- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 January 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Elaine Murray on 24 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what discussion it has had with sportscotland regarding the recent departure of three senior members of staff.
Answer
The cessation of these three posts formed part of the proposed new management structure of sportscotland as recommended in last year's Organisational Review of sportscotland. This was approved by the Scottish Executive.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 January 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 24 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether ministers were first alerted before 23 February 2001 to any report from the Institute of Animal Health or from any other body that indicated a threat from the PanAsia Type O strain of foot-and-mouth disease.
Answer
Ministers were alerted to the current outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease on Wednesday 21 February 2001. Prior to that they were not aware of any report of any threat from the PanAsia Type O strain of the virus.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 January 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 24 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has made any assessment of the accuracy of information regarding the location, si'e, nature and current operational status of farms available to the state veterinary service, to the police or to other services during the outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in 2001.
Answer
SEERAD made two key sources of information available to those involved in tackling the outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in 2001.The first source was basic information held in the EU Agricultural subsidies database, the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) which provided details of all IACS and agri-environment claimants. This covers most agricultural holdings, the exception being pig and poultry farms and non-claimants. The IACS Field Register was used to provide geographic information on the boundaries of fields and farms. The grid reference of each holding found to be infected was used to identify details of fields and farms located within the 3km exclusion zone of that holding. A set procedure was established to ensure that checks were undertaken within SEERAD to verify the grid reference prior to use, to ensure its accuracy. Under the IACS regulations, claimants are subject to a regime of administrative checks and on-the-spot inspections to validate claims, with a percentage of farms inspected each year. The inspection process includes checks on the physical field boundaries. These existing check processes ensured that the data were fit for use in fighting foot-and-mouth disease.The second source was the Agricultural Census, which provided a register of all agricultural holdings. Farmers are required to register their agricultural holdings with the census branch under sections 78 and 79 of the Agriculture Act 1947, and thus the details held should be complete and current. However, in reality, it is acknowledged that a small number of farmers refuse to complete census forms or confirm land movements, and thus completeness and accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The census registration includes pig and poultry farms and non (or part-non) claimants, and so could be used to complement the IACS information.In addition to this, local knowledge of SEERAD agricultural staff from the local area office was used to supplement the centrally-held information. There were no significant accuracy issues identified with either data source, although there were a few instances where people owned livestock as pets and so their address was not classified as agricultural premises and not identified by the data sources.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 January 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 24 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what steps it is taking to make available a complete, accurate and regularly updated database of farms giving precise details of their locations, si'e, nature and current operational status.
Answer
Farmers are required to register their holdings under the Agriculture Act 1974 with the Agricultural Census branch, and thus a complete database of farms already exists. However, in reality, it is acknowledged that a small number of farmers refuse to complete census forms or confirm land movements, and thus completeness and accuracy cannot be guaranteed.In addition, the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) holds details of all claimants for EU agricultural subsidies. Both systems are subject to restrictions on the uses to which these data may be put, due to confidentiality constraints. Discussions are on-going to ensure that coverage of both systems is as complete and consistent as possible.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 January 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 24 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it received any complaints or comments from the state veterinary service, the police or other services, including local authorities, during or after the outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in 2001 regarding the accuracy of information on the location, si'e, nature and current operational status of farms and what the nature of such complaints and comments was.
Answer
The Scottish Executive have not received any complaints or comments from the police, State Veterinary Service or any other organisation concerning the accuracy of the information on the location, size, nature, and current operational status of farms.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 January 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 24 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive when it first became aware of the existence of the PanAsia Type O strain of foot-and-mouth disease.
Answer
The pandemic strain of foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype O, which has been named PanAsia, was first identified in northern India in 1990. It spread westwards into Saudi Arabia in 1994 and then throughout the Near East and into Europe (Turkish Thrace, Bulgaria and Greece) in 1996. This information would have been passed to all member states of the European Union by the OIE.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 January 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 24 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether proposed alterations to a draft school inspection report suggested by a local education authority that are detrimental to the school are investigated by Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Education before being accepted.
Answer
I refer the member to the answers given to questions S1W-21706 and S1W-21708. Any amendments to reports are only made as result of careful consideration of all relevant evidence.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 January 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 24 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what procedures are followed when Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Education is considering whether to alter a draft inspection report following comments made by a local authority.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-21706. During inspections, Her Majesty's Inspectors (HMI) take account of evidence drawn from a number of sources, including comments by the education authority, headteacher and school board chair, data from a representative sample of parents, and first-hand experience of the learning and teaching in the school. These procedures are outlined in inspection guidance, which is publicly available. Based on all the evidence gathered in the course of the inspection, the published report records HMI's professional evaluation of the standard of the school.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 January 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 24 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive at what international conferences on agriculture or animal health and disease it was represented by its officials in each of the last two years and whether foot-and-mouth disease was discussed at any such conferences.
Answer
In the past two years the Scottish Executive has been represented at the following international conferences:Conference of Directors of EU Paying Agencies, Portugal - May 2000;The World Potato Conference, Amsterdam - September 2000;The Annual General Meeting of the OIE, Paris - May 2000;FMD Conference on Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Brussels - December 2001;FMD was discussed at the OIE and Foot-and-Mouth Disease Conferences.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 January 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 24 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what proportion of draft school inspection reports were altered in each of the last five years in order to render them more critical of a school following comments made by the responsible education authority.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-21706. Any amendments to reports are only made as result of careful consideration of all relevant evidence and not solely on comments from any source, including an education authority. Final responsibility for changes - as with every aspect of the published inspection report - clearly lies with HMIE.