- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 May 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 30 May 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the statement on Caledonian MacBrayne by Sarah Boyack on 27 April 2000 is consistent with table 7.1 of its publication Investing in You which shows a decline in Caledonian MacBrayne's support from #24.4 million in 1999-2000 to #18.5 million in the next two financial years.
Answer
The figure of £18.5 million for 2000-01 and 2001-02 represents the planned provision as agreed in the Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR) in respect of Caledonian MacBrayne's External Finance Limit. The equivalent CSR provision for 1999-2000 was £23.6 million. This was subsequently increased to £24.4 million by supplementary estimates, which took account of a number of adjustments throughout the year.
The CSR provision for 2000-01 and 2001-02 drops due to a fall in planned capital investment. The expenditure implications flowing from my announcement on 27 April in relation to the future of ferry service delivery for the Highlands and Islands will be considered in the light of comments in response to the consultation paper published on that day.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 13 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 23 May 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether any awards of Freight Facilities Grant made before 1 July 1999 remain to be paid and, if so, to specify which payments it will make and which are due to be paid directly from the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
Answer
£2.4 million of Freight Facilities Grant remains to be paid on awards made prior to 1 July 1999. All such payments will be made by the Scottish Executive.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 11 May 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 23 May 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 applies equally in Scotland as in England and Wales and, if not, whether there is any equivalent Scottish Act.
Answer
The Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 applies throughout the UK and is reserved to the UK Government at Westminster.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 May 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Colin Boyd on 22 May 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what guidance is given to Procurators Fiscal about the prosecution of housing benefit fraud and whether it monitors decisions by Procurators Fiscal to prosecute or not in cases of alleged housing benefit fraud.
Answer
Procurators Fiscal are instructed that proceedings in respect of any offence must only be instituted where there is sufficient admissible evidence both that a crime was committed and that the accused committed it. They must also be satisfied that prosecution is in the public interest. Housing benefit fraud may be prosecuted both under statute and at common law. Guidance has been issued in respect of common law fraud and the relevant Social Security offences. Decision-making by Procurators Fiscal is monitored across the whole range of offences and alleged housing benefit fraud is part of that exercise.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 May 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Colin Boyd on 22 May 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it is aware of any variations in practice among Procurators Fiscal in the prosecution of housing benefit fraud and, if so, what action it is taking to address such variations.
Answer
There are no variations in practice among Procurators Fiscal in the prosecution of housing benefit fraud though variations in the content of reports made to Procurators Fiscal undoubtedly lead to variations as to outcome as Procurators Fiscal apply the usual criteria to all cases reported to them. These include whether there is sufficient evidence, including corroboration of the essential facts and whether there is evidence of sufficient quality and reliability to support a prosecution. The Procurator Fiscal will also have to decide whether a prosecution is in the public interest. Application of these criteria to cases involving similar charges can quite properly result in different outcomes.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 03 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 19 May 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether, further to the Minister for Transport and the Environment's statement on the Strategic Roads Review, it will identify those multi-modal corridor studies which have already been (a) completed or (b) commissioned.
Answer
We have advertised for consultants to begin the M80 and M8 corridor studies announced in the Roads Review.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 February 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 17 May 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-870 by Donald Dewar on 24 August 1999, what monitoring each department carries out to ensure compliance with the target timescale for responding to letters from MSPs; what overall monitoring takes place, and what procedures exist for MSPs, where targets are not met, to secure a quick reply.
Answer
All Departments of the Scottish Executive have systems in place to monitor performance against targets for all letters due for a ministerial reply. This includes letters from MSPs. Departments also report performance formally through a parliamentary answer.To help improve response times, the Executive is improving and standardising the recording, monitoring and workflow systems used to handle ministerial correspondence. The introduction of a new corporate system will enable central scanning, logging and allocation of all ministerial correspondence and will produce management information not readily available at present. This will include information on cases in progress and those overdue. Reports on the handling of MSPs' correspondence will be available. The introduction of the new system is due to be completed by the end of June 2000.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 13 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 17 May 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the statement by the Minister for Transport and the Environment to the Transport and the Environment Committee on 19 January 2000, whether it has the power to issue instructions to the Strategic Rail Authority in respect of what is currently the ScotRail franchise and, if so, whether it will instruct the Strategic Rail Authority to bring forward the renewal of this franchise in order to accelerate investment in Scotland's railway network and services.
Answer
Under the provisions made in the UK Transport Bill, introduced on 1 December 1999, the Scottish Ministers will be able to issue directions and guidance to the Shadow Strategic Rail Authority for passenger rail services that begin and end in Scotland. Since the Bill has not completed its passage through Parliament at Westminister, the Scottish Ministers are not yet able to exercise these powers.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 25 April 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 9 May 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive when it anticipates responding to parliamentary questions S1W-2735, lodged on 23 November 1999; S1W-2963, lodged on 3 December 1999; S1W-3454, lodged on 20 December 1999; S1W-3946, lodged on 25 January 2000, and S1W-3953, lodged on 25 January 2000.
Answer
PQ's S1W-2963 and S1W-3946 were answered on 25 January and 2 May respectively. The delay in responding to the others is being investigated and answers will be issued as soon as possible.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 30 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 5 May 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive why, given the requirement in the Scottish Ministerial Code that Ministers should refuse to provide information only when disclosure would not be in the public interest, it did not consider it to be in the public interest, in accordance with the relevant statute and the Government's Code of Practice on Information, to provide the information requested in its answers to questions S1W-4642 and S1W-4662 by Sarah Boyack on 21 March 2000.
Answer
Disclosure of information which would harm the frankness and candour of internal discussion is exempted from the commitment to provide information under the Code of Practice on Access to Scottish Executive information.