- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for Argyll and Bute, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 10 November 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen McLeod on 24 November 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what arrangements it has put in place to ensure that action is being taken to eradicate Japanese knotweed on publicly-owned land.
Answer
It is not our policy to eradicate Japanese knotweed in Scotland or to eradicate it from all publicly-owned land. That effort would be prohibitively expensive and is unlikely to be successful.
Where Japanese knotweed has been reported as causing a problem on land owned by Scottish ministers we will consider options for treatment or eradication. Where it is reported on local authority land, the local authority is responsible for assessing what should be done.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for Argyll and Bute, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 11 November 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen McLeod on 24 November 2015
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will designate the Seil/Shuna/Melfort loch system as a single sea loch for the purpose of better regulating fish farming in the area.
Answer
The Scottish Government has designated Disease Management Areas based on separation distances, tidal excursions and other epidemiological disease risk factors. Disease management area 16d includes the Seil/Shuna/Melfort loch system as well as the Loch Craignish system. This is considered as one single area for the purposes of disease management.
The Seil/Shuna/Melfort loch system forms part of a Farm Management Area, area M40 as designated in the Scottish Salmon Producers Organisation’s Code of Good Practice. The Aquaculture and Fisheries Act 2013 requires fish farmers to be party to a farm management agreement or to maintain a farm management statement which must contain provisions about the following matters – fish health management, management of parasites, live fish movements, harvesting and fallowing.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for Argyll and Bute, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 10 November 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maureen Watt on 23 November 2015
To ask the Scottish Government whether it is aware of the findings of research undertaken on vibroacoustic disease for the RMT union suggesting that (a) it affects around 70% of men exposed to loud low frequency noise, (b) susceptibility may be worse with low body mass index, and women may, therefore, be particularly prone to the condition, (c) the effects are accelerated in unborn children and (d) under the current legislation there is no requirement to protect staff working in transport and, if so, what action it is taking to protect workers from the condition.
Answer
We are aware that some researchers have suggested that there may be harmful health impacts arising from exposure to low frequency noise.
The Scottish Government receives expert evidence-based advice on environmental public health issues from Health Protection Scotland, our national health protection experts, and also from Public Health England. Both organisations also draw on the advice of expert subject-specific committees.
In 2010 the independent Advisory Group on Non-Ionising Radiation considered the issue of health effects of exposure to ultrasound and infrasound. The group found that there was no evidence that infrasound levels normally encountered in the environment would lead to vibroacoustic disease, and also found that the suggested disease itself had not gained clinical recognition.
Peer-reviewed evidence published since the group's report does not alter that report’s conclusions. Individuals who are concerned about their symptoms should consult their GP.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for Argyll and Bute, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 10 November 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maureen Watt on 18 November 2015
To ask the Scottish Government how many people in Scotland have vibroacoustic disease, broken down by (a) local authority area, (b) age and (c) sex.
Answer
Information on how many people in Scotland have vibroacoustic disease is not collected centrally.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for Argyll and Bute, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 10 November 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maureen Watt on 18 November 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to ensure that (a) the NHS is fully aware of and (b) suitable treatment is provided to people diagnosed with vibroacoustic disease.
Answer
In 2010 the independent Advisory Group on Non-Ionising Radiation considered the issue of health effects of exposure to ultrasound and infrasound. The group found that there was no evidence that infrasound levels normally encountered in the environment would lead to vibroacoustic disease, and also found that the suggested disease itself had not gained clinical recognition.
Peer-reviewed evidence published since the group's report does not alter that report’s conclusions. Individuals who are concerned about their symptoms should consult their GP.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for Argyll and Bute, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 30 October 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Paul Wheelhouse on 12 November 2015
To ask the Scottish Government whether it plans to review the adults with incapacity legislation and, if so, what the timescale is and what consultation arrangements it is planning.
Answer
We have committed to consulting on the Scottish Law Commission’s Report on Adults with Incapacity. The report covers compliance of the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 with Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights, specifically in relation to deprivation of liberty issues. It is anticipated that a consultation paper will issue around the end of 2015, and it will be open to anyone with an interest to respond. Thereafter, a scoping exercise will follow in relation to a wider review of the adults with incapacity legislation.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for Argyll and Bute, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 October 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Marco Biagi on 12 November 2015
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will ensure that no proposal made by the Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland regarding changes to the electoral wards in Argyll and Bute is accepted without taking (a) full account of local views and (b) the opportunity for local hearings to be held.
Answer
Section 18(2) of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 as amended requires the Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland to carry out local consultations, and to take any representations made to it into consideration, in conducting any reviews of local government electoral arrangements. Such consultations will be conducted before the commission submits any proposals for change arising from such reviews to ministers.
Section 19 of the 1973 Act provides that the commission may cause a local inquiry to be held in respect to any review carried out by it. Decisions on whether to hold any such inquiries are a matter for the commission. In addition, under section 210 of the 1973 Act as amended ministers may cause a local inquiry to be held before making any order arising from proposals submitted to them by the commission. A decision as to whether to hold such an inquiry in relation to proposals for Argyll and Bute or for any other area would only be taken by ministers after they had received any proposals for that area from the commission.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for Argyll and Bute, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 October 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Marco Biagi on 12 November 2015
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will ensure that the Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland provides reasons for what are considered radical changes, such as those proposed for Argyll and Bute in its Fifth Review, other than parity between numbers of voters in wards and roughly equal ratios of councillors to voters.
Answer
The Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland is independent of the Scottish Government. The commission has carried out a series of consultations on its proposals for changes to local government electoral arrangements in the 32 Scottish council areas, including Argyll and Bute. The last of those consultations, a public consultation on proposals for ward boundaries, closed on 22 October 2015. The commission will now consider the responses to those consultations and submit its proposals to ministers.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for Argyll and Bute, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 October 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Marco Biagi on 12 November 2015
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will inform the Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland of the concerns in Argyll and Bute at the proposed loss of the name, Cowal, as an electoral area.
Answer
The Scottish Government has passed to the Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland all concerns it has received about the commission's proposals for Argyll and Bute, including about the proposed loss of the name of Cowal for an electoral area.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for Argyll and Bute, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 October 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Marco Biagi on 12 November 2015
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will ensure that the modern boundaries of a national park are not used by the Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland to decide on ward boundaries rather than other links such as social cohesion, communications and historical connection.
Answer
The Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 as amended sets out how the Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland is to conduct reviews of local government arrangements, including specifying matters to which the commission is required to have regard in conducting such reviews. Within that framework it is for the commission to decide how it will conduct reviews, including what matters they will take into account in producing any proposals arising from such reviews. Decisions on whether to implement proposals produced by the commission, including any proposed changes to ward boundaries, will be taken by the Scottish Ministers.