- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 10 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 11 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-19777 by Nicol Stephen on 5 December 2001, what the reasons were for the closure of the four primary schools in the Stirling area.
Answer
The decisions to close the schools concerned were the responsibility of Stirling Council. The Scottish Executive had no role in that process and does not hold information on the reasons for the closures.
- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 13 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 11 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-19962 by Allan Wilson on 11 December 2001, what bids for funding have been made for 2002-03 from organisations or communities in (a) Fife, (b) Perth and Kinross and (c) Angus under each of the three elements of the Scottish Rural Partnership Fund.
Answer
| RCF | RSSF | LCGS |
Fife | 1 bid | 0 bids | 0 bids |
Angus | 6 bids | 1 bid | 4 bids |
Perth & Kinross | 5 bids | 1 bid | 4 bids |
All bids received are currently being assessed and an announcement will be made early this year.
- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 14 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 11 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what initiatives that encourage people to stand for election to school boards it has supported in each of the last five years.
Answer
In 1997, 1999 and 2001 we produced and distributed some 700,000 election publicity leaflets to local authorities for circulation to parents of school pupils in Scotland in order to promote parental involvement in school board elections. These distributions coincided with elections for vacancies for parent members on school boards. In 2001 we produced a poster to accompany the leaflets. In 2000 the School Boards (Scotland) Act 1988 was amended to allow for a simpler election process to encourage more people to stand for election.
- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 13 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Peter Peacock on 10 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether local authority by-elections can be held within the six-month period leading up to the scheduled local government elections in May 2002, and what implications there may be for the timing of local authority by-elections over the next two years should the Scottish Local Government (Elections) Bill be enacted.
Answer
The general rule is that local authority by-elections cannot be held within the six-month period leading up to scheduled local government elections. This is in accordance with the current law as provided in section 37 of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973. In terms of section 37(2), where a vacancy in the office of councillor occurs within six months before the date of the next local government elections, a by-election should not be held but instead the vacancy should be filled at the next elections. This rule is subject to an exception if the total number of vacancies exceeds a third of the number of members. Therefore (subject to this exception) local authority by-elections cannot be held in the six-month period leading up to the local government elections currently scheduled for May 2002. On the enactment of the provisions of the Scottish Local Government (Elections) Bill, the local government elections scheduled for May 2002 will not take place. Section 2A(1) of the bill makes provision for any vacancies which would otherwise have been filled at the May 2002 elections by providing that an election to fill such a vacancy must be held within three months of the date on which the bill's provisions come in to force.As regards vacancies occurring after the date on which the act comes in to force, these will be filled in accordance with section 37 of the 1973 Act as amended by the bill. This means that a by election must be held within three months of the vacancy occurring unless it occurs within six months of the date of the next local government elections in which case the vacancy can be filled at those elections.
- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 14 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 10 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how much (a) financial and (b) non-financial support it has provided in each of the last five years for the training of members of school boards.
Answer
The Scottish Executive does not provide direct financial support for the training of school board members. Such training is generally supported from school board budgets provided by education authorities, or direct from education authorities' own budgets. The Scottish Executive has, however, provided funding to the Scottish School Board Association (SSBA) to develop training courses for school board members as follows:
2001 | - |
2000 | £17,925 |
1999 | £3,108 |
1998 | £5,772 |
1997 | £7,336 |
The Scottish Executive has also provided the following non-financial support in each of the last five years for the training of school board members:Regular telephone advice to school board members and others on school boards legislation. Guidance on various aspects of school board legislation and operation in the form of 16 Focus Papers, which are available from the Parent Zone website (www.ngflscotland.gov.uk/parentzone) or from the Scottish Executive free of charge. Advice and editorial assistance on the development of the training course materials funded by the Scottish Executive.
- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Patricia Ferguson on 7 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-14451 by Mr Tom McCabe on 6 April 2001, on how many occasions since then it has asked MSPs to lodge parliamentary questions in order to enable it to make an announcement and whether it will provide a list of such questions, giving the date on which they were lodged and the names of the MSPs who lodged them.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-20923.
- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 13 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Elaine Murray on 27 December 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-20472 by Dr Elaine Murray on 11 December 2001, how much the severance payment made to Tessa Jackson following her departure as Director of the Scottish Arts Council was and whether ministerial approval was sought for the sum involved.
