- Asked by: David McLetchie, MSP for Edinburgh Pentlands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 23 December 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 19 January 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W-17745 by Nicola Sturgeon on 19 November 2008, how many appeals against pay banding have been lodged following assimilation under Agenda for Change, broken down by NHS board.
Answer
Under Agenda for Change staff have the right to request a review of their matching or evaluation outcome. As nearly all staff have been placed on the new pay system, boards are now turning their attention to completing reviews as early in 2009 as possible.
The data collected by the Scottish Government does not detail the number of specific review requests submitted but rather the two key statistics for management purposes:
1. the number of posts for which review requests have been received (i.e. if three people doing the same job in a given area submit review requests this would only count as a request to review one post) and;
2. the number of postholders affected by review requests (i.e. following on from the example above, if there are five people in total doing that same job in a given area, then the outcome of the three review requests submitted will affect all five staff).
A number of review requests have already been processed with boards around the country at different stages in handling. However, the following table details the total number of posts for which review requests have been received and the number of postholders potentially affected by these reviews. The figures are taken at 30 November 2008 and broken down by NHS board.
NHS Board | Number of Posts for which Review Requests Have Been Received | Number of Postholders Potentially Affected by the Review Request |
Ayrshire and Arran | 1,096 | 2,717 |
Borders | 427 | 797 |
Dumfries and Galloway | 485 | 2,728 |
Fife | 558 | 1,688 |
Forth Valley | 447 | 1,155 |
Golden Jubilee National Hospital | 39 | 103 |
Grampian | 1,617 | 4,083 |
Greater Glasgow and Clyde | 3,586 | 9,403 |
Highland | 804 | 2,374 |
Lanarkshire | 2,524 | 2,524 |
Lothian | 2,152 | 11,091 |
NHS24 | 21 | 57 |
NHS Education for Scotland | 108 | 149 |
NHS Health | 20 | 35 |
NHS National Services Scotland | 485 | 1,525 |
NHS Quality Improvement Scotland | 30 | 64 |
Orkney | 121 | 160 |
Scottish Ambulance Service | 94 | 3,822 |
Shetland | 71 | 99 |
State Hospital | 86 | 322 |
Tayside | 1,132 | 5,366 |
Western Isles | 38 | 42 |
Total | 15,941 | 50,310 |
- Asked by: David McLetchie, MSP for Edinburgh Pentlands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 23 December 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 19 January 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W-17745 by Nicola Sturgeon on 19 November 2008, how many retired NHS staff are awaiting assimilation under Agenda for Change, broken down by NHS board.
Answer
Assimilation is being taken forward in partnership locally and I know that existing staff have generally been prioritised for assimilation over retirees. There will, therefore, be retirees waiting for assimilation in many parts of the country. The Scottish Government does not collect data on the numbers involved but these are likely to be relatively small in the context of the larger process.
- Asked by: David McLetchie, MSP for Edinburgh Pentlands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 23 December 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 19 January 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W–17745 by Nicola Sturgeon on 19 November 2008, how many appeals against pay banding are outstanding following assimilation under Agenda for Change, broken down by NHS board.
Answer
Under Agenda for Change staff have the right to request a review of their matching or evaluation outcome. As nearly all staff have been placed on the new pay system, boards are now turning their attention to completing reviews as early in 2009 as possible.
The data collected by the Scottish Government does not detail the number of specific review requests submitted but rather the two key statistics for management purposes:
1. the number of posts for which review requests have been received (i.e. if three people doing the same job in a given area submit review requests this would only count as a request to review one post), and
2. the number of postholders affected by review requests (i.e. following on from the example above, if there are five people in total doing that same job in a given area, then the outcome of the three review requests submitted will affect all five staff).
A number of review requests have already been processed with boards around the country at different stages in handling. Figures are available for the number of postholders affected by the reviews which have already been processed and this therefore allows a figure to be calculated for the number of postholders who are left and are, therefore, potentially affected by the outcome of outstanding review requests. These figures are presented in the following table. The figures are taken at 30 November 2008 and broken down by NHS board.
Number of Postholders who could be Affected by the Outcome of Outstanding Review Requests
NHS Board | |
Ayrshire and Arran | 2,167 |
Borders | 5 |
Dumfries and Galloway | 2,105 |
Fife | 1,564 |
Forth Valley | 1,022 |
Golden Jubilee National Hospital | 55 |
Grampian | 140 |
Greater Glasgow and Clyde | 9,403 |
Highland | 1,683 |
Lanarkshire | 1,586 |
Lothian | 8,754 |
NHS24 | 30 |
NHS Education for Scotland | 0 |
NHS Health | 15 |
NHS National Services Scotland | 361 |
NHS Quality Improvement Scotland | 7 |
Orkney | 0 |
Scottish Ambulance Service | 0 |
Shetland | 35 |
State Hospital | 322 |
Tayside | 4,321 |
Western Isles | 20 |
Total | 33,601 |
- Asked by: David McLetchie, MSP for Edinburgh Pentlands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 18 November 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 3 December 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive how much of its £500 million contribution to the Edinburgh trams project has already been spent, broken down by (a) date of release and (b) size and purpose of each payment.
Answer
The Scottish Government pays a proportionate share (91.7%) of the City of Edinburgh Council''s expenditure on development and implementation costs for the Edinburgh Tram project. A total of £206.881 million has been drawn down to date as set out in table 1.
