Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Questions and answers

Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for MSPs to get factual and statistical information.

  • Written questions must be answered within 10 working days (20 working days during recess)
  • Other questions such as Topical, Portfolio, General and First Minister's Question Times are taken in the Chamber

Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search.  There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.

Find out more about parliamentary questions

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 9 September 2025
Answer status
Question type

Displaying 3059 questions Show Answers

|

Question reference: S2W-21857

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tavish Scott on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-21283 by Tavish Scott on 15 December 2005, whether it considers that an on-line upgrade of the A80 to full motorway status provides more room for the construction of a hard shoulder than would be provided by routing the M80 through the identified Kelvin Valley Route.

Question reference: S2W-21838

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tom McCabe on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive whether SQW Economic Development Consultants offset the cost of negative coverage of Scotland against their estimate of the cost of positive coverage of Scotland in relation to Gleneagles hosting the 2005 G8 Summit, which they translated into an advertising equivalent value of £66.4 million between 2 and 11 July 2005 and £618 million in the wider six-month period in the lead up to the summit, as set out in their report, Economic Impact of Hosting the 2005 G8 Summit at Gleneagles.

Question reference: S2W-21829

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tom McCabe on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive what the cost to it was of commissioning SQW Economic Development Consultants to investigate the economic impact of hosting the 2005 G8 summit at Gleneagles.

Question reference: S2W-21830

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tom McCabe on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive what the detailed methodology used by SQW Economic Development Consultants was in their investigation of the economic impact of hosting the 2005 G8 summit at Gleneagles by which they measured the advertising value equivalent of the “unprecedented media coverage” of Scotland between 2 and 11 July 2005 as a result of the G8 summit as being worth £66.4 million.

Question reference: S2W-21833

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tom McCabe on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive whether the terms of reference for the report prepared for it by SQW Economic Development Consultants into the economic impact of hosting the 2005 G8 summit at Gleneagles included a requirement to analyse the cost to businesses of repairing the damage to private property as a result of protests at the presence of the summit.

Question reference: S2W-21837

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tom McCabe on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how SQW Economic Development Consultants measured coverage of Scotland as a result of the 2005 G8 summit being held in Gleneagles as being either neutral, positive or negative in tone, as set out in the report, Economic Impact of Hosting the 2005 G8 Summit at Gleneagles.

Question reference: S2W-21843

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tom McCabe on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive what the effect would be of the 2005 G8 Summit being held in Gleneagles in terms of the expenditure accrued by it, as opposed to the revenue accrued to the Scottish economy by the summit, if the revenue raised by the Make Poverty History march and Live 8 event were not included in the estimate made by SQW Economic Development Consultants in their report, Economic Impact of Hosting the 2005 G8 Summit at Gleneagles.

Question reference: S2W-21854

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tavish Scott on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-21289 by Tavish Scott on 15 December 2005, whether it will provide details of the integral demand management measures that might be deployed on the route of the M80 on-line upgrade.

Question reference: S2W-21845

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tom McCabe on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how SQW Economic Development Consultants estimated that 37% of those taking part in the Make Poverty History march and 39% of those attending the Live 8 event were from outside Scotland, as set out in their report, Economic Impact of Hosting the 2005 G8 Summit at Gleneagles.

Question reference: S2W-21753

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive what its opinion is of the claims by Swiss Senator, Dick Marty, in his report presented to the Legal Affairs and Human Rights Committee of the Council of Europe, that the allegations that the CIA has abducted and illegally transported terror suspects across European borders are credible in relation to the allegations that US agencies have used Scottish airports as refuelling stops for flights in which it is alleged that suspected terrorists are being carried to countries where the practice of torture is used for the purposes of interrogation.