Answer
I have nothing further to add to my reply to question S1W-20472 on 11 December 2001 on this subject.
- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 13 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 27 December 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-7052 by Sarah Boyack on 19 June 2000, what the (a) net revenue expenditure on roads maintenance and (b) gross capital expenditure on the structural maintenance of roads has been in respect of each local authority in 2001-02.
Answer
The following table shows provisional figures provided by each local authority for the net revenue expenditure on roads and winter maintenance. However, although the Executive collects forecasts of capital expenditure on the structural maintenance of roads in the current year, we cannot at present provide this information in the detail requested.Roads & Road Lighting Budget Estimate 2001-02
| Road Maintenance (£0) | Winter Maintenance (£0) |
Aberdeen, City | 3,105 | 1,561 |
Aberdeenshire | 7,114 | 3,835 |
Angus | 2,528 | 1,280 |
Argyll and Bute | 6,615 | 1,698 |
Clackmannanshire | 678 | 375 |
Dumfries and Galloway | 6,170 | 1,033 |
Dundee | 2,425 | 673 |
East Ayrshire | 2,828 | 1,089 |
East Dunbartonshire | 2,625 | 698 |
East Lothian | 1,832 | 720 |
East Renfrewshire | 1,886 | 450 |
Edinburgh, City | 9,623 | 872 |
Eilean Siar | 3,225 | 1,263 |
Falkirk | 1,601 | 1,141 |
Fife | 5,795 | 2,487 |
Glasgow | 11,598 | 1,723 |
Highland | 5,998 | 6,838 |
Inverclyde | 1,504 | 238 |
Midlothian | 2,130 | 635 |
Moray | £1,926 | £1,350 |
North Ayrshire | 2,485 | 430 |
North Lanarkshire | 6,203 | 1,832 |
Orkney | 3,105 | 718 |
Perth and Kinross | 4,259 | 1,960 |
Renfrewshire | 6,239 | 729 |
Scottish Borders | 6,070 | 1,465 |
Shetland | 4,446 | 1,007 |
South Ayrshire | 3,831 | 660 |
South Lanarkshire | 11,795 | 2,622 |
Stirling | 2,433 | 1,243 |
West Dunbartonshire | 2,481 | 574 |
West Lothian | 4,017 | 1,687 |
Scotland | 138,570 | 44,886 |
Note: The figures in this table are taken from local authorities' annual Provisional Outturn & Budget Estimate Return to the Scottish Executive.Figures do not include Capital From Current Revenue or any loan/leasing charges.
- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 12 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 26 December 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-19962 by Allan Wilson on 11 December 2001, how much has been awarded to organisations in (a) Stirling district and (b) Clackmannanshire in each of the past five years under each of the three elements that make up the Scottish Rural Partnership Fund and how much was applied for in each case.
Answer
Prior to the 2000-01 round, applicants to the Scottish Rural Partnership Fund (SRPF) were not required to provide details of their local authority area to the department. This detail, coupled with the fact that electronic recording of application data was not undertaken, means that the information requested could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. However, it is possible to give an answer that refers to the successful bids submitted by Stirling and Clackmannanshire districts for the 2000-01 and 2001-02 rounds.(a) Stirling District
| 2000-01 funding round | 2001-02 funding round |
Amount Applied for (£) | £68,750 | £0 |
Amount Applied for (£) | £0 | £0 |
Amount Applied for (£) | £28,000 | £16,750 |
(b) Clackmannanshire
| 2000-01 funding round | 2001-02 funding round |
Amount Applied for (£) | £0 | £0 |
Amount Applied for (£) | £0 | £0 |
Amount Applied for (£) | £0 | £100,000 |
- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 12 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 26 December 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to its news release SE5013/2001 on 11 December 2001, what financial impact the changes will have on the non-domestic rates burden of (a) Central Scotland Police, (b) NHS Forth Valley, (c) Stirling Council and (d) Clackmannanshire Council.
Answer
The poundage supplement for ratepayers occupying property with a rateable value in excess of £25,000 will be fixed when the poundage figure is set for 2003-04. A provisional poundage figure for 2003-04 is likely to be announced in December 2003 and confirmed the following February.