- Asked by: Mike Rumbles, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 23 April 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Clare Haughey on 2 May 2019
To ask the Scottish Government how much funding it provides for mental health support services that are designed specifically for ex-service personnel and their families, and what proportion of this is spent in the NHS Grampian area.
Answer
Through commissioning arrangements with NHS Ayrshire and Arran, the Scottish Government provides Combat Stress with £1.4 million per annum to deliver specialist mental health treatment for Veterans in Scotland.
In 2019-20, NHS Grampian will receive the highest uplift of any Board for the second year running with £28.1 million increased investment and a share of £392 million to go towards improving patient outcomes. This takes the Board’s overall funding to £957.9 million in 2019-20. Within its overall uplift of 3.1%, NHS Grampian will receive a £4.2 million share of additional parity funding, which ensures it is no further than 0.8% from target share of funding.
With this record funding available to NHS Grampian, we expect them to make future funding decisions that reflects the needs of their own local population and that of veterans.
- Asked by: Mike Rumbles, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 23 April 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 1 May 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the Parliament agreeing motion S5M-8497, as amended, on 31 October 2017, what progress is being made in allowing every school child in the country access to cycle proficiency training.
Answer
Transport Scotland funds Cycling Scotland to deliver Bikeability training, which is available to all schools in Scotland. 42% of schools participated in 2018-19 reaching over 36,000 pupils, an increase from 37% in 2015-16.
To compliment Bikeability training, in 2018-19 we provided £2.35 million in grant funding to Sustrans to run its Safer Routes To Schools programme which supports the building of safer infrastructure to and around schools to enable more walking and cycling to schools by both teachers and pupils.
- Asked by: Mike Rumbles, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 23 April 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 1 May 2019
To ask the Scottish Government how much it has cost in staff overtime to deliver the Basic Payments Scheme in each year since 2015-16.
Answer
Year | Amount |
2015-16 | £531k |
2016-17 | £430k |
2017-18 | £471k |
2018-19 | £404k |
The 2018-19 could be amended as the final accounts for this year are not yet finalised.
Please note that the figures in each case are totals, across the Rural Payments and inspections Division (RPID) and the Information Systems Division (ISD). Staff in these divisions work on a range of activities, which are more or less related to the task of making payments (application processing, validation, inspections, field mapping, monitoring, administering, supporting the IT, etc). A precise breakdown by activity is not available.
- Asked by: Mike Rumbles, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 27 March 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Joe FitzPatrick on 23 April 2019
To ask the Scottish Government how many times the NHS has been subject to litigation in each year since 1999 because of alleged damage caused by vaccines, also broken down by NHS board; whether it will list the cases where the claim was upheld, and what information it has for the period from 1978 to 1998.
Answer
The information sought is not held by the Scottish Government.
- Asked by: Mike Rumbles, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 01 April 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 18 April 2019
To ask the Scottish Government how it tracks its policy announcements and associated deadlines; what management system it has for this, and whether it will make this information public in a transparent and accessible format.
Answer
The annual Programme for Government lays out the Government’s policy and legislative agenda, the aim of which is to work towards achieving the Outcomes in the National Performance Framework (NPF).
Other policy announcements are made in Parliament and/or through the Scottish Government website to ensure accessibility and transparency. Delivery is monitored through embedded business management and monitoring processes.
The Government reports annually on spending, and a range of information including policy specific plans and progress reports is published at www.gov.scot .
Information on Scotland’s progress on the NPF can be accessed at www.nationalperformance.gov.scot.
- Asked by: Mike Rumbles, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 27 March 2019
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 4 April 2019
To ask the Scottish Government when the transport secretary last met representatives of the Rail Freight Group.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 4 April 2019
- Asked by: Mike Rumbles, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 15 March 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kevin Stewart on 26 March 2019
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has considered introducing legislation similar to the private members' bill recently considered in the House of Commons on a minimum height for letterboxes; what regulations on letterbox height apply in Scotland, and how these can be amended.
Answer
The Scottish Government has not considered introducing legislation on the minimum height for letterboxes. There are no regulations for the provision or location of letterboxes within the Scottish building regulations. Changes to these regulations and supporting guidance is normally led by an evidence based approach.
- Asked by: Mike Rumbles, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 25 March 2019
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 26 March 2019
To ask the Scottish Government when passengers will see improvements as a result of ScotRail’s recent remedial plan.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 26 March 2019
- Asked by: Mike Rumbles, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 March 2019
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 28 March 2019
To ask the Scottish Government how it ensures that its management of the public finances takes account of the needs of the people of the North East Scotland region.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 28 March 2019
- Asked by: Mike Rumbles, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 March 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 19 March 2019
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has discussed with the UK Government the impact of imported hormone treated beef entering Scottish markets if external trade deals are agreed with nations that allow the practice following Brexit, and what the outcome was.
Answer
Through our membership of the EU, farming and food production in Scotland is undertaken under some of the highest animal health and welfare standards for livestock in the world. Our products, including Scotch Beef, Scotch Lamb and Specially Selected Pork are world renowned for their quality and provenance. The Scottish Government is clear that we will continue to adhere to current and future EU standards and regulations.
We have been absolutely clear that we would not tolerate any trade deal which would allow imports that would compromise these health and safety standards of our meat, and this includes the introduction from any country of hormone treated beef.
The UK Government has indicated that UK (and hence Scottish) producers will not face unfair competition from imports produced under lower standards, however, it has refused to accept an amendment into its agriculture bill which would provide in law that imported food should meet the same standards as food produced in Scotland and the UK.
As you may be aware, in October of last year the European Council authorised the European Commission to open negotiations on an agreement with the United States on imports of high quality beef from animals not treated with certain growth promoting hormones. We would expect the UK Government to take the same approach and stance in any trade negotiations in the future with the USA to not allow any imports of hormone treated beef.