- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 03 March 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 13 March 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has had any further meetings with Angus Council to discuss the funding of the replacement for the Montrose Bridge over the River South Esk and, if so, what the outcomes of the meetings were.
Answer
I last met with Angus Council representatives in October 2002. Angus Council has received additional capital consent of £2.8 million in 2001-02 and £1.4 million this year towards the cost of replacing the Montrose Bridge.
- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 26 February 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 6 March 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what discussions it has had with the relevant local authorities and other interested parties about the Tay Estuary Rail Study.
Answer
The Scottish Executive meets representatives of local authorities in the Tayside area on a regular basis to discuss a range of issues, including the Tay Estuary Rail Study.
- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 23 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 7 February 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what the (a) projected and (b) actual spending on advertising has been by each of its departments in each year since 1999.
Answer
Advertising expenditure for the years in question have been paid for by departments out of their programme budgets. In some cases projections for expenditure are known from the start of the financial year, for example the flu campaign which cost £806,646 in the current year. In other cases the need for a campaign may not be identified or agreed until sometime into the financial year. In such cases the projected expenditure will be estimated at the start, and finalised at the end of the planning and development phase. Some campaigns can take a considerable time to develop - an example is the Race campaign which spanned two financial years before it was run in autumn 2002. Once expenditure has been agreed it is closely monitored to ensure costs remain within the budget set.From 2003-04 control of advertising expenditure will be centralised and departments will make an application, supported by a business case, for funds allocated from a central budget.The figures requested for actual spending on advertising by departments are as follows:
1999-2000 |
Campaign | Total Advertising Expenditure |
Development Department |
Road Safety | £868,800 |
Education Department |
Children's Hearings | £121,260 |
Teacher Recruitment | £96,422 |
Home and Health Department |
Tobacco Campaign | £10,404 |
NHS Fraud | £100,000 |
Electoral Registration | £25,786 |
Fire Prevention | £390,900 |
European Elections | £32,029 |
Census | £9,993 |
Childcare Helpline | £73,675 |
Domestic Abuse | £550,197 |
Environment and Rural Affairs Department |
Food Safety | £118,682 |
Environment | £11,667 |
Constitution Group |
Scotland's Parliament | £533,151 |
2000-01 |
Campaign | Total Advertising Expenditure |
Health Department |
Alcohol Abuse | £471,970 |
Flu/winter campaign | £1,058,365 |
Organ Retention | £55,696 |
Organ Donor Filler | £48,465 |
NHS Helpline | £137,528 |
NHS Fraud | £121,942 |
NHS Public Appointments | £36,549 |
Development Department |
Road Safety | £1,267,048 |
Justice Department |
Safer Scotland | £162,826 |
Fire Prevention | £174,022 |
Drug Enforcement Agency | £54,735 |
Domestic Abuse | £507,464 |
Crime Prevention | £11,750 |
Fostering | £32,443 |
Education Department |
Teacher Recruitment | £27,024 |
Children's Hearings | £122,993 |
Child Care | £132,530 |
Environment Department |
Environment | £501,364 |
Lead in Water | £76,977 |
Development Department |
Travel Awareness | £318,809 |
Rural Affairs Department |
Food Safety | £32,480 |
2001-02 |
Campaign | Total Advertising Expenditure |
Health Department |
Drugs | £1,967,133 |
Flu | £630,043 |
NHS Helpline | £112,462 |
NHS Fraud | £29,920 |
Prevention of Suicide | £79,384 |
Alcohol Abuse | £513,176 |
Healthy Eating | £51,122 |
National Care Standards | £7,340 |
Education Department |
Children's Hearings | £250,732 |
Teacher Recruitment | £322,799 |
Child Protection on the Internet | £186,303 |
Funding for Learners | £9,488 |
Digital Access | £33,882 |
Justice Department |
Fire Prevention | £334,708 |
Racism | £14,394 |
Domestic Abuse | £650,553 |
Development Department |
Road Safety | £1,537,994 |
Travel Awareness | £585,613 |
Environment Department |
Environment | £767,497 |
Litter | £118,934 |
FCSD |
Electoral Registration | £4,838 |
Performance Management Guide - Intranet | £8,706 |
Scotland Online21st Century Govt | £15,667 |
2002-date |
Campaign | Total Advertising Expenditure |
Health Department |
Alcohol Abuse | £683,311 |
Drugs Campaign | £995,077 |
Flu Campaign | £923,503 |
Free Personal Care | £252,725 |
NHS Helpline | £124,876 |
Organ Donor | £24,440 |
Organ Retention | £85,142 |
Prevention of Suicide | £92,238 |
Healthy Eating | £495,386 |
Justice Department |
Crime Braker | £23,093 |
Domestic Abuse | £601,602 |
Racism | £1,245,207 |
Safer Scotland | £165,060 |
Fire Prevention | £228,197 |
Education Department |
Digital Access | £149,966 |
Children's Hearings | £537,986 |
Funding for Learners | £100,218 |
National Debate | £373,127 |
Teaching | £9,888 |
Home Reading | £14,554 |
Social Care | £525,588 |
UEFA | £7,030 |
Child Protection on the Internet | £102,641 |
Development Department |
Concessionary Fares | £393,343 |
Travel Awareness | £555,150 |
Road Safety | £1,296,734 |
Glasgow Housing Association | £31,450 |
M74 Completion | £18,792 |
Environment Department |
Environment | £561,385 |
| |
Enterprise and Lifelong Learning Department |
Regional Selective Assistance | £29,043 |
Finance and Central Services Department |
Tartan Day | £37,554 |
- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 January 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 6 February 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what its position is on any reduction or abolition of freight facilities grants and whether it will make representations to Her Majesty's Government on this matter.
