- Asked by: Donald Gorrie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 11 August 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 5 September 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive which organisations and individuals are represented on its policy development group considering possible legislation in respect of vulnerable adults; how they were selected, and by whom.
Answer
The Vulnerable Adults Steering Group is being set up to offer advice to the Scottish Executive on the development of policy on the protection of vulnerable adults. Statutory bodies with an interest and organisations with relevant experience in the field have been invited to nominate representatives. Initial invitations were issued to the following organisations:
Age Concern Scotland
Apex Scotland
Association of Chief Police Officers
Association of Directors of Social Work
Association of Scottish Police Superintendents
British Association of Social Workers
Community and District Nursing Association
Enable
Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland
NHS Health Scotland
Office of the Public Guardian
Scottish Association for Mental Health
Scottish Commission for the Regulation of Care
Scottish Consortium for Learning Disability
Scottish Law Commission
Vulnerable Adults Alliance Scotland.
The first steering group meeting will be held on 14 September, when members will be invited to consider the need for additional representation. Other existing groups, including The same as you? National Implementation Group and the Autism Spectrum Disorder Reference Group will also contribute to the development of policy in this area.
- Asked by: Donald Gorrie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 12 August 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 30 August 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how many service users, their carers and parents are represented on The same as you? National Implementation Group and short-life working groups on children, employment, hospital closure, day centres and advocacy.
Answer
The same as you? National
ImplementationGroup has 25 members, seven of whom are peoplewho use services or family carers. In addition, implementation is supported by aNational Users and Carers Group which has 18 members, 12 of whom are people whouse services or family carers. The membership of short-life working groups has variedover the life of each group depending on the issues being considered and the availabilityof members. However, on average the number of members for each group who were peoplewho use services or family carers was as follows:
Hospital Closure, 2
Employment, 3
(Both groups completed theirwork in December 2003.)
Advocacy, 4
Children, 3
Day services, 2.
Members who represent voluntaryorganisations on the groups may also have personal experience of caring for a personwith learning disabilities. All group members who have a learning disability aresupported at meetings by support workers from the organisations they represent.
In addition to actual representationon the groups, many people who use services, carers, and parents contribute to thework of the groups through a variety of means, such as workshops, conferences orquestionnaires.
- Asked by: Donald Gorrie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 10 August 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 19 August 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-17721 by Malcolm Chisholm on 28 July 2005, which departments will be involved in determining the use of the increased resources available for the implementation of the Russell Commission's recommendations and what the timetable is for an announcement on their allocation.
Answer
Scottish ministers will determine the use of consequential resources. The Minister for Communities is examining how implementation of the Russell Commission’s recommendations could support Scottish Executive volunteering policy. An announcement on this will be made by the end of the year.
- Asked by: Donald Gorrie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 July 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 17 August 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what sums were allocated to each local authority for services related to autism for each of the last five years and what information it has on how much has each local authority spent from its allocation and how any unallocated or unspent monies were utilised.
Answer
Local authority Grant Aided Expenditure, including allocations for community care for adults with disabilities, is published on the Scottish Executive website at:
www.scotland.gov.uk/stats/gaestats.
Grant Aided Expenditure is funded by a combination of central government funding through Aggregate External Finance and funding raised by local authorities including council tax revenue. Local authorities are free to spend above or below the Grant Aided Expenditure level, according to their own priorities. The money that local authorities receive through Aggregate External Finance is, in the main, provided by way of a block grant and is not allocated to specific services. Grant Aided Expenditure is allocated to individual local authorities on the basis of a needs-based distribution formula agreed with the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities.
Information on local authority spend on services for people with autistic spectrum disorders is not detailed separately from spend on services for people with learning disabilities. Spend on community care services for adults aged 18 to 64 with learning disabilities is detailed by local authority in the table.
