Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Questions and answers

Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for MSPs to get factual and statistical information.

  • Written questions must be answered within 10 working days (20 working days during recess)
  • Other questions such as Topical, Portfolio, General and First Minister's Question Times are taken in the Chamber

Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search.  There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.

Find out more about parliamentary questions

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 21 June 2025
Answer status
Question type

Displaying 3059 questions Show Answers

|

Question reference: S2W-26733

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 09 June 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Robert Brown on 20 June 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-25794 by Robert Brown on 17 May 2006, whilst it is not aware of any targets for adoption set by local authorities, whether it has set any targets for adoption of children.

Question reference: S2W-26728

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 09 June 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Robert Brown on 20 June 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-26016 by Lewis Macdonald on 30 May 2006, what are listed as grounds for referral in section 52 of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995.

Question reference: S2W-26734

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 09 June 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Robert Brown on 20 June 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-26018 by Robert Brown on 30 May 2006, whether this answer indicates that social workers do not have to declare to their employers or the Scottish Social Services Council any additional work in which they may be engaged beyond their employment as a registered social worker.

Question reference: S2W-26731

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 09 June 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Robert Brown on 20 June 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-26016 by Lewis Macdonald on 30 May 2006, if Munchausen syndrome by proxy, or fabricating or inducing illness, are not grounds for referral to the Principal Reporter, how they are defined within existing legislation.

Question reference: S2W-26666

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 08 June 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Allan Wilson on 20 June 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-26487 by Allan Wilson on 8 June 2006, what the cost will be of the evaluation of the Skills for Business Network and how the evaluation will be funded.

Question reference: S2W-26667

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 08 June 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Allan Wilson on 20 June 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-26487 by Allan Wilson on 8 June 2006, who has been commissioned with undertaking the Evaluation of the Skills for Business Network and when the evaluation will be completed

Question reference: S2W-26730

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 09 June 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Robert Brown on 20 June 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-26016 by Lewis Macdonald on 30 May 2006, whether section 52 of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995 is the only legislation governing the grounds for referral to the Principal Reporter and, if not, what other legislation exists.

Question reference: S2W-26736

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 09 June 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Robert Brown on 20 June 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how many children in each local authority area have been taken into care in each year since 1995 and, of these, how many were diagnosed with an autistic spectrum disorder.

Question reference: S2W-26727

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 09 June 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Robert Brown on 20 June 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-26016 by Lewis Macdonald on 30 May 2006, whether this answer indicates that it and its agencies, such as the Scottish Children’s Reporter Administration, have no records or knowledge of children being taken into care as a result of a referral on the grounds of Munchausen syndrome by proxy in either or both parents.

Question reference: S2W-26462

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 01 June 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 19 June 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-24473 by Cathy Jamieson on 13 April 2006, how it reconciles the statement that no credible or reliable information exists regarding the facilitation of “extraordinary rendition” flights through Scottish airports by US agencies with its statement, in answer to question S2W-24475 by Cathy Jamieson on 13 April 2006, that it would not comment on the credibility of a report handed to it by Angus Robertson MP regarding the existence of such flights, on the grounds that “it is not for ministers to judge the credibility, or otherwise, of the information in the report”.