- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 20 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-24879 by Ross Finnie on 7 May 2002, whether there is any further information concerning drinking water quality in the EH9 postcode, particularly during August 2002.
Answer
Postcode EH9 covers two water quality zones, one supplied from Alnwickhill water treatment works and the other from Fairmilehead.The August results for the zone supplied by Alnwickhill show that one sample contained 101.6 microgrammes per litre of trihalomethanes (THMs). However, the standard for THMs set in the Water Supply (Water Quality) (Scotland) Regulations 1990, of 100 microgrammes per litre, is based on a three month rolling average. The results for June and July were 95.1 microgrammes per litre and 98.5 microgrammes per litre, respectively. The THM standard, based on the three month rolling average, has therefore not been breached.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 20 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how many times cryptosporidium was detected in the Glasgow water supply in the past twelve months (a) above 0 oocysts per 100 litres, (b) above 1 oocysts per 100 litres and (c) above 10 oocysts per 100 litres.
Answer
During the 12-month period from 1 September 2001 to 31 August 2002, Scottish Water carried out 730 tests for cryptosporidium on treated water samples taken from Milngavie treatment works. A total of 243 of these tests were positive.The Cryptosporidium Direction requires Scottish Water to report results as "oocysts per 10 litres". At no time did the level of cryptosporidium in the water leaving Milngavie exceed 1 oocyst per 10 litres. The maximum number of oocysts detected in the treated water at Milngavie was 0.353 oocysts per 10 Litres and this was reported on 3 August 2002.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 20 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive who is responsible for issuing consent for the construction of sustainable urban drainage systems
Answer
Each regulatory authority has its own powers, and thus formal approval for a drainage system may be needed from the planning authority (planning permission); the building control authority (building warrant); Scottish Water (drainage construction consent); the roads authority (road construction consent); and from Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) (consent to discharge - if required - or conditional prohibition notice).The developer is responsible for the construction of a sustainable drainage system and for ensuring it meets the requirements of the design manual prepared by the Sustainable Urban Drainage Scottish Working Party. As described above, depending on the circumstances the developer may have to ensure that the appropriate local authority, SEPA and Scottish Water are content with the design of the system.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 20 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what expectations it has in relation to the take-up rate for sustainable urban drainage systems.
Answer
Given that sustainable urban drainage systems are common practice in all new developments, the expectation is that the figures quoted in the answer given to question S1W-29075 today, will increase. The SNIFFER project referred to in that reply has estimated there will be some 1,600 SUDS sites in Scotland by January 2006.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 20 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what evidence it has that Planning Advice Note 61 has been effective in promoting drainage systems which are sustainable and mitigate against flooding.
Answer
Planning Advice Note 61, Planning and Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems was published in July 2001. It gives advice on the role of the planning system in helping to deliver sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS) as advocated in the SUDS Design Manual for Scotland and Northern Ireland.The SUDS Monitoring Project, funded by the Scotland and Northern Ireland Forum for Environmental Research (SNIFFER), shows 3,913 systems installed on 769 sites during the period between mid-1995 and the beginning of 2002. Since most of these will predate the publication of the Planning Advice Note (PAN), it is not possible to say what effect publication of the PAN has made.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 20 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what cryptosporidium levels were monitored between January and August 2002 in treated water from the Milngavie water treatment plant.
Answer
Scottish Water carried out 484 tests for cryptosporidium on the treated water at Milngavie treatment works between January 2002 and August 2002. One hundred and sixty-seven of these test results were positive. The maximum level of Cryptosporidium detected in the treated water over the period was 0.353 oocysts per 10 litres and this was reported on Saturday 3 August 2002.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 20 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what action will be taken to ensure that the water industry regulatory framework will be operated in the best interests of customers.
Answer
The Drinking Water Quality Regulator, the Water Industry Commissioner and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency each have a duty to ensure that the regulatory framework is operated in accordance with the requirements of the Parliament.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 19 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether Scottish Water complied with the provisions of section 17(6)(a) of the Water Supply (Water Quality) (Scotland) Regulations 2001 during the recent outbreak of cryptosporidium in the Glasgow area
Answer
Regulation 17 of the Water Supply (Water Quality) (Scotland) Regulations does not come into force until 25 December 2003. There is no equivalent provision in the Water Supply (Water Quality) (Scotland) Regulations 1990.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 05 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 19 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has ascertained the cause of the cryptosporidiosis outbreak in the greater Glasgow area in early August 2002.
Answer
There was no outbreak of cryptosporidiosis in Glasgow in August 2002. The monitoring system detected increased levels of cryptosporidium in the public water supply and precautionary advice was issued to boil the water before use. This precautionary advice may have prevented an outbreak.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 05 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 19 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive who will be responsible for the implementation of the recommendations arising from reports by the Drinking Water Quality Regulator, Water Industry Commissioner, Expert Group on Cryptosporidium in Water Supplies, Incident Control Teams and Ad Hoc Group of Ministers concerning the Glasgow water incident.
Answer
The report of the Ad Hoc Group Of Ministers contains eight recommendations. They will be implemented by a number of bodies, including Scottish Water, NHS boards, the Drinking Water Quality Regulator and the Scottish Executive.Similarly, the various other reports can be expected to identify the bodies responsible for implementing specific recommendations. The Ad Hoc Group of Ministers concluded that where recommendations are made by an Incident or Outbreak Control Team, copies of the team's report should be sent routinely to the Scottish Executive. Mechanisms should also be introduced to ensure that such recommendations are given due consideration by the agencies to which they are directed. The Scottish Executive should be informed of action taken (or not) in response to the recommendations.