- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 20 September 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 28 September 2016
To ask the Scottish Government how greenhouse gas savings from the restoration of degraded peat compare with potential savings from tree planting.
Answer
Both tree planting and peatland restoration can provide greenhouse gas savings. However it is not possible to provide a strict comparison as to the relative scale of greenhouse gas benefits as this will depend on a wide variety of factors such as soil type and condition and type of tree being planted. The level of greenhouse gas sequestration for both will build up over time.
Greenhouse gas estimates for peatland restoration are currently in the process of being finalised but the estimates provided by ClimateXChange for the second Report on Policies and proposals suggested peatland would deliver net emission reductions of 1.5 tCO2e/ha (cumulative) over five years; 12 tCO2e/ha over 15 years, 21 tco2e/ha over 20 years and 32.5 tCO2e over 25 years. We expect to see updated estimates later this year.
On average the Greenhouse gas savings from tree planting would be 4.25 tco2e/ha (cumulative) over five years; 55.5 tco2e/ha over 15 years; 161.5 tco2e/ha over 20 years and 283 tco2e/ha over 25 years.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 31 August 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Humza Yousaf on 27 September 2016
To ask the Scottish Government what financial support it has provided to (a) third sector organisations and (b) local authorities to conduct research to support the development of potential projects through the Scottish Transport Appraisal Guidance process.
Answer
In the last eight years, the Scottish Government has provided in the region of £211,000 to a variety of organisations including Nestrans, Highland/North Ayrshire/Perth and Kinross Council and Glasgow Airport. The Scottish Government has also committed to contribute to funding through the Longannet Task Force and the Aberdeen City Region Deal.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 September 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kevin Stewart on 23 September 2016
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the motion passed at the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) World Conservation Congress in September 2016, which called for a moratorium on peat exploitation, whether it will reconsider its proposals to extract peat from a site at Auchencorth Moss in Midlothian, and what the reasons are for its position on this matter.
Answer
The Scottish Government is not the promoter of peat extraction at Auchencorth Moss and does not have any proposals to extract peat from the site.
In terms of proposal to extract peat within Scotland can I refer the member to the answer to questions S5W-01192 and S5W-01197 on 20 July 2016, planning applications are determined in accordance with the relevant development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. Scottish Planning Policy (2014) paragraph 248 is clear that the review of mineral permissions every 15 years should be used to apply up-to-date operating and environmental standards. As a statement of Ministers’ priorities the content of Scottish Planning Policy is a material consideration that carries significant weight.
All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at: http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 September 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kevin Stewart on 23 September 2016
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-01192 by Kevin Stewart on 20 July 2016, what percentage of consents have complied with the requirement for a 15-year review and what action it takes if a council fails to meet this.
Answer
The reviewing of old mineral permissions is a matter for individual Planning Authorities to address. The information requested is therefore not held centrally.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 September 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 20 September 2016
To ask the Scottish Government how it is working with the UK Government in response to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) UK Peatland Programme’s recent call for the UK to restore one million hectares of peatlands by 2020.
Answer
The Scottish Government liaises with all UK administrations on matters of common interest such as sharing knowledge and best practice around peatland protection and restoration. Through the National Peatland Plan Scotland has established a programme of action to protect, manage and restore our peatlands and through the Scottish Natural Heritage led Peatland Action the Scottish Government has been able to support of peatland restoration projects delivering around 10,000 hectares since 2012-13 as well as support to projects that enhance our capacity to undertake restoration, such as training and best practice guidance.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 September 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 20 September 2016
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the recent call by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) for global action to be taken to halt the loss of and restore damaged peatlands, what action it is taking to ensure that Scotland’s peatlands are (a) protected and (b) restored.
Answer
The Scottish Government, along with Scottish Natural Heritage, published Scotland's National Peatland Plan in August 2015. The Peatland Plan establishes a framework in which the Scottish Government, along with SNH, are leading the way forward in the management, protection, and restoration of Scotland’s peatlands, and as a consequence, protects its biodiversity and ecosystems. The Peatland Plan established a National Peatland Group which involves partners such as the IUCN Peatland Inquiry to support its delivery and along with a Monitoring and Research Group ensuring an evidence base and helping future actions.
In addition to the protection afforded by the suite of Natural sites and SSSIs, specific actions in the Plan include Scottish Planning policy which provides protection for peatlands as well as the work funded by the Scottish Government, through its Strategic Research Programme and Centres of Expertise, to deliver multi-disciplinary research to improve our knowledge of peatlands. This knowledge is then used to develop new tools and approaches to support sustainable management and help achieve restoration targets. Funding to support peatland restoration and management is available through the Scottish Rural Development programme and SNH has supported more than 100 projects through its Peatland Action initiative.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 September 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 20 September 2016
To ask the Scottish Government how it is working with the UK Government to meet the UK target to phase out the use of peat in the horticultural sector by 2030, and what steps it is taking to address any historic consents regarding permission to extract peat beyond that year.
Answer
Scottish Government officials contributed to the work that led to the Sustainable Growing Media Task Force's 2012 report, ‘Towards Sustainable Growing Media’. In 2014 the level of peat sold for horticultural use was 24% lower than the 2011 baseline. At its August meeting Scotland’s National Peatland Group discussed the scope for further work to support phasing out the use of peat in horticulture and the group is considering what further actions it could support to address a global issue. Scottish planning policy confirms that planning authorities should use their development plans to protect areas of peatland and only allow commercial extraction in very limited circumstances; consents from historic consents are a matter for individual planning authorities.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 September 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 15 September 2016
To ask the Scottish Government whether it considers that the Scottish salmon farming industry is compliant with new regulations adopted by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration prohibiting imports from fisheries where marine animals are intentionally harmed.
Answer
Compliance with import regulations in another country is a matter for companies exporting to that market. The seal licensing system in Scotland enables fish farms to control seal predation as a means of last resort. Having a licence is not mandatory, and some fish farms choose to use only non-lethal deterrents instead.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 05 September 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 15 September 2016
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-00029 by Roseanna Cunningham on 24 May 2016, when it will make a decision on the status of the European beaver.
Answer
A decision on the status of the European beaver in Scotland will be announced before the end of 2016.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 05 September 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 15 September 2016
To ask the Scottish Government what work is being undertaken to devise a framework to support the management of European beavers in Scotland.
Answer
No decision has yet been made on the future of beavers in Scotland. Any framework that may be required to support the future management of beavers in Scotland will be discussed with relevant stakeholders in due course.