- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 30 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what powers it has to revoke decisions to call in planning applications and notices of intention to develop and whether it will detail each such decision revoked since 1 May 1997.
Answer
There is no specific provision in planning legislation which provides the Scottish Ministers with the power to revoke a direction to call-in a planning application or notice of intention to develop. Accordingly, no such directions have been revoked during the period since May 1997.However, in the light of a recently issued court judgement relating to an English planning application (Trustees of the Friends of the Lake District v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions: 26 March 2001 Ref: CO/4008/2000) it is now recognised that, in certain circumstances, it may be possible to revoke such directions, provided there are compelling and justifiable reasons for doing so.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 22 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what arrangements it has made following the award of the trunk road maintenance contracts regarding the funding of ongoing revenue costs, including future maintenance and replacement costs, in relation to street lights on trunk roads where these are on circuits together with local authority lighting.
Answer
The Scottish Executive retains responsibility for maintenance and replacement costs for all street lighting on trunk roads. Negotiations will commence very soon with the local authorities on the nature and scope of the work required, including the appropriate sharing of costs, where trunk road lighting shares electrical circuits or supplies with local road lighting and where such circuits require maintenance or replacement. The Scottish Executive will continue to pay the cost of the electricity supply directly based on an inventory of trunk road lighting.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 22 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-14599 by Sarah Boyack on 23 April 2001, why no resources have been committed to funding the preparatory work for the development of the proposed Aberdeen western peripheral route.
Answer
My answer to question S1W-14599 set out the Executive's planned expenditure on the motorway and trunk road network 2001-02 to 2005-06. The proposed Aberdeen western peripheral is not a trunk road. On 14 March I announced a £1.25 million package of support to help the North East Scotland Economic Development Partnership to advance their proposed Modern Transport System, which includes the western peripheral.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 22 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what directions have been issued regarding the detection and prompt removal of irradiated particles on the beach at Dounreay; whether any such directions have now been fully implemented; whether the beach is now clear of such particles, and, if not, when it is anticipated that all such particles will have been detected and removed.
Answer
The Scottish Executive has issued no directions regarding irradiated particles.The Secretary of State for Scotland wrote to the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) in 1998 asking it to ensure that there was sufficient monitoring at Sandside Beach, near Dounreay, such that any particles on the beach were promptly detected and removed. SEPA has required the operators of Dounreay, the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA), to carry out monthly monitoring of the whole beach and to notify SEPA of any particles found. The monitoring programme continues.The possible mechanisms by which the particles arrive at the beach are being investigated by UKAEA. This investigation is subject to scrutiny by the independent Dounreay Particles Advisory Group (DPAG) which was set up to provide independent scientific advice to SEPA and UKAEA on the particles of irradiated nuclear fuel found in the marine environment around Dounreay. The interim DPAG report is available on the SEPA website at the following address:(http://www.sepa.org.uk/regs_licence/radioactivity/dpag/dpaghome.htm).
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 22 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what arrangements it has made following the award of the trunk road maintenance contracts regarding the sharing of ongoing revenue costs, including future maintenance and replacement costs, in relation to traffic lights at intersections of trunk roads and local authority roads.
Answer
The Scottish Executive retains responsibility for all maintenance and repair costs for traffic signal installations at intersections of trunk roads and local authority roads. Where such signal installations are linked to local authority control rooms as part of a wider system of traffic control within urban areas, agreement has been reached with the local authorities to pay a proportionate cost for the operation of the system.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 23 January 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 17 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive how it reviews the planning implications in Scotland of UK-wide infrastructure initiatives and policy changes in airport, dock, rail and road services, power generation and transmission and oil and gas exploration and licensing and how it ensures local community participation and parliamentary accountability in re-formulating policy in these areas.
Answer
The Memorandum of Understanding between the UK Government and the devolved administrations, together with the supporting Concordats between the Scottish Executive and Whitehall Departments, provide for communication and consultation between the Executive and the UK Government on all issues where actions taken by one administration may have a bearing on the responsibilities of the other. This would enable the Executive to consider the planning implications for Scotland of any proposals for UK-wide infrastructure initiatives and policy changes. The implications can be brought to the attention of the Scottish Parliament as necessary and its views can be taken into account before the Executive makes its input to policy formulation. Public consultation may be conducted on a UK basis or separately in Scotland by the Executive as appropriate.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 16 January 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 17 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-8375 by Sarah Boyack on 13 July 2000, whether the investigation into the cost and practical implications of ending the date-stamping on books of discount tickets for the Skye Bridge has been concluded and, if so, whether it will announce its decision on the ending of date-stamping.
