- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 December 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 17 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it, or any of its agencies, publishes statistics on babies born in transit to maternity hospitals and, if not, whether it will consider publishing such statistics in future in relation to the impact of greater centralisation of service delivery arising from rationalisation of consultant-led maternity services.
Answer
The Information and Statistics Division (ISD) of the Common Services Agency is the main agency that publishes information on births and maternities. ISD has no plans at present to publish these statistics. However, if a clear intent was identified the figures on babies born before arrival at hospital could be incorporated in the Women and Children’s Health pages on the ISD website. It should be noted that these data include all babies born before arrival in hospital i.e. those born at home or elsewhere as well as those born in transit.
The following table shows the number of babies born before arrival to Scottish hospitals (not specifically in transit) for 1998-02.
Year | Amount |
1998 | 231 |
1999 | 247 |
2000 | 240 |
2001 | 211 |
2002p | 253 |
Source SMR02, ISD Scotland.
Note: pprovisional.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 28 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mary Mulligan on 10 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether, with regard to the extension of planning controls to marine fish farming, operators of existing fish farming businesses will be eligible to apply for, and obtain, certificates of lawful use in relation to uses that they can demonstrate have been in existence for 10 years.
Answer
Transitional arrangementsfor existing marine fish farms will be addressed in our forthcomingconsultation paper on extension of planning controls. There are a number ofcomplex issues to be dealt with before we can introduce the necessary changesto the planning system. My officials have had very constructive discussions inthis regard with key stakeholders, including industry representatives.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 December 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 20 January 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it intends to issue any guidance to Scottish Water in respect of reducing or eliminating the allowable cost figure that Scottish Water applies in respect of new water and sewerage connections.
Answer
Part 2 of the WaterEnvironment and Water Services (Scotland) Act 2003 provides for ministers tomake regulations determining what is a reasonable cost, for the purposes of section1 of the Sewerage (Scotland) Act 1968 and section 6 of the Water (Scotland) Act1980, which deal respectively with new water and new sewerage connections tothe public water and sewerage networks.
Ministers made clear duringthe passage of the 2003 act that regulations determining reasonable cost were likelyto mean that developers would no longer receive an automatic subsidy fromScottish Water on more or less every house that they build. Instead they wouldnormally be expected to provide the infrastructure as part of the development.
Regulations under Part 2 of the act will be the subject of public consultation before they are brought intoforce.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 December 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 13 January 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the introduction, enactment and commencement of the Water Industry (Scotland) Act 2002 (Directions in the Interests of National Security) Order 2002 was subject to any protocol agreed between it and Her Majesty's Government; whether it was informed or consulted on the content of the order, and how the Scottish Parliament will be notified of the exercise of powers delegated to UK Ministers which impact on devolved areas of policy.
Answer
The general principlesgoverning relations between the UK Government and the Executive on matters ofmutual interest, including legislation, are set out in the published
Memorandumof Understanding.
In respect of the Water Industry (Scotland) Act 2002 (Directions in the Interests of National Security) Order 2002, the Scottish Executive invited the UK Government to make provision for the central purpose of reinstating powers in respect of Scottish Water that had existed in respect of its predecessor authorities under the Local Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. In general the functions of these organisations had transferred to Scottish Water under the WaterIndustry (Scotland) Act 2002. However, as the reinstatement was beyond the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament and could not be achieved under the act, it was made by the order under powers conferred for such purposes on UK ministers by the Scotland Act 1998.
As a general rule, the intention would be to notify the Scottish Parliament ofsuch orders as and when a significant impact on devolved areas of policy isexpected. In this case, information about the laying and commencement of the orderwas provided to the Scottish Parliament in answer to question S1W-26219 andcopies of the draft Order (SI 1264 (S4)) were lodged in the Scottish Parliament'sReference Centre (Bib. number 21338). Additionally, directions made by Scottishministers under that order were notified to the Scottish Parliament in December2002 and January 2003.
All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 December 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 8 January 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has any plans to require Scottish Water to review its practice of issuing annual fixed charges to non-domestic consumers for water and waste water services.