Answer
The freight facilities and track access grant schemes, as administered by the Scottish Executive, will continue to be available in Scotland. We are in regular contact with the Strategic Rail Authority and with the Department for Transport about these schemes.
- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 15 January 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 23 January 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what progress has been made in assessing the economic impact that reductions in fishing quotas will have on fishing communities such as Arbroath.
Answer
Work has been commissioned by the North East of Scotland Fisheries Development Partnership to look at the likely economic impact of the decisions arising from the December Council. The Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department and Sea Fish Industry Authority economists have also contributed to a socio-economic analysis and this will inform the decisions that ministers have to take over the next few days.
- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 09 January 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 20 January 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive why organic egg production is not currently eligible for Farm Business Development Scheme funding given that such funding has previously been available for this type of production.
Answer
The purpose of the Farm Business Development Scheme (FBDS) is to provide financial support to farming families to create new income generating opportunities, or to expand or improve existing diversified activities, either within or outwith agriculture. As part of this, the FBDS can support diversification into "alternative agricultural production". The FBDS does not support mainstream investments in non-diversified agricultural activities.Organic egg production is not considered to be diversification into "alternative agricultural production". Eligible projects under this measure are required to be novel or aimed towards a niche markets e.g. worm farming, or an alpaca enterprise. Guidance on the approval of FBDS applications was clarified recently to ensure equity between the treatment of organic and non-organic projects, and this revised guidance is clear that organic egg production is not an eligible measure. Conversion of agricultural land to organic status is supported by the Executive's Organic Aid Scheme.
- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 3 January 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has any plans to meet Angus Council to discuss further the funding of the A92 bridge over the River South Esk at Montrose.
Answer
I met Angus Council in October to discuss the funding of the Montrose Bridge replacement project. Following that meeting we agreed to increase total Scottish Executive support for the project to £4.2 million. We have no immediate plans to meet Angus Council again in the near future to discuss this issue.
- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 03 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 17 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how it plans to improve co-ordination between local authorities, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency and other relevant bodies involved in tackling flooding and flood prevention.
Answer
Co-ordination between local authorities and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) is already an important part of the working arrangements in place for tackling flooding and flood risk. This will be further enhanced as a result of the amendment which the Executive introduced to the Water Environment and Water Services Bill and which was supported by all members of the committee without exception. This places a general obligation to promote sustainable flood management on ministers, SEPA and every responsible authority designated under the bill. Local authorities will be designated as responsible authorities. This represents a significant step forward but is only one part of the action we are taking in the Executive to deal with the flooding issue. An Ad Hoc Committee of Ministers is currently considering the arrangements for addressing flood risk more generally, and will provide advice to the Cabinet by the end of February 2003 on how these arrangements can be improved.
- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 03 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Des McNulty on 17 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what national planning guidelines there are on the location and development of wind farms.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1F-2168 on 10 October 2002, which is available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/search.htm.
- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Iain Gray on 12 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what powers it has to increase the number of stops made by ScotRail services on the east coast mainline.
Answer
Proposals to run new services, including ScotRail services on the East Coast Main Line, are matters for the local transport authority or transport partnership to take forward. The Scottish Executive's powers to issue directions and guidance to the Strategic Rail Authority are set out in section 208 of the Transport Act 2000.