- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jack McConnell on 21 March 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive to list the costs associated with the running of the office of the First Minister itemised by cost item and with staff costs split into civil service staff and Special Advisers.
Answer
We initially sent out over 1,500 documents to a range of private and public individuals and organisations including all MSPs, Council leaders, Chief Executives, secondary schools and libraries. We subsequently received requests for additional copies and the final number of consultation papers sent out is 1,830. While the formal response to the document has been low, I am encouraged by the interest there has been in the document. As the Parliament only took up its powers on 1 July, timescales for consultation were limited this year and this will have affected the level of response. I will consider the timing and presentation of the exercise when we consult again next year.I will place copies of the responses to the consultation paper in SPICe.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 07 February 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Susan Deacon on 29 February 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what Scottish per capita spending on health is in the current financial year; what the proportionate per capita difference is in spending compared to the UK average, and whether this proportionate per capita differential will be maintained or will reduce.
Answer
The planned net Scottish per capita spending on health for the current year is £964. The planned per capita expenditure for Scotland is about 18% higher than the UK average. Planned per capita expenditure for 2000-01 and 2001-02 is about 18% and 17% higher respectively. Expenditure plans for 2002-03 and beyond will be considered during the forthcoming spending review. Under the Barnett Formula Scotland will receive the same per capita increase as comparable UK programmes.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 01 November 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 28 February 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what representations it has received on the issue of a possible "Pesticide Tax" and what assessment it has made of the implications of such a tax for the Scottish agricultural sector.
Answer
I have received representations from various sectors of the farming industry expressing concerns about a pesticides tax. These views have been made known in correspondence, and, more recently, at meetings I have had with arable farmers.I am concerned that any pesticides tax should not encourage farmers to use cheaper and less effective pesticides, possibly in greater quantities than those currently used. I am also concerned that such a change would adversely affect the quality of some crops. It will be important to ensure that any tax proposals which may emerge do not result in such perverse effects which would benefit neither farmers nor the environment.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 October 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jack McConnell on 25 February 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what the total actual, estimated and planned revenue and capital expenditure is for local authorities between 1997-98 and 2001-02 in 1998-99 prices, and what is the difference between this sum and expenditure if it were fro'en in real terms at the level of expenditure in 1996-97, in value and percentage terms.
Answer
The available information on local authority expenditure on General Fund, capital and housing revenue accounts for the years 1997-98 to 1999-2000 is given in the following tables. As local authorities only set their budgets annually it is not possible to give figures for 2000-01 and 2001-02. The figures in the tables have been expressed in 1998-99 prices using GDP Deflator data published by HM Treasury on 10 November 1999.
Summary of Actual and Estimated Expenditure by Local Authorities
Table 1: Local Authority Revenue Expenditure on General Fund
| Final Outturn 1997-98 £ million | Provisional Outturn 1998-99 £ million | Budget Estimate 1999-2000 £ million |
Real Terms (1998/99 Prices) (CFCR included within the above) | 6,72655 | 6,73059 | 6,83028 |
1996/97 Expenditure (1998/99 Prices)(CFCR included within the above) | 6,93271 | 6,93271 | 6,93271 |
Difference in Value | -206 | -202 | -102 |
Difference in % | -3.0 | -2.9 | -1.5 |
Notes:
1. The figures in the table are net expenditure as gross expenditure is not available on provisional outturn and budget estimate returns from local authorities.
2. Final Outturn data is as reported by authorities on their Local Financial Returns. For 1997-98 the source of loan charge data is the 1997-98 Provisional Outturn return from local authorities
.Provisional Outturn and Budget Estimate information is provided to the Scottish Executive annually by local authorities in their POBE returns.
4. The figures in the table are accounted for on accrual basis.
5. CFCR is capital from current revenue which is the revenue contribution to capital spending.
Table 2: Local Authority Capital Payments
| Final 1997-98 £ million | Provisional 1998-99 £ million | Estimate 1999-2000 £ million |
Real Terms (1998-99 Prices) (CFCR included within the above) | 988 153 | 1,027 205 | 1,090 198 |
1996-97 Expenditure (1998-99 Prices) (CFCR included within the above) | 1,063 126 | 1,063 126 | 1,063 126 |
Difference in Value | -75 | -36 | 27 |
Difference in % | -7.1 | -3.4 | 2.5 |
Notes:
1. The figures in the table are gross capital payments both funded and not funded from revenue and include expenditure on HRA Housing and New Housing Partnerships.