Net Revenue Expenditure ( £000) | 1999-2000 | 2000-01 | 2001-02 | 2002-031 | 2003-04 |
Scotland | 137,955 | 143,662 | 164,686 | 230,357 | 241,366 |
Aberdeen City | 7,535 | 8,093 | 10,232 | 12,728 | 13,853 |
Aberdeenshire | 8,384 | 8,568 | 10,691 | 14,193 | 13,847 |
Angus | 1,749 | 2,158 | 2,115 | 3,876 | 4,707 |
Argyll and Bute | 3,408 | 3,560 | 3,943 | 5,864 | 4,596 |
Clackmannanshire | 677 | 622 | 512 | 1,148 | 1,202 |
Dumfries and Galloway | 3,012 | 3,128 | 3,226 | 5,814 | 5,708 |
Dundee City | 4,098 | 4,547 | 4,814 | 6,344 | 6,276 |
East Ayrshire | 2,475 | 2,393 | 2,893 | 5,149 | 5,189 |
East Dunbartonshire | 1,242 | 4,466 | 5,099 | 4,957 | 3,845 |
East Lothian | 2,544 | 2,831 | 3,135 | 4,850 | 3,566 |
East Renfrewshire | 2,101 | 2,303 | 2,274 | 2,132 | 2,065 |
Edinburgh, City of | 15,411 | 15,755 | 17,564 | 22,094 | 22,184 |
Eilean Siar | 743 | 871 | 977 | 1,308 | 1,555 |
Falkirk | 2,221 | 2,150 | 2,211 | 1,041 | 4,760 |
Fife | 11,389 | 6,694 | 9,613 | 12,691 | 11,988 |
Glasgow City | 18,864 | 19,315 | 23,531 | 38,126 | 33,842 |
Highland | 4,291 | 3,686 | 4,737 | 8,943 | 10,518 |
Inverclyde | 1,464 | 1,720 | 1,785 | 3,063 | 3,152 |
Midlothian | 2,628 | 2,880 | 3,022 | 5,111 | 4,655 |
Moray | 2,620 | 2,916 | 3,126 | 3,882 | 2,110 |
North Ayrshire | 2,617 | 2,764 | 3,244 | 4,537 | 4,391 |
North Lanarkshire 2 | 9,675 | 11,589 | 13,023 | 7,577 | 23,630 |
Orkney Islands | 381 | 408 | 467 | 1,009 | 932 |
Perth and Kinross | 3,620 | 4,158 | 4,439 | 6,800 | 6,826 |
Renfrewshire | 2,901 | 3,556 | 3,327 | 4,344 | 5,072 |
Scottish Borders | 2,576 | 3,289 | 3,739 | 6,699 | 6,758 |
Shetland Islands | 1,086 | 984 | 1,338 | 1,623 | 1,949 |
South Ayrshire | 2,945 | 3,507 | 4,015 | 7,117 | 5,286 |
South Lanarkshire | 7,414 | 6,897 | 7,366 | 12,776 | 13,142 |
Stirling | 1,727 | 1,738 | 1,896 | 4,934 | 3,964 |
West Dunbartonshire | 2,477 | 2,372 | 1,799 | 3,792 | 4,412 |
West Lothian | 3,680 | 3,743 | 4,533 | 5,835 | 5,386 |
Source: LFR 3 returns.
Notes:
1. Figures prior to 2002-03 exclude home care.
2. North Lanarkshire – high increase in 2003-04 due to change in the council’s treatment of Supporting People income and expenditure.
- Asked by: Donald Gorrie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 July 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Peter Peacock on 16 August 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what action it is taking in response to the recent report from the Royal Society of Chemistry, Sniffing out the Bunsen Burners, highlighting an apparent shortage of chemistry teachers in schools.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S2W-17951 on 16 August 2005. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Donald Gorrie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 01 July 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 28 July 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what Scotlands share will be of the budget allocation for implementing the Russell Commissions recommendations and whether all of this sum will be used to support volunteering and voluntary organisations in Scotland.
Answer
The increase to the ScottishBudget as a result of the allocations announced by the Chancellor in Budget 2005for the implementation of the Russell Commission's recommendations are as follows:£0.855 million in 2005-06; £2.564 million in 2006-07, and £6.36 million in 2007-08.It will be for Scottish ministers to determine the use of these resources in duecourse.
- Asked by: Donald Gorrie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 June 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 29 June 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has any plans for more Executive bodies to hold their meetings in public in the same way as the Scottish Freedom of Information Working Group.
Answer
Existing guidance for Executive sponsored bodies contains a number of provisions aimed at ensuring openness and accountability. These include requirements to:
Hold open board meetings where practical;
· Hold annual open meetings;
· Make publicly available summary reports and/or minutes of meetings;
· Consult and take evidence from stakeholders;
· Publish annual reports and accounts, and
· Make effective use of the internet.
In addition, bodies are also subject to the requirements of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act, and a wide range of information is available as part of the Scottish Executive’s Publication Scheme.
- Asked by: Donald Gorrie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 June 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 23 June 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how it will ensure that support organisations, which are in the process of appeal in relation to their registration with the Care Commission, are not deprived of local authority funding for services as a result of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2001 (Payments Out of Grants for Housing Support Services) Amendment Order 2005 whilst the appeal process is ongoing.
Answer
The order requires providersof housing support services which are also care services and which are paid bya local authority out of grants provided by the Scottish ministers under theHousing (Scotland) Act 2001, to be registered under the Regulation of Care(Scotland) Act 2001.
Under the Regulation of Care(Scotland) Act 2001 and its associated regulations, those service providers whoare deemed to be registered with the Care Commission will continue to be deemedto be registered until an appeal is decided. Supporting People funding shouldnot therefore be withdrawn in those circumstances, ahead of a decision on theappeal.
- Asked by: Donald Gorrie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 18 May 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 3 June 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what the potential adverse impacts were of the Kelvin valley route for the proposed upgrade of the A80 identified during the course of the scheme assessment and in the Consultation Forum in 1996 which it was unable to mitigate successfully and which led to the Minister for Transport's decision on the route.
Answer
There were a range of adverse impacts on ecology, noise levels, water quality, cultural heritage and the landscape character of the area associated with the Kelvin Valley Route which could not be successfully mitigated.
- Asked by: Donald Gorrie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 25 May 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Euan Robson on 2 June 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what discussions it has had with local authorities to ensure that the greatest possible use is made of schools after school hours, at the weekends and in holidays by sports, cultural and community groups, with no charge or low charges.
Answer
We encourage the fullest possible use of all local authority resources, including school facilities. It is, though, for the local authorities to determine whether or what to charge for community use of such facilities.