- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 August 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 31 August 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to increase economic development and employment in the Dunoon and Cowal areas.
Answer
The Scottish Government is committed to increasing sustainable economic activity and employment across all regions of Scotland, including in Dunoon and the Cowal area. Tackling economic challenges in Argyll and Bute is a key priority for the Scottish Government’s economic development agency in the area, Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE), which does so by offering a wide range of support mechanisms to businesses and communities. In fact I visited Hunter’s Quay ferry terminal, Hunter’s Quay holiday village in Dunoon and Drimsynie Estate holiday village in Lochgoilhead on 8 June. As an example of this support, over the past three years HIE has invested around £4 million into the area, generating additional investment of approx. £15 million. This significant level of support includes £1.9 million into developing offices at the Sandbank Business Park, £0.9 million in the Portavadie Marina which leveraged a further £8 million investment into the area, a £300,000 contribution towards the £1.7 million redevelopment of the Dunoon Burgh Hall, and £250,000 investment into the Firstport Social Challenge Programme to enable social enterprise start-ups. These investments and improvements to business conditions have contributed to the unemployment rate in the Dunoon and Bute travel to work area falling from 3.3% in June 2014 to 2.3% in 2015. The Scottish Government also works close with local partners to further support local economic growth. Following a meeting with the Deputy First Minister on 29 October 2014, Argyll and Bute Council established an economic forum to consider specific local opportunities and challenges. Scottish Enterprise, HIE, and senior officials represent the Scottish Government on the forum. We will continue to engage with local stakeholders in driving forward initiatives aimed at increasing sustainable economic growth and tackling unemployment.
- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 August 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 25 August 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to increase the number of retailer businesses in the centre of Dunoon and decrease the number of empty shops.
Answer
Scotland’s Town Centre First Principle agreed with COSLA, together with the range of measures set out in the Town Centre Action Plan, set the conditions and underpin activity designed to tackle key issues such as empty shops, diversify town centre offer and thereby attract a range of businesses and services to locate there. We also deliver the most competitive business tax environment in the UK, with two in five properties in Scotland paying zero or reduced rates under the Scottish Government’s Small Business Bonus Scheme and relief also available under Fresh Start. Local authorities remain responsible for local economic development. They are best placed to respond to local circumstances, working with their communities to develop the right vision for their town centres, in partnership with the wider public, private and community sectors.
- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 July 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 20 August 2015
To ask the Scottish Government how many scallop fishermen who dredge over hard gravel or rock and do not pull up mass marine vegetation might be affected by the proposed marine protected areas that were announced on 11 June 2015; what support it can provide, and what discussions it has had with their representatives.
Answer
All scallop dredge operations have a negative impact on the seabed to some extent. The estimated total impact on the annual revenue of the 103 boats potentially affected by the measures is approximately £300,000. This equates to 1.6% of the estimated annual gross revenue of around £18.6 million. However some boats may be disproportionally affected. Where this is the case support is available for vessel diversification through the European maritime and fisheries fund. Marine Scotland will provide advice on this as requested. Since 11 June 2015 there have been two meetings with the Scottish fishermen’s federation to discuss the proposals on 17 June and 6 July.
- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 July 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 20 August 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the reported concerns that its predicted economic impact assessments of the proposed marine protected areas that were announced on 11 June 2015 do not factor in the impact on processing and other associated economic activity and employment.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S4W-26571 on 20 August 2015. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx
- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 07 July 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 20 August 2015
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason a zoning approach for prawn fishing vessels was not adopted as a proposal for the Mingulay Reefs area.
Answer
East Mingulay SAC was designated as a special area of conservation (SAC) in 2011 to protect both stony and biogenic reef habitats. This includes 100% of the only known lophelia pertusa reefs in UK inshore waters.
The avoidance of physical disturbance and abrasion by fishing gear of the reef habitats and associated species is the primary consideration. Biogenic reefs are very fragile and even accidental impact can lead to irreversible degradation. A further consideration has been the potential risk that the reef habitats are subject to smothering by sediments stirred up by adjacent trawling activity. The proposed measures are considered to be the best approach to minimise the risk of direct or indirect impacts from trawling on any of the reef habitats, and to minimise risks posed to the biogenic habitats by static gear.
- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 July 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 20 August 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the reported concerns that the proposed marine protected areas that were announced on 11 June 2015 will be used as a means to regulate fishing rather than a protection of limited marine features.
Answer
The proposed measures will regulate fishing activities to protect the marine environment. They will ensure that the conservation objectives of each marine protected area are furthered.
- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 July 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 20 August 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the reported concerns that the proposed marine protected areas that were announced on 11 June 2015 go beyond Scottish Natural Heritage recommendations and protected features.
Answer
The advice from Scottish natural heritage (SNH) with regards to the protected features at each site was either to remove, avoid or reduce limit pressure from various fishing activities. SNH did not specify how the advice should be met. The measures proposed are designed to further the conservation objectives by minimising risk to the most sensitive habitats and species, and reducing risk to others. Where there are features with a recover conservation objective or they are the only example in the MPA network a more precautionary approach has been adopted.
- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 July 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 20 August 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to reported concerns that fish processors were not adequately consulted before the proposed marine protected areas were published on 11 June 2015.
Answer
Since April 2013 Marine Scotland has offered a range of opportunities for engagement at events to fishermen, Industry representatives, and any other stakeholders at locations throughout Scotland. This included 14 drop-in events at key locations during the 2014 consultation on these management measures to allow stakeholders to share their views with marine Scotland and Scottish natural heritage representatives.
- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 July 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 20 August 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of whether the proposed marine protected areas that were announced on 11 June 2015 will lead to a major displacement and increased effort of scallop fishing in other areas.
Answer
The environmental report considered the implications of the various management approaches that were consulted on. This also considered the implication of 100% displacement of scallop dredging from each marine protected area. This report can be found at: http://www.gov.scot/Resource/0046/00464215.pdf
The amount of displacement that would occur is considered necessary to ensure that the conservation objectives of each marine protected area are furthered. It is inevitable that a reduction in the footprint of an activity within a marine protected area will result in an increase of effort in other areas unaffected by the management measures. The environmental report assumed that most effort would be displaced onto existing fishing grounds already modified by the activity. Discussion with the fishing industry in early 2014 indicated that there are few, if any, unexploited fishing grounds in Scottish inshore waters. The conclusion was that this displacement is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the environment outwith the marine protected areas.
- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 July 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 20 August 2015
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will allow fishing organisations a time extension to the current consultation period on the proposed marine protected areas that were announced on 11 June 2015 to allow them to have adequate time to prepare socioeconomic reports on what they consider will be the impact of the proposals.
Answer
Following requests from a number of stakeholders, Scottish Ministers extended the period for representations to 9 August 2015. Implementation of the new orders is now scheduled for 1 November 2015.