- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 03 June 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 16 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will consider introducing subordinate legislation under the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 to deter open fires in the countryside in light of recent hill and forest fires in the Highlands and, in particular, in the Ardnamurchan area
Answer
We do not consider that there is a need for further legislation to deter open fires in the countryside. The emphasis of Part 1 of the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 is that a person has access rights only if they are exercised responsibly. Section 2 of the act provides that in determining whether access rights are being exercised responsibly a person is to be presumed to be exercising access rights responsibly if they are exercised so as not to cause unreasonable interference with any of the rights, (whether access rights, rights associated with the ownership of land or any other) of any person.In determining whether a person is deemed not to be exercising access rights responsibly, regard is to be had to whether that person has disregarded the guidance on responsible conduct set out in the Access Code to be drawn up by Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) and incumbent on persons exercising access rights. The Access Code will address the issue of open fires. SNH are currently consulting on a draft code and the consultation closes on 30 June. Further to this, under section 12 of the act local authorities may, in relation to land in respect of which access rights are exercisable, make byelaws. These byelaw making powers will be able to address such issues as the lighting of open fires in the countryside.
- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 February 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 3 March 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what action it will take to provide GP care for the island of Coll if the present GP locum contract ends in April 2003, given the absence of a GP on the island from 15 to 22 February 2003 and the recent retirement of one of the locum GPs.
Answer
The Scottish Executive Health Department has put in place a package of measures to support the recruitment and retention of GPs in remote and rural areas. The provision of NHS services on the island of Coll is a matter for NHS Argyll and Clyde.
- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 February 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 3 March 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what action it will take to provide a permanent GP on the island of Coll, given the length of time that the post has been vacant.
Answer
NHS Argyll and Clyde has responsibility for the provision of NHS services on the island of Coll. The Scottish Executive Health Department has provided a package of measures to support the recruitment and retention of GPs in remote and rural areas.
- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 February 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 27 February 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-32809 by Ross Finnie on 13 January 2003, how the error in the sample data for the study "Public Attitudes Towards Wind Farms in Scotland" occurred and to what extent the study contributed to the expansion of wind farms in the Highlands and Islands.
Answer
The error arose from the inadvertent use of an inaccurate grid reference to map the population samples at one of the four sites surveyed. The data error covered one particular conclusion drawn from the survey. It did not, however, undermine the central conclusion.
- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 14 February 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 25 February 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what action it will take to ensure that an improved road gritting programme is implemented in the Highland Council area in order to ensure that pupils are able to access schools that remain open during snowy weather, in the light of recent experience in the area.
Answer
Winter maintenance of local roads is a matter for Highland Council and it is their responsibility to put in place adequate planning and resources to ensure that a road gritting programme is implemented. Winter maintenance of trunk roads in the Highland Council area is defined in BEAR Scotland's Winter Maintenance Plan, and is monitored by the independent Performance Audit Group.
- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 January 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 22 January 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has made an assessment of the potential impact of the proposed accession of 10 new member states to the European Union in 2004 and whether this enlargement will affect the quota shares of Scottish fishermen.
Answer
The Scottish Executive has monitored the progress of separate fisheries negotiations with each prospective EU member state but will not complete an assessment of all enlargement implications for fisheries before June 2003, when the Treaty of Accession is, for the first time, likely to be made available for detailed inspection. EU enlargement does not by itself give rise to any significant changes in national quota shares. Relative stability has been confirmed as the mechanism for quota allocations between all member states and it was used as a guiding principle of accession negotiations with each applicant country.A full report on the progress of the relevant fishery negotiations is publicly available on the Europa website:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/negotiations/chapters/chap8/index.
- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 16 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 10 January 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive whether, with regard to the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Bill and the absolute right to buy, it is making budgetary provision to cover any costs which might arise under the European Convention on Human Rights, given the comments made in the Rural Development Committee's Stage 1 Report on the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Bill.
Answer
The Executive is opposed to an absolute right to buy, which would undermine the aim of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Bill to revitalise the tenanted sector. Our potential liability for compensation to overcome the risk of legal challenge under the European Convention of Human Rights arising from the creation of such a right is difficult to predict or control accurately, but we believe it could be substantial. Current Executive spending plans make no provision to meet such costs and no provision could be made without impacting on Executive support for other programmes. There is also a possibility, which we are investigating further, that such payments would in any case be unlikely to be acceptable for state aid purposes and would fail to meet EC requirements.For all of these reasons, we do not propose changes to our current spending plans to make budgetary provision for compensation that might be associated with the introduction of an absolute right to buy.
- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 16 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 7 January 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what percentage of farms being tenanted would represent a vibrant tenanted sector.
Answer
Our vision of a vibrant tenanted sector is not based on the percentage of farms being tenanted. It is instead reflected by a number of factors. We want landlords to be confident to let land and for there to be strong demand for tenanted land. We want to encourage increased investment in tenanted land by both landlords and tenants. It is also crucial that tenanted land is used in a way that best supports rural Scotland. In this regard, issues such as levels of income drawn from the land, employment opportunities and other benefits that arise for the surrounding community and the way in which the land supports the environment are particularly important.
- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 12 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how it is policing the ban on sprat fishing in the Forth Estuary between 31 October 2002 and 31 March 2003 in light of any reports that boats have been witnessed fishing illegally in the area.
Answer
The Scottish Fisheries Protection Agency has responsibility for the enforcement of this closure. The agency has no evidence of illegal activity taking place since the closure came into effect on 1 October 2002.
- Asked by: Jamie McGrigor, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 29 August 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 16 October 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive why Pentland Ferries, operating between St. Margaret's Hope and Gill's Bay, receives no tariff rebate subsidy (TRS), given that those who ship with Northlink do benefit from TRS.
Answer
Under the terms of the Highlands and Island Shipping Services Act 1960, Tariff Rebate Subsidy (TRS) is paid to eligible shipping operators wholly or mainly engaged in providing services to the Highlands and Islands in accordance with an undertaking, a draft of which has been laid before, and approved, by Parliament. No such undertaking relating to Pentland Ferries is in place. However, Pentland Ferries has recently applied for TRS for the transportation of livestock and its application is under consideration.