2. Information supplied by local authorities on the statistical returns: Capital payments and their financing (CPR 5), CPRFIN 2 Forecast and the Housing Statistics return HCM 2.
3. The figures in the table are accounted for on a cash basis.
4. The 1999-2000 figures exclude expenditure on Airports, Commercial Ports, Piers and Harbours, and Shetland work charges.
Table 3: Local Authority Housing Revenue Accounts
| Provisional 1997-98 £ million | Provisional 1998-99 £ million | Estimate 1999-2000 £ million |
Real Terms (1998-99 Prices) (CFCR included within the above) | 1,158 66 | 1,174 86 | 1,167 98 |
1996/97 Expenditure (1998-99 Prices) (CFCR included within the above) | 1,099 24 | 1,099 24 | 1,099 24 |
Difference in Value | 59 | 75 | 68 |
Difference in % | 5.3 | 6.8 | 6.2 |
Notes:
1. The figures in the table are gross expenditure.
2. The 1996-97 information is taken from authorities HSG1A return, the 1997-98 from the HSG1 and the 1999-2000 from the HRA estimate return.
3. Housing Revenue Account expenditure is almost entirely self-financed through rental income (including housing benefit).
It should be noted, however, that the figures in the tables are not directly comparable year on year, as the figures for earlier years are actual expenditure, whereas the figures for the later years are still estimates at this stage.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 27 October 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jack McConnell on 25 February 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what the total actual, estimated and planned capital expenditure is for local authorities between 1997-98 and 2001-02 in 1998-99 prices, and what the difference is between this sum and expenditure if it were fro'en in real terms at the level of expenditure in 1996-97.
Answer
I refer the Member to the answer given to question S1W-2201.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 07 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 23 February 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the land previously covered by the Ravenscraig Steelworks has been restored to habitable levels.
Answer
British Steel has carried out extensive work on this site, but even now this work is not yet completed and parts of the site are still to some extent contaminated, and may need further remediation. There are however other large parts of the site which were never used for the steel plant and are not contaminated, and in effect these are Greenfield sites.The extent of the contamination (and other infrastructure constraints) was a key consideration when Lanarkshire Development Agency drew up the Ravenscraig Masterplan. The consultants looked in detail at the ground conditions, the possible end uses, likely method of remediation required and likely cost. A fairly detailed matrix was produced along with a Remediation Strategy as part of the Master-planning process. The location of the various uses shown in the current Masterplan - urban village; business park; town centre; area for commercial development, and the residential neighbourhood - in effect represent the optimum locations for each type of development, taking into account cost and value along with design considerations.There is also a Secure Containment Facility, covering an area of 30 acres out of the total site area of 1,125 acres. This facility, which contains contaminated material removed from elsewhere on the site, is intended for landscaping purposes only.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 February 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jack McConnell on 17 February 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what amount of revenues, charges and receipts received and accruing to Scottish Executive departments and agencies have been passed to Her Majesty's Treasury since 1997-98 in total, actual and estimated, and in constant prices.
Answer
In 1997-98 the total estimate for receipts was £1,552 million. The actual amount received was £1,539 million. Of this £1,298 million was retained by departments.I refer the Member to the answer I gave to his earlier question (S1O-964) for the corresponding figures for 1998-99.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 27 October 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jack McConnell on 10 February 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what the total actual, estimated and planned capital expenditure is for transport and the environment between 1997-98 and 2001-02 in 1998-99 prices, and what the difference is between this sum and expenditure if it were fro'en in real terms at the level of expenditure in 1996-97.
Answer
Total capital expenditure from the assigned budget on transport and the environment (actual, estimated and planned) between 1997-98 and 2001-02 at 1998-99 prices is expected to be £1,592 million, as compared with a total £1,742 million if expenditure were frozen at 1996-97 levels and expressed in 1998-99 prices.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 27 October 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jack McConnell on 10 February 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what specific aspect of the rural affairs budget will be reduced in the current financial year to accommodate the published reduction in expenditure.
Answer
The rural affairs budget is not being reduced. As a result of my announcement on 6 October, spending this year on rural affairs will increase by £1.5 million to assist agri-environment schemes. There will be a further increase of £20 million later this year for Hill Livestock Compensatory Allowances, as part of the package of special measures for the farming sector announced in September.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 10 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 3 February 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what the number of police officers is covering each Parliamentary constituency.
Answer
The information is not available in the form requested.