Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Questions and answers

Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for MSPs to get factual and statistical information.

  • Written questions must be answered within 10 working days (20 working days during recess)
  • Other questions such as Topical, Portfolio, General and First Minister's Question Times are taken in the Chamber

Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search.  There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.

Find out more about parliamentary questions

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 8 September 2025
Answer status
Question type

Displaying 3059 questions Show Answers

|

Question reference: S2W-22279

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how it will improve conditions in Dunedin Hall at HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont which were described as “basic” by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons in paragraph 11.4 of his inspection report of March 2005.

Question reference: S2W-22288

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive what action it has taken to comply with the recommendation of HM Chief Inspector of Prisons in paragraph 5.32 of his inspection report of May 2004 that HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont “needs to provide training for staff specific to the needs of working with their unique population” but identified as being only “partly achieved” in paragraph 12.28 of his March 2005 report.

Question reference: S2W-22280

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how it will improve the situation in Dunedin Hall at HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont which was identified by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons in paragraph 11.4 of his inspection report of March 2005 as having seen “little improvement in what is a very limited regime”.

Question reference: S2W-22273

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive whether it can confirm that the initiative of increasing portions of food available at HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont was abandoned because it “caused such an increase in cost”, as stated by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons in paragraph 2.4 of his inspection report of March 2005.

Question reference: S2W-22272

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive what plans it has to end the practice of slopping out for remand prisoners at HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont, given the view expressed by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons in the preamble to his inspection report of March 2005, that “it is very upsetting that the only remand prisoners who are regularly slopping out are under 21 years of age”.

Question reference: S2W-22287

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive why the reasons for not allowing individuals in Iona Hall at HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont have not been examined, as recommended by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons in paragraph 2.35 of his May 2004 inspection report but identified in paragraph 12.12 of his March 2005 report as “not achieved”.

Question reference: S2W-22289

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how it will address the situation in HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont, identified by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons in paragraph 12.38 of his inspection report of March 2005, that accommodation used for educational programmes “is still insufficient”.

Question reference: S2W-22284

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive what action it has taken in respect of HM Chief Inspector of Prisons’ recommendation in paragraph 11.10 of his inspection report of March 2005 into HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont that “the system needs to be reviewed to ensure that young adults do attend” their health centre, dental, psychology and social work appointments and “that there are adequate interview rooms available”.

Question reference: S2W-22274

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how it will ensure that children under the age of 16 are not held in prison, as recommended by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons in paragraph 8.45 of his inspection report of May 2004 on HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont.

Question reference: S2W-22277

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how it will improve arrangements for access to sanitation and hygiene in Argyll Hall at HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont, given HM Chief Inspector of Prisons’ assessment in paragraph 11.2 of his inspection report of March 2005 that his earlier recommendation for improvement, detailed in paragraph 2.4 of his report of May 2004, has been only “partly achieved”.