- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 11 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 14 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-20401 by Lewis MacDonald on 10 December 2001, why it did not give its reasons for preventing Amey Highways Ltd and BEAR (Scotland) Ltd from responding directly to enquiries from the media as requested and when it will do so.
Answer
The reason for precluding the Operating Companies from responding directly to enquiries from the media was confirmed in my answer to question S1W-20401. This condition was included in the contract to clearly define areas of responsibility between the Scottish Executive and the Operating Companies in respect of dealings with the media. However, the Operating Companies are now permitted to respond directly to the media on factual or operational matters, as indicated in my answer to question S1W-19992. The Executive remains responsible for responding to the media on matters of policy or finance.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 03 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 14 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, with regard to paragraph 2.40 of Audit Scotland's The new trunk road contracts, whether any new working methods have been identified and proposed by (a) Amey Highways Ltd and (b) BEAR Scotland Ltd and what the timescale for implementation is in each case.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-20533 on 26 November 2001.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 12 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Patricia Ferguson on 14 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-20441 by Lewis MacDonald on 11 December 2001 and given that it is "not usual to provide details of discussions between Ministers and third parties", how many written parliamentary questions seeking answers relating to such discussions (a) have fallen into this category, (b) received answers to the information requested, (c) did not receive the information requested over the previous six month period, broken down by question number, subject of question and the Department providing the answers.
Answer
Information in the form requested could only be provided at disproportionate cost. However, the member will be aware that all written answers are published in the Written Answers Report available on the Parliament's website.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 29 November 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 14 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, with regard to paragraph 2.37 of Audit Scotland's The new trunk road contracts, what routine work has not been done to the level or standard required by (a) Amey Highways Ltd and (b) BEAR (Scotland) Ltd and what remedial action has been taken by (i) it and (ii) the contractor in respect of each such occurrence.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-20533 on 26 November 2001.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 November 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 11 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what the population of (a) cormorants, (b) goosanders and (c) red breasted mergansers was in each year since 1994, also expressed as a percentage of the 1994 figures.
Answer
This information is not held directly by the Executive. The following estimates and commentary have been supplied by Scottish Natural Heritage. Data are available separately for breeding pairs and for the peak wintering population. Breeding Population:Figures for the breeding population of goosander are available only for the year 1987, when the estimated population in Scotland was about 1,443 breeding pairs. In 1997, when the survey was repeated on a sample selection of the river lengths surveyed in 1987, no significant change in the breeding population was estimated to have taken place.Red breasted mergansers breed in coastal areas and no reliable estimate of the breeding population has ever been obtained.Breeding cormorants have only been censused fully in the years 1985-87 and more recently for Seabird 2000, although figures for this latter survey are not yet compiled. Overall trends for cormorant populations, where detailed surveys of individual colonies are undertaken, show that declines in population have occurred.Wintering Population:Counts for wintering populations are available from Wetland Bird Survey (WeBS) counts, though for all species these are not complete surveys, especially for red-breasted merganser and cormorant which are predominantly coastal dwelling birds. However, WeBS data showing peak counts for Scotland as a whole are provided for each species in the following tables. The proportional change from 1994 is also shown as well as the month in which the peak population was counted.The populations of red breasted merganser and goosander wintering in Scotland are thought to include birds from breeding grounds in Scandinavia and continental Europe. The proportion of birds from these areas has not been determined.Cormorant
Year | Peak count (during September to March period) | Percentage of 1994 figure | Month of peak count |
1994-95 | 3,001 | 100% | January |
1995-96 | 3,796 | 126% | November |
1996-97 | 2,873 | 96% | December |
1997-98 | 2,578 | 86% | October |
1998-99 | 2,147 | 72% | September |
1999-2000 | 2,826 | 94% | October |
Goosander
Year | Peak count (during September to March period) | Percentage of 1994 figure | Month of peak count |
1994-95 | 1,157 | 100% | February |
1995-96 | 1,473 | 127% | December |
1996-97 | 1,303 | 113% | January |
1997-98 | 1,220 | 105% | November |
1998-99 | 1,096 | 95% | December |
1999-2000 | 993 | 86% | January |
Red-breasted merganser
Year | Peak count (during September to March period) | Percentage of 1994 figure | Month of peak count |
1994-95 | 2,981 | 100% | December |
1995-96 | 1,813 | 61% | October |
1996-97 | 2,045 | 69% | October |
1997-98 | 1,520 | 51% | October |
1998-99 | 1,663 | 56% | December |
1999-2000 | 1,597 | 54% | February |
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 11 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 11 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive why it has not yet given a substantive answer to question S1W-19800, lodged on 7 November 2001, and when it will do so.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-19800 on 3 January 2001.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 06 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 11 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has been consulted on, or is aware of, any plans by the Strategic Rail Authority to locate any personnel in Scotland.
Answer
The effective management of the resources of the Strategic Rail Authority (SRA), including the deployment of its staff, is a matter for the SRA's Executive Board. The SRA have not informed the Executive of any plans to relocate staff to Scotland.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 11 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the Minister for Enterprise, Transport and Lifelong Learning stated at the announcement on 4 December 2001 of the Edinburgh Crossrail Project that Beauly Station had already opened and, if so, why, and when trains will be in a position to stop at the platform.
Answer
The Minister for Enterprise, Transport and Lifelong Learning referred on 4 December to the originally scheduled date for the re-opening of the Beauly Station, 30 November 2001. Cancellation of this schedule was notified to the Executive only on the date in question, and the minister was informed on 5 December.The re-opening of Beauly Station is a matter for Railtrack and Health and Safety Executive.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 28 November 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 11 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-19848 by Sarah Boyack on 23 November 2001, (a) on what dates since 1 March 2001 it has had meetings at which the subject of vertical integration of the rail network was discussed and (b) with which relevant bodies and individuals each such meeting was held, where and who instigated each such meeting.
Answer
There is nothing further to add. As the member will be aware, it is not usual to provide details of discussions between ministers and third parties.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 21 November 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 9 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether Amey Highways Ltd and BEAR (Scotland) Ltd have enough plant resource in place to meet the requirements of Section 5 of Schedule 7, Part 2 of the Term Contract for Management and Maintenance of the Scottish Trunk Road Network for each contract area, and, if not, how much plant resource to meet the requirements of Section 5 remains outstanding, broken down by contract area.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-20202 on 19 December 2001.