- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 03 September 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 11 September 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive how many police officers are involved in enforcing traffic laws on roads on a daily basis.
Answer
All uniformed officersare authorised to enforce road traffic laws, for example, seatbelts, mobile phonesand road traffic collisions and so the number of police officersinvolved in this activity will vary from day-to-day. The road policing units ofScotland’s eight forces have a total complement of841 officers, broken down as follows:
| Central Scotland Police | 43 |
| Dumfries and Galloway Constabulary | 43 |
| Grampian Police | 84 |
| Fife Constabulary | 56 |
| Lothian and Borders Police | 155 |
| Northern Constabulary | 25 |
| Strathclyde Police | 364 |
| Tayside Police | 71 |
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 13 August 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 10 September 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W-79 by John Swinney on 5 June 2007, whether baseline information will be provided and clear quantifiable targets set to allow effective parliamentary scrutiny of performance in achieving ministers’ ambitions for simpler, smaller government.
Answer
We will establisha baseline against which progress can be measured. Our ambition for a simpler,smaller government is not only about numbers, but about removing unnecessaryduplication and establishing structures that can support and drive the deliveryof joined-up strategic outcomes. We are taking a strategic look across thedelivery landscape of Scottish public services to consider what structures willbest address the challenges and meet our strategic objectives.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 13 August 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 10 September 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W-79 by John Swinney on 5 June 2007, what additional information can be provided about the practical implications of ministers’ ambitions for simpler, smaller government.
Answer
As I announced on24 May 2007, we intend toachieve a simpler, smaller Government in Scotland through de-cluttering and simplifyingthe public service landscape. We have already reduced the number of GovernmentDepartments and Scottish ministers. We are taking forward our ManifestoCommitments in this area. The development of an outcome approach for local governmenttogether with clarity about the role of agencies and non-departmental public bodieswill also be crucial elements of our approach. We will provide Parliament withfurther details later this year on the detailed implications of our approach.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 13 August 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 10 September 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will list all the initiatives involving additional expenditure that it has announced in Session 3 of the Parliament, showing the projected costs of each for the next three years.
Answer
The Scottish Governmentwill publish in year changes to spending programmes in the usual fashion in theautumn and spring budget revisions. This will include the costs of policy announcementswith spending implications. The consequences of such announcements will also beset out in the Strategic Spending Review.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 31 July 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 6 September 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive whether Scottish Water has indicated any possible difficulties in providing water and sewerage connections to the new houses in the Scottish Borders referred to in the Waverley railway project business case and what the projected costs would be of providing the necessary connections.
Answer
Scottish Water isfully funded to provide the strategic infrastructure required for all anticipatednew development during the current investment period.
The Provision ofWater and Sewerage Services (Reasonable Cost) (Scotland) Regulations 2006 introduceda legal basis for the calculation of the reasonable cost contribution to be madeby Scottish Water and developers towards the cost of providing local “Part 2” and“Part 3” connections to its networks. Scottish Water will provide a reasonable costcontribution towards the developers’ costs of funding “Part 2” and “Part 3” infrastructure.This reasonable cost contribution to new connections is available towards the totalcosts of both local water mains and sewers, and all other “Part 2” and “Part 3”assets.
The projected costsfor providing the necessary connections will depend on the timing of the house buildingconstruction programme and the contribution to be made to such connections by therelevant developers.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 August 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 6 September 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it is committed to ensuring that every newly built home and office will be of the highest standard, as set out in a 2006 SNP press release entitled It’s Time for a Greener Scotland, and, if so, what standard it will apply and what practical steps ministers have taken to progress such a commitment.
Answer
I have asked Dr PaulStollard, Chief Executive of the Scottish Building Standards Agency (SBSA), to answer.His response is as follows:
The agency are currentlyworking to the 2007 SNP manifesto commitments “It’s time to move forward”. The aimsare broadly consistent with those in the publication entitled It’s Time for a GreenerScotland. An expert panel has been set up to produce a low carbon building standardsstrategy and this will be published later in the year. It is intended that thisdocument will provide a route map to low carbon buildings, with an aspiration towardszero carbon buildings.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 23 August 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 6 September 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W-2274 by Stewart Stevenson on 7 August 2007, what percentage of passengers using Gourock station are considered, in its interpretation of the HITRANS data, to be users of ferry services; what the evidential basis is for this interpretation, and whether this interpretation has been endorsed by the author of the HITRANS report.
Answer
The HITRANS surveywas focussed on ferry users rather than users of Gourock station. It cannot thereforebe used, on its own, to derive estimates of the percentage of passengers using Gourockstation who are ferry users. It can be used to derive estimates of the percentageof those using the Gourock to Dunoon ferry who arrive at or depart from Gourockby train. On this latter basis, the survey showed that 56 of the 179 passengersinterviewed on the Gourock to Dunoon service had used the train to arrive at Gourockor planned to use the train for their onward journey from Gourock. This represents31% of passengers using the service which is twice the figure used by Western Ferriesin preparing the news release it issued on 18 July 2007. This interpretation of the survey results has been endorsed by the author of the HITRANS report.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 23 August 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 6 September 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W-2278 by Stewart Stevenson on 7 August 2007, how leakage of subsidy from passenger-only customers to those travelling with vehicles is prevented when the vessel involved also conveys commercial vehicles and private cars and their passengers.
Answer
I am satisfied thatthe vehicle element of the current Cowal Ferries Ltd service on the Gourock to Dunoonroute does not generate an additional subsidy requirement. Indeed, the revenue fromvehicles carried exceeds the additional costs involved in running a vehicle, asopposed to passenger only service, using the vessels currently deployed on the route.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 30 August 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 6 September 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive what practical measures it will take to reduce the incidence of alcoholic liver disease in West Dunbartonshire to the Scottish average or below.
Answer
The ScottishGovernment is committed to tackling alcohol problems in Scotland. Over £10 millionwas made available to NHS boards in Scotland in 2007-08 specifically to tackle alcoholproblems in their area, in addition to their general financial allocations. Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS board wasawarded almost £3 million.
Alcohol and drugs action teams are tasked with theresponsibility for the strategic planning and co-ordination of action to tacklealcohol misuse in their area.
The ScottishGovernment will continue to take forward the commitments set out in the UpdatedPlan for Action on Alcohol Problems, but to complement that action, a longerterm strategic approach is required if we are to tackle Scotland’s complexrelationship with alcohol, and deliver sustainable change in attitudes.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 30 August 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 6 September 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive what higher education participation rate it believes is necessary to meet the 2007 SNP manifesto commitment of “widening access to higher and further education in Scotland encouraging and creating opportunities for people who may not have been able to access continuing education previously”.
Answer
We will continue totake action to promote further and higher education, and have already announcedsteps to remove the graduate endowment fee so that access to higher education isopen to those who have the ability rather than the ability to pay. However, we donot believe it is helpful to express participation in terms of a target rate. Unlikethe position in England there has never been a target rate for participation.