- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 10 June 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 24 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the selected monitoring methodology at the proposed water treatment plant at Milngavie meets the world's best practice and reflects an accurate assessment of the prevalence of water-borne cryptosporidium.
Answer
The recovery rate for cryptosporidium oocysts using the monitoring methodology proposed for Milngavie is around 50%. However, the methodology proposed is the best currently available.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 10 June 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 24 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what maximum level of cryptosporidium is allowable in drinking water supplies under relevant Scottish guidelines.
Answer
There is no maximum level set for cryptosporidium in The Water Supply (Water Quality) (Scotland) Regulations. The regulations require that water does not contain any micro-organism or parasite at a concentration which would constitute a potential danger to human health.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 10 June 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 24 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what minimal level of cryptosporidium removal is required under relevant legislation and European directives for water treatment plants.
Answer
Neither the European Drinking Water Directive nor The Water Supply (Water Quality) (Scotland) Regulations set performance criteria for cryptosporidium removal at water treatment works. Where there is an identified risk of cryptosporidium entering a water supply, The Cryptosporidum (Scottish Water) Directions 2002 require that a treatment process and operating protocols, appropriate for the identified risk, are put in place to minimise that risk.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 10 June 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 24 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what plans Scottish Water has in place to rectify any failures of the proposed water treatment plant at Milngavie to meet specified removal efficiency criteria.
Answer
Scottish Water has carried out extensive trials on pilot plant to check the performance of the water treatment process proposed for Milngavie. However, should the full scale plant fail to meet all the necessary regulatory standards, then the Drinking Water Quality Regulator will require remedial measures to be put in place.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 10 June 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 24 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether treatment technology similar to that selected for the proposed water treatment plant at Milngavie has been used elsewhere in the United Kingdom and, if so, what the track record of any such plants has been.
Answer
The treatment technology selected for the proposed Milngavie water treatment works is widely used across the industry. The effectiveness of the process, like all treatment processes, is dependent on the monitoring and control regimes put in place. Scottish Water plans to operate the new works in accordance with industry best practice.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 10 June 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 24 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the selected treatment technology for the proposed water treatment plant at Milngavie has been assessed by any United Kingdom standards agency or received certification from any United States state or federal agency.
Answer
There are no certification schemes covering the efficiency of water treatment processes. The highly variable nature of raw water means that the treatment technology appropriate for a particular treatment works has to be selected by carrying out trials on the raw water being used for that supply. The efficiency of any processes is also dependent on the operating regime put in place.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Peter Peacock on 29 May 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how many reports have been finalised by (a) the Commissioner for Local Administration in Scotland and (b) the Scottish Parliamentary Commissioner and Health Service Ombudsman, broken down by (i) parliamentary constituency and (ii) local authority area, in each of the last three years.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-25988.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Peter Peacock on 29 May 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how many complaints have been received by (a) the Commissioner for Local Administration in Scotland and (b) the Scottish Parliamentary Commissioner and Health Service Ombudsman, broken down by (i) parliamentary constituency and (ii) local authority area, in each of the last three years.
Answer
Information about the number of complaints that are received, or how many reports have been finalised, by (a) the Commissioner for Local Administration in Scotland, (b) the Scottish Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and (c) the Health Service Commissioner for Scotland, is not held centrally.Details of complaints made during the years 1999-2000 and 2000-01 are contained in each office-holder's relevant annual reports, copies of which are available in the Parliament's Reference Centre. Equivalent details for the year 2001-02 would be held by each of the relevant offices.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 08 April 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 28 May 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how public transport links to the Rosyth ferry terminal will be improved from (a) the Lothians, (b) Strathclyde, (c) Fife and (d) elsewhere in Scotland.
Answer
Transport Challenge Funding and Public Transport Fund grants totalling £11.6 million have been made to Fife Council to support additional rail services between south Fife and Edinburgh, and to make improvements to rail services and stations at Rosyth and Inverkeithing. In addition, grants of £4.7 million have been made to Fife and City of Edinburgh Councils to develop park-and-ride and bus priority measures between Fife and Edinburgh.There are currently no new public transport services to Strathclyde or other parts of Scotland. However, dedicated bus and taxi services at the ferry terminal will link to the wider Scottish bus and rail networks through Inverkeithing, Dunfermline and Edinburgh.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 08 April 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 27 May 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what plans it has to improve the integration of public transport services between Edinburgh and Dunbartonshire.
Answer
The Scottish Executive is supporting improved public transport links between Dunbartonshire and Glasgow which is a major interchange for bus services from Buchanan Street Bus Station or regular rail services to other parts of Scotland, including Edinburgh from Queen Street or Central Station. The improvements to the Dunbartonshire to Glasgow links include the Baillieston to Faifley Quality Bus Corridor, and doubling the frequency of rail services between Milngavie and Glasgow as part of the Larkhall-Milngavie rail project.