- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 August 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 9 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-27227 by Lewis Macdonald on 26 July 2002, what external bodies have been, or will be consulted, in its investigations into "whether there might be other ways to provide compensation for the loss of future pension rights for the transferred staff affected"; on what date this process was started, and when it is envisaged that the investigations might be completed.
Answer
The Scottish Executive has consulted with the EC and with the maintenance contractors. The process was started in April 2001. The answer given to question S1W-27277 indicated it was a complex area and therefore I am not able to give an indication of when investigations might be completed.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 August 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Iain Gray on 6 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it intends making changes to the current structure of the modern apprenticeship programme and, if so, (a) what any such changes will be and (b) when they will take place, detailing the reasons behind its position on this matter.
Answer
Modern apprenticeship (MA) frameworks are designed by business sectors through the network of Sector Skills Councils. The Executive has recently agreed with the major stakeholders involved in MAs that minimum levels of core skills should be included in MA frameworks. No other changes are planned.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 August 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Iain Gray on 6 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how many and what percentage of young people left the modern apprenticeship programme without achieving any qualifications in each year since 1999, broken down by framework.
Answer
The information requested is not recorded. It is possible for any modern apprentice to achieve some qualifications or elements of qualifications before leaving the programme.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 August 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Iain Gray on 6 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how many and what percentage of people who left the modern apprenticeship programme have entered sustained employment in each year since 1999, broken down by framework.
Answer
The information requested is not routinely recorded. The Executive's recent Review of Modern Apprenticeships in Scotland (published in January 2002) indicated that of those surveyed, 85% of those completing their modern apprenticeship were still with the same employer two years after graduation, and 70% of modern apprentices in training intended to remain with their current employer.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 August 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 6 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-27227 by Lewis Macdonald on 26 July 2002, whether it had any power to insist on the provision of better pensions in the trunk roads maintenance contracts and, if so, under what section of (a) the Scotland Act or (b) any other legislation any such powers were conveyed.
Answer
There were no legislative powers to allow the Scottish Executive to insist on the provision of better pension rights on the trunk road maintenance contracts.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 01 August 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Iain Gray on 29 August 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-27236 by Iain Gray on 29 July 2002, whether the acceptance criteria for student loan applications and subsequent validation process should have prevented any students that progressed from a higher education course at college to a higher level course at university in any form of default from being permitted to access further monies.
Answer
If a student loan applicant is recorded on the Student Loans Company system as holding an existing account which is in arrears or default, the system should automatically withhold payment of further support until the existing default debt is settled.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 01 August 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Iain Gray on 29 August 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-27236 by Iain Gray on 29 July 2002, why all accounts of students that progress from higher education courses at college to higher level courses at university cannot be merged successfully and, in particular, (a) what the difficulties are in matching and merging personal data, (b) for how long this situation has existed and (c) what action it has taken in respect of this matter.
Answer
Difficulties in matching accounts usually occur because of discrepancies in the information provided on the original and the most recent loan application form which would otherwise have enabled the applications to be matched to the same borrower. This can be a difference in the format of a borrower's name or contact details, or the omission of the declaration that a student loan has been taken out before. The automatic system checks which prevent these accounts being merged are in place for the security of applicants to ensure that new loan applications are not attributed to other borrowers' accounts. This situation has existed since the introduction of the student loans scheme. It is, however, highly unlikely to occur with the current system of income contingent repayment student loans where repayments are collected directly by Inland Revenue. The Student Loans Company has a dedicated team which deals with "stand alone" accounts and is working to enhance its computer system to improve automatic matching.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 01 August 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Iain Gray on 29 August 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-27236 by Iain Gray on 29 July 2002, why former students that incurred default notice debts as a result of the Student Loans Company (SLC) computer system being unable to rationalise, match and merge personal data are informed on enquiry that there is no appeals process in respect of such default notices and penalties and what action it plans to take in respect of this matter.
Answer
Former students who incur default notice debts as a result of SLC system failing to match data should not be advised that there is no appeals process in respect of such default. The Student Loans Company has an objective and thorough formal complaints procedure which provides for investigation of situations such as this. Where complainants are not satisfied with the outcome of the investigation they can ask for their complaint to be reviewed by a senior manager, the Chief Executive and, ultimately, an impartial independent assessor.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 01 August 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Iain Gray on 29 August 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-27236 by Iain Gray on 29 July 2002, whether any former students that incurred default notice debts as a result of the Student Loans Company (SLC) computer system being unable to rationalise, match and merge personal data should be required to pay financial penalties as a result of this situation and what the reasons are for its position on this matter.
Answer
No student should be required to pay a financial penalty as a result of the SLC system failing to match data. Where a default notice has been issued to a borrower who holds an unmatched or "stand alone" account which is up to date with repayments or in deferment, SLC should reverse the default notice and bring the account into line with its partner.
- Asked by: Andrew Wilson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 24 July 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Patricia Ferguson on 21 August 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive by what process it decides which minister answers a written parliamentary question.
Answer
In general, written parliamentary questions are answered by the minister with the relevant portfolio interest.