- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 August 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 6 September 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, with reference to the speech by Malcolm Chisholm MSP to the Chartered Institute of Housing Conference on 7 March 2006, which local authorities it considers have shown an insufficient commitment to the identification of a genuine long-term effective land supply that will provide an opportunity for the development of the range of housing types in suitable locations as well as greater certainty for both developers and local communities; what guidance it proposes to issue to improve the regular auditing of effective land supply, and what steps it proposes to ensure that local authorities respond appropriately to the minister’s injunctions to create “a step change in the whole approach to the supply of land for housing”.
Answer
My remarks to the conferenceon 7 March 2006 were intended to urge local authorities collectivelyto show much greater commitment through their development plans to the identificationof a genuine long-term effective land supply. I expect this to be achieved by acombination of local authorities making more effective use of existing planningprocesses (the type of issue that is being explored by the Affordable Housing WorkingGroup) and by the Executive progressing measures to support the supply of affordablehousing and land for housing more generally.
The provisions in the currentPlanning Bill are designed to speed up the preparation of development plans, whichin turn will be a mechanism to increase the amount of land available for housingdevelopment. We have commissioned research to consider the effectiveness of measuresto allocate land for affordable housing, and in particular the potential role ofa separate use class for affordable housing. We are also working hard to improveaccess by affordable housing providers to surplus public sector land.
Housing land audits are usedto quantify current housing land supply, and to assess which sites are “effective”.SPP 3 emphasises that audits should normally be updated on a yearly basis and PAN38 provides further advice. However, I understand that across Scotland theremay be variations in approach to the audit process. We are considering commissioninga short research project to identify good practice to help establish more consistency.
Taken together, these measuresshould help to deliver the “step change” in our approach to land supply about whichI spoke on 7 March 2006.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 29 June 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Peter Peacock on 6 September 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive how many newly-qualified teachers have been given a probationary teaching post under its teacher induction scheme in each year since the scheme was introduced; how many of these teachers have completed their probationary years successfully in each year; how many have gone on to find permanent jobs with (a) the same education authorities with which they were initially placed or (b) with other authorities; how many have found permanent employment in teaching after a period of unemployment, supply teaching or other employment, and how many have failed to find permanent teaching posts.
Answer
The following table providesnumbers of probationers participating in each year of the induction scheme sinceit started in August 2002. Most of those who fail to complete do so either due tohealth related absence or competence related issues or a combination of these factors.
On the issue of employment I refer the member to the answer to question S2W-18887on 28 September 2005. All answers to written parliamentary questions are availableon the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search. Year | Total no. of Probationers as at August | Successfully Completed Probationary Year |
2002-03 | 2,078 | 2,021 |
2003-04 | 1,845 | 1,770 |
2004-05 | 2,093 | 1,991 |
2005-06 | 2,737 | figures not yet available |
2006-07 | 3,668* | |
Total | 12,421 | |
Note: *As at June.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 August 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 4 September 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, with reference to the speech by Malcolm Chisholm MSP to Homes for Scotland on 19 May 2006, what steps it is taking to ensure that local authorities’ development plans contain adequate allocations of land for house building, reasonable estimates of the potential contribution of windfall sites and a more flexible approach to development planning, so that each local authority area has an adequate effective land supply.
Answer
An adequate supply of landdepends upon up to date and relevant development plans. One of the foundationsof our current proposals to modernise the planning system is that developmentplans must be reviewed every five years. In doing so, planning authoritiesshould find it easier to meet the requirements currently set out in SPP 3, suchas ensuring an effective supply of land is maintained at all times to meethousing requirements for at least the forthcoming five years.
I recognise that thesesignificant changes will take time to have their full impact, which is why weare also exploring how to make progress without recourse to legislation. TheAffordable Housing Working Group that I am chairing is looking precisely atthese issues.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 August 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 4 September 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, with reference to the speech by Malcolm Chisholm MSP to Homes for Scotland on 19 May 2006, what mechanisms it is putting in place to monitor the full impact of PAN 74 and assess whether it is delivering an adequate land supply for affordable housing development.
Answer
We are expanding the rangeof statistics that are collected by the Scottish Executive DevelopmentDepartment to monitor the impact of PAN 74. In particular, we have begun workto introduce a new data collection from 2007-08 to gauge the contribution ofplanning agreements to the supply of affordable housing. In the shorter term,the current research into allocation of land for affordable housing through theplanning system will provide some information on the early impact of the PAN. TheAffordable Housing Working Group which I am chairing is also assessing theeffectiveness of the current framework of national policy and advice onaffordable housing.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 August 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 4 September 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, with reference to the speech by Malcolm Chisholm MSP to the Chartered Institute of Housing Conference on 7 March 2006, when it will publish research into potential planning mechanisms such as a use class for affordable housing to secure an adequate supply in the long term of affordable housing and when it expects to be able to report real progress in making better use of surplus land within the public sector estate for affordable housing.
Answer
The research into allocationof land for affordable housing through the planning system, which is to includeconsideration of the potential introduction of a use class for affordablehousing, is expected to conclude in September and will inform the progress of the Planning Bill. As with all research commissioned by the Scottish Executive,subject to the report being of an appropriate standard, we would intend to publishin due course after the report has been finalised.
