- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 12 December 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Henry McLeish on 3 January 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what the European and external affairs responsibilities are of the Minister for Education, Europe and External Affairs; whether there is any concordat or agreement regarding the Minister's interaction with Her Majesty's Government in relation to those responsibilities, and in what areas the Minister has devolved and executively devolved responsibilities or acts jointly with the (a) Department of Trade and Industry and (b) Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
Answer
Many of the devolved
matters for which
Scottish Ministers are responsible have a European Union (EU) or international dimension. The concordats on EU and international issues provide that Scottish Ministers pursue these interests within the framework of policy on EU and international matters for which the UK Government has overall responsibility.
The Minister for Education, Europe and External Affairs and his Deputy support me and the Deputy First Minister in co-ordinating the Executive's interest in issues relating to these EU and international aspects of devolved business. In doing so the Ministers work closely with various Departments of the UK Government.
- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 12 December 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Wendy Alexander on 3 January 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive how much money was paid by the Scottish Higher Education Funding Council to the Joint Information Systems Committee in each year since 1997; how these figures were calculated by the council and by each university; whether any representations were made regarding the amounts paid, and how much was used directly for research in each year.
Answer
This is a matter for the Scottish Higher Education Funding Council. The information requested is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 12 December 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Wendy Alexander on 3 January 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the budget for higher education proposed in the Comprehensive Spending Review will be increased should Bell College and/or the University of the Highlands and Islands become the responsibility of the Scottish Higher Education Funding Council for future funding; if so, what the level of any increase would be and, if the funding is not to be increased, what reduction there would be in funding per institution.
Answer
The funding proposals for the Scottish Higher Education Funding Council previously announced take into account the possibility of these designations. In addition, there will be a further increase in the funding proposed for the SHEFC when Bell College and the UHI are designated as higher education institutions as a result of a transfer of funds from the Scottish Further Education Funding Council. The level of that increase will be dependent on a number of factors including the timing of that happening and the agreed numbers of funded places.
- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 14 December 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 3 January 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive, in relation to article 1.1(b) of the tri-partite agreement between Lombard Corporate Finance Ltd, Northlink Orkney and Shetland Ferries Ltd and the Scottish Ministers as set out in schedule 2 of the draft undertaking by the Scottish Ministers under section 2(1) of the Highlands and Islands Shipping Services Act 1960, what criteria will be used to decide who is "financially robust" and which incoming operators it considers at present meet those criteria.
Answer
The Executive wishes to ensure that any incoming operator in future is financially robust (or guaranteed by another entity to be financially robust) to perform the approved services. The criteria to determine whether an incoming operator is financially robust will be made clear as part of the next tendering exercise. It is not possible at this stage to specify in advance which incoming operators would meet any criteria set.
- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 14 December 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Wendy Alexander on 3 January 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what funding guidance it has given or plans to give the Scottish Higher Education Funding Council regarding the current pay dispute with university staff over lecturers' pay; whether any such guidance will be the same as that issued by the Secretary of State for Education and Employment, and what discussions it has had with the Secretary of State on this guidance and on the settlement of the dispute.
Answer
Pay negotiations are a matter for employers and the representatives of employees in the higher education sector. The Scottish Higher Education Funding Council is not an employer body nor does it take part in pay negotiations for the sector. I have had no discussions with the Secretary of State for Education and Employment on this matter nor has guidance on the handling of the current pay dispute been issued by the Secretary of State or the Executive.
In my guidance letter of 23 November to SHEFC, I emphasised the need for the sector to improve human resource policies and management recognising that staff are our key resource. I believe the funding proposals for SHEFC provide sufficient headroom to increase the unit of funding to institutions to help them address modernisation issues such as management and leadership, progressive human resource policies and maintain the quality of teaching and learning.
- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 December 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Wendy Alexander on 21 December 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what the total cost was of the Independent Committee of Inquiry into Student Finance.
Answer
There have been no further costs associated with the Independent Committee of Inquiry into Student Finance since Henry McLeish's response of 22 March 2000 to question S1W-5137. The figure of £472,111.73 represents the final costs for that inquiry.
- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 December 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Colin Boyd on 21 December 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to questions S1W-4517 and S1W-4518 by Colin Boyd QC on 20 March 2000, whether it has considered the recent findings of the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee in relation to the crash of the Chinook ZD576 on the Mull of Kintyre in June 1994 and, if so, what action it intends to take.
Answer
The Public Accounts Committee Report Ministry of Defence: Acceptance of the Chinook Mk 2 Helicopter has been considered. The committee was critical of the acceptance procedure and critical of the RAF Board of Inquiry. It considered that it was "very difficult to rule out categorically a technical fault as at least a contributory cause" of the crash but the committee did not identify any factor which might make it possible to go higher than that so as to be likely to cause the Sheriff to reconsider his conclusion that he was unable to determine the cause of the accident and that he should not speculate. Indeed the committee stated its belief that the Ministry of Defence should be guided by the conclusion of the Sheriff. This being so, it appears to me that the position remains as stated in my letter of 19 May to Mr MacAskill: it is highly unlikely that anything that has come to light since the Fatal Accident Inquiry would alter the Sheriff's determination. Accordingly, I do not propose to take any further action on this matter.
- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 December 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Morrison on 21 December 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-11315 by Mr Alasdair Morrison on 30 November 2000, what (a) actions have been taken and (b) financial contributions have been made by (i) the Scottish Executive, (ii) Scottish Enterprise and (iii) the Scottish Tourist Board over the last three years in order to support and influence the promotion of new and improved transatlantic air links.
Answer
The Scottish Executive has no role in the promotion of new air services. As indicated in the answer to S1W-11315, the development of additional routes and services is a matter for the commercial judgement of the airlines themselves.
Scottish Enterprise and the Scottish Tourist Board work closely with Scottish Airports to support and influence all carriers flying direct into Scotland. Scottish Airports provide a package of direct support which covers both inbound and outbound promotion.
The Scottish Tourist Board does not give direct financial contributions to the airlines. Their contribution to the promotion of air links comes indirectly through the £700,000 annually spent on marketing in the USA, both direct to the consumer and to the trade. All promotions signpost details on how to get to Scotland. Direct flights are highlighted and several tactical promotions are undertaken specifically with the airline for, for example, city breaks in the autumn.
Following the withdrawal in 1998 of British Airways transatlantic service to New York, Scottish Enterprise supported the development and marketing of a new direct service to Newark, ensuring Scotland maintained an "all year round" service to North America.
- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 22 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 20 December 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether there have been any increased costs to Scottish ports or harbour boards caused by light dues levied on visiting cruise liners and ships using cargo freight who call at Scottish ports and harbours and whether it will detail any representations made regarding this.
Answer
The Scottish Executive has no responsibilities in relation to light dues. This is a reserved matter and the responsibility of the Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions. The Executive has received no representations on this issue.
- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 15 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Morrison on 20 December 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive how many staff are involved in the marketing of Scotland in trade and tourism, broken down by grade and remit.
Answer
Scottish Trade International promotes trade and exports from Scotland through development assistance to companies at an individual level. It does not undertake the generic marketing of Scotland in terms of trade.
The Scottish Tourist Board has 50 staff, from Director level to clerical support, directly involved in marketing Scotland as a tourist destination to the UK and internationally. They are supported by the remaining 160 staff who are indirectly involved in marketing-related activities.All of the British Tourist Authority's 506 staff are directly or indirectly involved with the promotion of Scotland as part of the "United Kingdom" as a tourist destination.