- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 02 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 16 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what arrangements the justiciary has in place to notify the police when a person (a) charged with and (b) convicted of (i) serious assault, (ii) rape, (iii) culpable homicide and (iv) murder is granted bail and what plans it has to issue guidance or directions to the justiciary on this issue.
Answer
The Scottish Court Service (SCS) notify the police in those cases where bail is granted to an accused person and a further condition, or conditions, is imposed in addition to the standard conditions irrespective of the type of offence. The police are informed by the SCS when an appellant is granted bail pending the determination of his appeal irrespective of the offence and of whether further conditions in addition to the standard conditions are imposed.Where the police require details of a particular bail application not covered by these arrangements, such information will be available from the police officer present in court where the accused appears from custody, or from the clerk of court when bail is granted or bail conditions are varied.On guidance or directions to the judiciary, I would refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-28832 today.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 02 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Elish Angiolini on 16 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has been the practice of prosecuting authorities not to attend bail appeals for people (a) charged with and (b) convicted of (i) serious assault, (ii) rape, (iii) culpable homicide and (iv) murder on the grounds that they had no statutory right to do so.
Answer
There has been no such practice.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 02 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 16 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether there is any backlog in the processing of appeals in respect of a (a) charge and (b) conviction for (i) serious assault, (ii) rape, (iii) culpable homicide and (iv) murder, and, if so, what this backlog is; what the average length of time is for an appeal to be considered in the High Court, and what plans it has to increase the number of judges to address the processing of appeals.
Answer
Information is not readily available in the form requested. However, I understand that 120 appeals against conviction under solemn procedure from both the High Court and Sheriff Court covering a wide range of seriousness await a hearing before the Court of Criminal Appeal. As at 30 June 2002 the average waiting period for this category of appeal was 32 term weeks.The programming of business before the Court of Criminal Appeal is a matter for the Lord Justice General. He has recently introduced a number of measures to improve the management of appeals. These are set out in the Act of Adjournal (Criminal Appeals) 2002 (SSI 2002/387), made on 23 August 2002.Among the reforms is the introduction of a procedural hearing in appeals against conviction or conviction and sentence. This hearing will take place before a single judge who will consider the state of preparation of the appeal. Cases which are ready to proceed will then be allocated to an Appeal Court hearing. It is anticipated that these hearings will improve the rate at which cases proceed through the appeals procedure. Procedural hearings will be fixed for all new solemn appeals progressively over the next few months. The first diet of hearings will take place this September, with cases that are ready to proceed to a full hearing coming before the Appeal Court before the end of the year. There are no plans to increase the overall number of judges at the present time.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 02 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 16 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will detail the reasons for the judge's decision to release Richard Crawford on bail and whether the DNA evidence involved was a factor in the judge's decision.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-28831.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 02 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 16 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what plans it has to issue guidance or directions to judges comparable to that issued to judges in England and Wales that the time it takes for an appeal to be heard should not be a strong enough reason to grant bail.
Answer
The Executive does not give guidance or directions to the judiciary on judicial matters. In Scotland, judicial decisions on bail are governed by the relevant legislation and case law.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 02 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 16 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the reasons for refusing a bail application after an (a) charge of and (b) conviction for (i) serious assault, (ii) rape, (iii) culpable homicide and (iv) murder and the name of the judge who considered the application are recorded and, if so, where and when.
Answer
The judiciary is not required by law to give reasons for its decisions to grant or refuse to grant bail. In any event, applications for bail are not categorised by type of offence.The identity of the judge who considered an application for bail is retained within the records of the Scottish Court Service.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 02 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 16 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what guidance or directions it has issued to the judges and prosecutors in respect of the impact of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) on bail applications, conditions and appeals.
Answer
On guidance and directions to judges, I would refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-28832 today. However, I understand that the Judicial Studies Committee provided comprehensive assistance to judges in their study of all aspects of the ECHR. Prosecutors received a three-day intensive course in human rights law and that included a component on bail issues.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 20 August 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 16 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how many (a) males and (b) females imprisoned for the (i) abduction, (ii) serious assault and (iii) murder of a child in each of the last 10 years have been considered for parole and how many have had their application (1) refused and (2) granted.
Answer
The information is not available in the form requested. Information relating to the release of prisoners on licence is published in the annual report of the Parole Board for Scotland. The board's report for 2001 was laid before the Parliament on 30 May 2002 and copies are available in the Parliament's Reference Centre.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 20 August 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 16 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how many and what percentage of road accidents have been caused by drug driving in each of the last 10 years and how many and what percentage have resulted in (a) injury and (b) death.
Answer
Data about injury road accidents are collected by the police and reported to the Scottish Executive using the STATS 19 statistical report form. These returns cover only accidents in which one or more people were injured: they do not cover damage only accidents. The returns do not provide information about the causes of the accidents.UK Government research, published in 2000, into the incidence of drugs in fatal road accident victims, found that illegal drugs were present in 18% of the sample group and that medicinal drugs were present in 6%. The presence of drugs is not, however, evidence of impairment nor of accident causation. The research report TRL495 is available on the TRL website at:
http://www.trl.co.uk/1024/mainpage.asp?page=141.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 20 August 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 16 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what the role of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister and Minister for Justice is in the parole hearing system and before a decision on a prisoners parole application has been decided upon.
Answer
The Scottish ministers are responsible under the terms of The Parole Board (Scotland) Rules 2001 (the Rules), made under sections 20(4) and (4A) of the Prisoners and Criminal Proceedings (Scotland) Act 1993 (as amended), for the referral of relevant cases to the Parole Board. On the referral of a case, the Scottish ministers are required by the rules to send to the board a dossier containing any information in writing or documents which they consider to be relevant to the case, including, wherever practicable, the information and documents specified in the Schedule to the rules.Long-term prisoners, that is persons sentenced to a term of four years or more, may be released on licence after serving one-half of the sentence, if this is recommended by the Parole Board. The Parole Board makes its decisions on whether or not to recommend the early release on licence of such prisoners in private, under Part III of the rules. If the board recommends the early release of a long-term prisoner who has been sentenced to less than 10 years, the Scottish ministers are obliged, by law, to release the prisoner. In the case of a prisoner sentenced to 10 years or more, the Scottish ministers currently exercise discretion over whether or not to accept the board's recommendation. Under provisions contained in Part 4 of the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill it is proposed to remove that discretion so that Scottish ministers will be obliged to follow the board's recommendation in all cases.In the case of life prisoners, when the punishment part of the life sentence has expired, an oral hearing is arranged by the Parole Board, under part IV of the rules, to consider whether or not the prisoner requires to continue to be confined for the protection of the public. Hearings normally take place in the establishment in which the prisoner is detained. In the dossier of information that is sent to the board in such cases there is normally a document recording the Scottish ministers' views on whether or not the prisoner should continue to be confined; and at the oral hearing the Scottish ministers are represented, normally, by an official of the Justice Department and a representative of the Scottish Prison Service. The prisoner, who is entitled to be present at the hearing, may also be represented.Where, in the light of the information provided to it and the views expressed at the oral hearing, the Parole Board is satisfied that a life prisoner no longer requires to continue to be confined for the protection of the public, it will direct the prisoner's release on life licence. The Scottish ministers are obliged, by law, to release the prisoner on life licence.