects within the scope of the review.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 15 October 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Home Robertson on 29 October 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has powers to give or seek compensation to fishermen for loss of earnings during the period between the ban on nephrops fishing in the International Council for Exploration of the Sea (ICES) Division IIa (EC Zone) and North Sea (EC Zone) and any European Union decision to release additional quota.
Answer
The Scottish Executive has full responsibility for matters relating to fisheries in Scotland. The Executive does not believe that compensation would be appropriate where the exhaustion of quotas make it necessary to close fisheries.