Real progress has alreadybeen made on making better use of surplus public sector land for affordablehousing. Our agreement with Forestry Commission Scotland is already assistingthe provision of affordable housing in rural areas, with five sites sold inInchree, Fort Augustus, Glenmore, Ratagan and Bunessan. A further fivesales are currently progressing at Salen, Succoth, Dalavich, Strontian andKilmun. Furthermore, the Executive has made a commitment that surplus sites onthe Scottish Ministers’ crofting estate will be made available for affordablehousing wherever possible. The response to question S2W-23170 in March 2006 setout the full range of on-going action which the Executive is taking to identifyfurther surplus public sector land for affordable housing.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 August 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 29 August 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will invite the City of Edinburgh Council to consider re-running the community ownership ballot in Edinburgh and, if so, whether it will extend the eligible electorate to include prospective tenants, in addition to current tenants, given the interest which the former have in the outcome of the ballot.
Answer
The Community Ownership Programmeis open to any local authority in Scotland, and each application is considered on its own merit.
The City of Edinburgh Council is reviewing the options for the future of its housing and any decisionto re-apply to the community ownership programme lies with the council.
Tenant participation is at theheart of community ownership and section 76 and Schedule 9 of the Housing (Scotland)Act 2001 clearly sets out the requirements for statutory consultation with tenantswhose homes are included in a transfer proposal. There are no proposals to changethis guidance to include prospective tenants.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 August 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 29 August 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive what the membership and remit will be of its Affordable Housing Working Group and whether it will identify all research sponsored by or for the working group and the anticipated timescales for reporting.
Answer
The remit of the Affordable HousingWorking Group is “To establish means of securing the more effective supply of affordablehousing in areas of greatest need”. The group has met on one occasion and was attendedby representatives from four local authorities, Homes for Scotland, the ScottishFederation of Housing Associations, COSLA and Scottish Water. There will be a furthermeeting of the group in October at which the work programme will be discussed, althoughat this stage it is not envisaged that the group will prepare or present a formalreport. The work of the group will be informed by research already commissionedby the Executive on the allocation of land for affordable housing through the planningsystem. The completed research is expected to be available prior to the Octobermeeting of the working group.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 17 August 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 29 August 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will issue instructions or advice to local authorities in relation to delayed starts to local plan inquiries, in light of criticisms made by the Chief Inquiry Reporter in the foreword to Inquiry Reporters Unit: Review of the Year 2005 - 2006.
Answer
The Scottish Executive InquiryReporters Unit (SEIRU) has already issued advice to local authorities on this matter.In March of this year the Chief Inquiry Reporter wrote to all Heads of Planningin local authorities explaining how improvements in current practice at local planinquiries were being implemented. The first paragraph of that advice suggested thatthe planning authority should establish a timetable for the lead-in to the publicinquiry from the end of the deposit period, allowing sufficient time for its ownconsideration of the merits of the objections lodged to the local plan and for thepreparation of all documentation. Additionally, the SEIRU have adopted a more systematicapproach to assessing authorities’ state of preparation. In addition to a quarterlyprogress report from all authorities, the Unit explores the realism of the programmefor each local plan through preparatory meetings involving the SEIRU and local authorityofficials before committing to the provision of a reporter.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 03 August 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 29 August 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive when it expects to issue revised guidance to local authorities on local housing strategies and whether the revised guidance will ensure that housing needs assessments are conducted sufficiently rigorously to meet the requirements of local development planning and to form the basis of housing resource allocation by ministers.
Answer
I have asked Angiolina Foster,Chief Executive of Communities Scotland, to reply. Her response is as follows:
A number of changes will affecthow local authorities prepare their Local Housing Strategies. These include legislativechanges arising from the Housing (Scotland) Act 2006, proposals to create a nationalStrategic Housing Investment Framework, and on-going work to ensure that assessmentsof future housing need are more consistent and more strongly linked to assessmentsof overall housing supply requirements for development planning purposes.
These changes will necessitaterevisions to the current guidance on the preparation of Local Housing Strategies.Local authorities are expected to update their current Local Housing Strategiesby early 2009. We propose therefore to issue a series of revisions to the guidanceto reflect these changes in sufficient time for local authorities to prepare bothfor the implementation of the Strategic Housing Investment Framework and for theirLocal Housing Strategies to be completed by the deadline.
Local housing needs assessmentsare complex exercises that must be prepared using robust methodology that takesaccount of both local and national requirements. We will shortly be piloting anexercise which aims to gather needs assessment information in a standard way. Whenthe exercise is rolled out across Scotland at the end of the year, it will help us to gain a betterunderstanding of the relationship between local and nationally undertaken needsassessments. More consistent and reliable local needs assessments will enhance theirvalue as a contributory element of soundly based development plans and in informingresource allocations.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 29 June 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tavish Scott on 26 July 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive what estimate it has made of the volume of minerals which will be required for the construction of the M74 Northern Extension; what its policies are for sourcing the necessary minerals locally; what work it has carried out to satisfy itself that sufficient local mineral sources exist, to avoid large volumes of material being transported over long distances into Glasgow, and whether the statutory consents are in place to allow all minerals to be obtained, through extraction or recycling, from within acceptable transport distances.
Answer
An analysis of the quantityof materials required and the proposed mitigation is described in some detailin the Environmental Statement prepared for the scheme a copy of which can be obtained from the Scottish Parliament’s Reference Centre (Bib. number 40051).
The sourcing of materials andany necessary statutory consents will be a commercial matter for the contractorfor the works. During the development of the scheme, preliminary investigationswere undertaken into potential sources of infill within Central Scotland. A number of these sources offer the potential for rail haulage to thesite.
Transport Scotland hasthe operational responsibility for this area, and can be contacted for moreinformation if required.