Answer
No.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 October 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Margaret Curran on 9 December 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-20674 by Iain Gray on 19 December 2001, what the out-turn in actual cash expenditure was in each of the last two years; what the (a) estimated actual cash expenditure and (b) allocation for expenditure under community ownership (wider regeneration) will be for each year to 2005-06, and how much of the Scottish Homes and Communities Scotland approved development programme funding was made available to housing associations and other registered social landlords in each year since 1992-93.
Answer
The information requested,where available, is included in the following tables.
Year | Scottish Homes/Communities Scotland Approved Development Programme |
| Expenditure (£ million) |
2001-02 | 225.481 |
2002-03 | 219.606 |
Year | Scottish Homes Own Stock Capital Investment |
| Expenditure (£ million) |
2001-02 | 6.773 |
2002-03 | 5.333 |
Year | HRA capital Allocations |
| Expenditure (£ million) |
2001-02 | 181.400 |
2002-03 | 162.578 |
Year | HRA Usable Receipts |
| Expenditure (£ million) |
2001-02 | 74.283 |
2002-03 | 114.294 |
Year | Non-HRA Spending |
| Expenditure (£ million) |
2001-02 | 41.578 |
2002-03 | Incomplete Information |
Year | Rough Sleepers Initiative |
| Expenditure (£ million) |
2001-02* | 20.336 |
2002-03** | 19.256 |
*Includes £2.590 million homelessnessfund and £3.280 million Glasgow Hostels Fund.
**Includes £14.432 million homelessnessfund & £1.988 Glasgow Hostels Fund.
Year | Empty Homes Initiative |
| Expenditure (£ million) |
2001-02 | 6.352 |
2002-03 | 0.369 |
Year | New Housing Partnerships/Community Ownership |
| Expenditure (£ million) |
2001-02 | 66.062 |
2002-03 | 90.493 |
Year | Housing Support Grant |
| Expenditure (£ million) |
2001-02 | 9.029 |
2002-03 | 9.221 |
Year | Warm Deal/Central Heating Installation Programme Fuel Poverty |
| Expenditure (£ million) |
2001-02 | 30.705 |
2002-03 | 37.823 |
Year | Capital Financed from Revenue |
| Expenditure (£ million) |
2001-02 | 80.326 |
2002-03 | 131.273 |
Year | Housing Association Funding HA Rent & LCHO |
| Expenditure (£ million) |
1992-93 | 253.758 |
1993-94 | 260.927 |
1994-95 | 264.878 |
1995-96 | 272.980 |
1996-97 | 250.532 |
1997-98 | 171.509 |
1998-99 | 163.991 |
1999-2000 | 171.702 |
2000-01 | 181.070 |
2001-02 | 193.428 |
2002-03 | 191.240 |
Outturns for 2002-03 areestimated figures.
Spending plans for communityownership (wider regeneration) in the period up to 2005-06 are contained in thecommunities chapter of the draft budget 2004-05. Allocations to councils andestimated expenditure will depend on councils’ proposals in developing housingstock transfers.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 13 October 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 14 November 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive, in light of the commitment made by the Minister for Transport to the Local Government and Transport Committee on 7 October 2003 in regard to providing the committee with updated and detailed information about the progress and implementation of its strategic transport infrastructure projects (Official Report c 118), whether all MSPs will also be kept so informed, and, if so, how that information will be provided.
Answer
I have placed in the Parliament’s Reference Centre, a copy of the information about the majortransport infrastructure projects that I provided to the Local Government andTransport Committee for its consideration of the Draft Budget for 2003-04 (Bibnumber 29380).
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 October 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Margaret Curran on 14 November 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what research it has commissioned into the impact of the Homelessness etc. (Scotland) Act 2003 on the (a) need for affordable housing in Scotland as a whole and (b) requirement for new housing in each local authority area and what plans it has to increase the supply of new affordable housing beyond its previous target of 18,000 new houses over three years.