Answer
In response to representations from MSPs, Highland Council and others last year, I asked officials to explore the possibility of ending date stamping of books of discount vouchers for Skye Bridge. Following discussions, the Concessionaire, Skye Bridge Limited, have made it clear that they are not willing to change the present arrangements. The discount vouchers already offer generous benefits to frequent users of the bridge, most of whom are local people, but I will discuss this matter further with the company later this year.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 25 April 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus MacKay on 9 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what its accommodation costs were in 1999-2000 and 2000-01; what its projected accommodation costs are in each year from 2001-02 to 2003-04, expressed in the prices used for the Scottish Budget 2001 in each case and detailing any non-recurring maintenance expenditure in each of these years, and whether it will detail any major accommodation maintenance requirements being considered for the post-2004 period.
Answer
Accommodation costs for the period requested are set out in table 1 (actual costs for 1999-2000 and 2000-01 and projected costs for the subsequent years).Table 1: Accommodation Costs (£ million)
| 1999-2000 | 2000-01 | 2001-02 | 2002-03 | 2003-04 |
Costs: Cash Basis | 34.484 | 32.938 | 33.939 | 27.858 | 27.858 |
Costs: Real Terms 1999-2000 prices | 34.484 | 32.371 | 32.542 | 26.060 | 25.424 |
Accommodation costs include capital expenditure, rent, rates and other charges relating to property, the cost of accommodation-related staff and services such as maintenance (reactive and planned preventative), security, cleaning and fuel and utility costs.Non-recurring maintenance expenditure is set out in table 2. This includes planned decorative work, planned replacements and upgrading of equipment such as fire alarms and heating controls. The figures do not include reactive maintenance. The cost of non-recurring maintenance is incorporated within the figures in table 1.Table 2: Non Recurring Maintenance Expenditure (£ million)
| 1999-2000 | 2000-01 | 2001-02 | 2002-03 | 2003-04 |
Costs: Cash Basis | 0.408 | 0.630 | 0.888 | 0.997 | 0.608 |
Costs: Real Terms 1999-2000 prices | 0.408 | 0.619 | 0.851 | 0.933 | 0.555 |
Plans for non-recurring maintenance are adjusted each year as condition surveys are received from consultants. There are no current plans for a major maintenance project post 2004.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 25 April 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 9 May 2001
To ask the Presiding Officer what the accommodation costs were in 1999-2000 and 2000-01 for the accommodation currently occupied by the Parliament; what the projected accommodation costs in respect of the current accommodation are in each year from 2001-02 to 2003-04 and what the annual projected accommodation costs are thereafter for the new Parliament building at Holyrood, all expressed in the prices used for the Scottish Budget 2001.
Answer
The Parliament's accommodation costs (i.e. rent, rates, utilities and building maintenance) for 1999-2000 and 2000-01, and the equivalent budgeted figure for 2001-02, are shown below expressed in cash terms. The projected costs for subsequent years are still under discussion. Those for 2002-03 will be included in the level 2 figures due to be submitted to the Finance Committee in September.
1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02£2,118,000 £2,768,000 £3,060,000
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 16 January 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 25 April 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-6054 by Sarah Boyack on 20 April 2000, whether it is now able to provide details of how the Public/Private Partnership (PPP) proposed for the A77/M77 upgrade (Malletsheugh-Fenwick) will differ from that used for the Paddy's Rickle Bridge-Cleuchbrae phase of the M74 and whether the A77/M77 PPP is intended to include operation and maintenance of any section of the A77/M77 corridor other than that to be constructed.
Answer
The nature and extent of the proposed Public/Private Partnership and the extent of the contract have not been finalised, but will take into account matters raised by the Audit Committee in relation to the M74 contract.It is intended that the M77 Fenwick to Malletsheugh trunk road scheme and the local authority Glasgow Southern Orbital proposal would be procured as a single Public/Private Partnership depending on the outcome of the recent Public Local Inquiry into the Southern Orbital.