To ask the Scottish Executive what the implications are for subsidies, ferry operators and the communities that depend on lifeline ferry services of the statement in the Caledonian MacBrayne 2005-2006 Annual Report and Consolidated Financial Statements that “…the European Directive on maritime cabotage,…provides that State Aid may be paid only to fulfil a Public Service Obligation…”, in light of the Executive’s position that Public Service Obligations are not required on subsidised Caledonian MacBrayne routes.
There has been a degree of confusionon this issue in recent media coverage and it may be helpful if I set out a fullexplanation. Article 4.1 of the Maritime Cabotage Regulation says:
“A Member State may concludepublic service contracts with or impose public service obligations as a conditionfor the provision of cabotage services, on shipping companies participating in regularservices to, from and between islands.”
This very clearly states thatpublic service obligations and public service contracts are alternatives. Article4.2 of the Regulation says:
“In imposing public service obligations,Member States shall be limited to requirements concerning ports to be served, regularity,continuity, frequency, capacity to provide the service, rates to be charged andmanning of the vessel”
Article 2.3 of the Regulationrecords that:
“A public service contract maycover notably:
- transport services satisfyingfixed standards of continuity, regularity, capacity and quality,
- additional transport services,
- transport services at specifiedrates and subject to specified conditions, in particular for certain categoriesof passengers or on certain routes’
- adjustments of services toactual requirements.”
From this, It is evident thata public service contract allows a wider range of factors to be specified, includingthe critical factor of quality, than a public service obligation. This is made veryclear in the Communication on the interpretation of the Maritime Cabotage Regulationpublished by the European Commission in December 2003. Section 5.3.1 of this documentsays:
“Article 4.2 of the Regulationsets out an exhaustive list of requirements that may be introduced when “publicservice obligations” are imposed. Article 2.3 of the Regulation provides only anindication of the scope of public service contracts; Member States may go further.In practice, quality requirements are often part of ‘public service contracts’,but cannot be introduced as part of ‘public service obligations’.”
The Executive wishes to ensurea high quality service, including the binding of operators to the vessels that havebeen purpose-built for the Clyde and Hebrides services, and this is only possible through a publicservice contract.
There is scope for confusion,given the different senses in which the word “obligation” can be used. The wordcan refer to the instrument or regulation used to impose the limited range of requirementspermissible under a “public service obligation”. However, it can also refer to thepublic service duties and responsibilities that are imposed on a contractor by meansof a “public service contract”. Any contract imposes obligations on the contractorand in the case of a “public service contract” these are public service obligations.This point is illustrated well in a recent Answer given by the European TransportCommissioner in response to a Written Question (P-3802/06) on the subject. The answerreads:
“Council Regulation (EEC) No3577/92 of 7 December 1992 applying the principle of freedom to provide servicesto maritime transport within Member States (maritime cabotage) allows Member Statesto impose public service obligations on all operators on a given route to ensuresufficient service on that route where it appears that, if they considered theirown commercial interest, operators would not propose an adequate level of services.These obligations may be imposed by regulation or, if this does not suffice to meetessential transport needs in an adequate manner, laid down by way of public servicecontracts. If necessary, financial compensation may be granted to operators to coverthe costs involved in meeting public service obligations.
The imposition of public serviceobligations is therefore a precondition for any compensation being given.
Such compensation does not constituteState aid if complies with the criteria laid down by the Court of Justice in itsjudgment in Altmark.”
The key sentence is “These obligationsmay be imposed by regulation or, if this does not suffice to meet essential transportneeds in an adequate manner, laid down by way of public service contracts.” Thisclearly maintains the principle that imposing obligations by way of regulation (ieproceeding via a Public Service Obligation) and laying the obligations down by wayof public service contracts are alternative, not complementary, routes. In the caseof the Clyde and Hebrides ferry services, the obligations that the contractor willbe expected to accept will be set out in the service specification for the tenderand will be embodied in the contract that is ultimately signed with the selectedoperator.
There is, therefore no questionof two documents or instruments - a Public Service Obligation, imposed by regulation,and a Public Service Contract - being required before subsidy can be offered. Aswith any contract, the obligations can be set out in the contract itself.