Table 1
Edinburgh Tram Expenditure | 2002-03 (£000) | 2003-04 (£000) | 2004-05 (£000) | 2005-06 (£000) |
Month of Payment |
June | 0 | 0 | 121,369 | 4,271,101 |
July | 0 | 0 | 578,554 | 0 |
August | 29,656 | 528,096 | 471,370 | 0 |
September | 0 | 1,684,648 | 615,262 | 0 |
October | 331,678 | 687,422 | 0 | 0 |
November | 0 | 554,906 | 114,731 | 859,387 |
December | 311,949 | 376,207 | 291,646 | 0 |
January | 180,575 | 909,258 | 2,035,697 | 0 |
February | 140,871 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
March | 332,021 | 389,423 | 141,786 | 1,632,190 |
April | 486,807 | 1,101,081 | 120,656 | 5,368,775 |
May | 0 | 925,222 | 1,917.781 | 1,369,172 |
June | 218,985 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Totals | 2,032,542 | 7,156,263 | 6,408,853 | 13,500,625 |
Edinburgh Tram Expenditure | 2006-07 (£000) | 2007-08 (£000) | 2008-09 To date (£000) |
Month of Payment |
June | 0 | 0 | 14,128,172 |
July | 0 | 0 | 9,049,325 |
August | 5,316,445 | 0 | 43,086,443 |
September | 0 | 0 | 9,957,687 |
October | 12,109,729 | 0 | 1,462,720 |
November | 0 | 0 | 2,480,528 |
December | 6,972,186 | 0 | 0 |
January | 0 | 0 | 0 |
February | 0 | 0 | 0 |
March | 1,234,591 | 0 | 0 |
April | 0 | 0 | 14,524,929 |
May | 0 | 69,918,838 | 5,863,750 |
June | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Totals | 25,632,951 | 69,918,838 | 82,231,111 |
- Asked by: David McLetchie, MSP for Edinburgh Pentlands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 18 November 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 1 December 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive how payment of the remainder of its £500 million contribution to the Edinburgh trams project will be phased, specifying anticipated (a) timescale, (b) size and (c) purpose of each payment.
Answer
The detailed phasing of expenditure is for City of Edinburgh Council to manage. The Scottish Government will continue to meet its agreed obligation of 91.7% of expenditure, subject to annual limits of £120 million in this financial year and £149 million in next financial year.
- Asked by: David McLetchie, MSP for Edinburgh Pentlands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 18 November 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 1 December 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive whether its contribution to the Edinburgh trams project will remain at £500 million if Phase 1b does not go ahead.
Answer
The Scottish Government will pay the agreed 91.7% of costs expended by CEC on lines 1a and 1b up to a limit of £500 million. This arrangement is not altered by the status of Line 1b.
- Asked by: David McLetchie, MSP for Edinburgh Pentlands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 November 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 20 November 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it intends to legislate on the subject of high hedges and, if so, when.
Answer
We are in the process of investigating options “ including legislative ones “ for supporting a means of resolving disputes about high hedges. The findings of this work will be reported to Parliament early in 2009, alongside the findings of the review of national antisocial behaviour policy.
- Asked by: David McLetchie, MSP for Edinburgh Pentlands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 25 August 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Linda Fabiani on 12 September 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W-14928 by Linda Fabiani on 7 August 2008, when it intends to publish a further report on the Fresh Talent: Working in Scotland scheme and whether the report will (a) assess the extent to which the recent growth in the population of Scotland is directly attributable to the measures in the scheme and (b) compare this growth with population growth in other parts of the United Kingdom to which these measures did not apply.
Answer
The Fresh Talent: Working in Scotland Scheme: Evidence Review report is now available on the Scottish Government website at
www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/Recent. A copy of the report will also be placed in the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (Bib. number 46484).
- Asked by: David McLetchie, MSP for Edinburgh Pentlands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 11 August 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 8 September 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it believes that reductions in class sizes to a maximum of 18 in P1 to P3 can be achieved without the introduction of legislation.
Answer
Progress is being made to reduce class sizes to 18 in P1 to P3 without legislation. We signed a concordat with the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities last year under which local government undertook to reduce primary 1 to primary 3 classes to a maximum of 18 as quickly as possible. Local government also agreed to make year on year progress towards the delivery of the class size reduction policy. We have always acknowledged that progress on class size reduction would vary across local authorities depending on local circumstances and needs. We will continue to monitor the situation as to whether legislation would be required to cover this and the last administration''s policies.
- Asked by: David McLetchie, MSP for Edinburgh Pentlands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 11 August 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maureen Watt on 5 September 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it intends to amend its guidance on local authority proposals for the school estate to include reference to the commitment in its concordat with local government to reduce class sizes in P1 to P3 to a maximum of 18 as a factor to be taken into account in framing such proposals.
Answer
No. We re-issued Additional Guidance on Local Authority Proposals for the School Estate, including School Closures on 11 October 2007. A copy is available in the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (Bib. number 43920). The primary purpose of the guidance is to set out the roles and responsibilities of those involved in considering proposals that may lead to changes in the school estate including the closure of schools. The guidance already makes clear our expectation that, in formulating such proposals, authorities should indeed take account of all factors, in each case.