Answer
Each local authorityrequires to assess housing needs across all tenures within its area in terms ofits local housing strategy, which should complement the local authority'shomelessness strategy and other strategic plans. In making this assessment itwill need to take into account its duties under the 2003 act and any effect itconsiders those duties will have on the level of need for affordable housing inits area.
The 2003 act sets theframework for the expansion, and ultimate abolition, of the “priority need”definition within homelessness legislation, with the end target that all “unintentionallyhomeless” households will be entitled to permanent accommodation by 2012. Researchis being commissioned which will identify a methodology for assessing thecapacity of local authorities to respond to this change. The 2003 act requires ministersto publish, by 31 December 2005, a statement on the abolition of the priorityneed test. This ministerial statement will be informed by the outcomes of theresearch.
The partnership agreementincludes a commitment to the provision of an additional 18,000 new and improvedhomes for social rent and low-cost home ownership by 2006. We will in duecourse consider plans for subsequent years in the context of the spendingreview and in the light of all relevant evidence including that relating to anyeffect on housing need arising from the 2003 act.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 October 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 14 November 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive how much accumulated revenue over-expenditure has been incurred by NHS Boards since 1999; on what terms it has written off any such amounts incurred by boards, in particular NHS Tayside, and whether it has any plans to offer a similar write-off to NHS Argyll and Clyde once that authority has demonstrated its ability to bring its revenue expenditure within its allocation.
Answer
In 2001-02 the Scottish Executive allocated an additional £90 million to NHS boards to accelerate theimplementation of
Our National Plan: A Plan for Action, A Plan for Change.The £90 million formed part of the Finance Minister’s end year flexibility settlementand was distributed across all NHS boards. First call on this funding was, as apriority, the clearing of all cumulative deficits which had arisen since April2001. Hence using these resources, seven NHS trusts had their cumulativefinancial deficits of £41 million written off as shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Cumulative FinancialDeficits Written Off During 2001-02
NHS Trust | £000 |
Argyll and Clyde Acute Hospitals NHS Trust | 3,305 |
Renfrewshire and Inverclyde Primary Care Trust | 1,077 |
Grampian University Hospitals NHS Trust | 4,914 |
North Glasgow University Hospitals NHS Trust | 9,491 |
South Glasgow University Hospitals NHS Trust | 4,092 |
Highland Acute Hospitals NHS Trust | 2,744 |
Tayside University Hospitals NHS Trust | 15,852 |
Total | 41,205 |
When the funds weredistributed, Susan Deacon stressed that this was a one off exercise which wouldnot be repeated. The funds were provided to give a clean slate to the new unifiedNHS boards and to provide a real opportunity to develop initiatives flowingfrom Our National Plan. It was stressed that NHS systems and in particularaccountable officers must ensure that future deficits were not accumulated.
Since 2001-02, 3 NHS boardareas have incurred revenue deficits at trust level; Argyll and Clyde,Grampian and Lanarkshire. As at 31 March 2003, the accumulated financialdeficits are as outlined in Table 2.
Table 2: Accumulated FinancialDeficits as at 31 March 2003
NHS Board Area | £000 |
Argyll and Clyde | 9,635 |
Grampian | 4,829 |
Lanarkshire | 10,169 |
Total | 24,633 |
The Scottish Executive does not have any plans to write off the above balances. The HealthDepartment is working closely with boards in the development of their financialrecovery plans, which demonstrate how the board areas will return to recurringfinancial balance and repay any accumulated financial deficits.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for West of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 13 October 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mary Mulligan on 10 November 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive whether land and buildings belonging to Scottish Water are Crown property and therefore exempt from planning and building regulations and what directions have been given to, or protocols agreed with, Scottish Water to ensure that works carried out by, or for, it comply with planning and building requirements.
Answer
Land owned by Scottish Water is not Crown property and does not therefore benefit from Crown immunity from planning and building regulations. Scottish Water has therefore not been given any directions by, nor have they agreed any protocols with, the Scottish Executive to comply with planning and building requirements.