- Asked by: Adam Ingram, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 20 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 1 October 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether there is any link between the number of females aged between 25 and 44 diagnosed with depression and the incidence of post-natal depression and whether it has directly funded, or is aware of, any research project into this issue.
Answer
The 2002 review of latest evidence by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network determined that 10 to 15% of women in Scotland who give birth can suffer from post-natal depression. Depression as a separate condition can affect a large proportion of women of childbearing age, though studies are evenly divided in reporting one condition more or less severe than the other. There is, however, some evidence that there is an increased risk of depression occurring in the early postnatal period. The care objective is to apply proper screening and follow up that identifies and responds to all assessed needs in each case.The Scottish Executive has not funded any research on the incidence of post-natal depression. Details of recent and current research on post-natal depression can be found in the National Research Register, which is available in the Parliament's Reference Centre (Bib. number 17404).
- Asked by: Adam Ingram, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 20 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 1 October 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive why it did not award core funding to Facilitate (Scotland).
Answer
Core funding can be awarded under section 16b of the National Health Service (Scotland) Act 1978 and section 10 of the Social Work (Scotland) Act 1968. Facilitate (Scotland) have been given feedback as to why their applications under these two schemes have been unsuccessful.
- Asked by: Adam Ingram, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 20 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 1 October 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what data is available to determine the causes of depression, broken down by (a) age and (b) gender.
Answer
Accurate data on the cause of depression in each case is not collected routinely.Addressing cause is important and our National Programme for the Improvement of Mental Health and Well-being and the available treatment services are designed to help prevent as well as treat the condition.
- Asked by: Adam Ingram, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 20 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 30 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what specific initiatives it will put in place apart from the National Framework for the Prevention of Suicide and Deliberate Self Harm to address any increase in the number of child and adolescent suicides.
Answer
The work of the National Programme for Improving the Mental Health and Wellbeing of the Scottish Population, established in October 2001 and overseen by a National Advisory Group which I chair, will bear on children and young people. It will also link into the range of policies and initiatives in train across the Executive to help give children a better start in life and to cope better with the difficulties which might otherwise lead them to consider self-harm or suicide.
- Asked by: Adam Ingram, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 20 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 30 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether there are any plans to compile an information pack for schools and pupils on child and adolescent suicide.
Answer
The Scottish Executive has no such plans.
- Asked by: Adam Ingram, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 29 August 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 27 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how many patients have been detained under section 18 of the Mental Health (Scotland) Act 1984 in each year since 1990, broken down by NHS board area.
Answer
This information is not held centrally. The following figures have been produced from data provided by the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland. They indicate the number of admissions to hospital under section 18 in each year and do not necessarily reflect the total number of patients being treated under section 18 in any one year.
| Year |
Board | 1990-91 | 1991-92 | 1992-93 | 1993-94 | 1994-95 | 1995-96 |
Argyll and Clyde NHS Unified Board | 61 | 73 | 63 | 87 | 97 | 110 |
Ayrshire and Arran Unified Board | 22 | 33 | 34 | 42 | 42 | 42 |
Borders Unified Board | 9 | 10 | * | 16 | 17 | 15 |
Fife NHS Board | 18 | 35 | 49 | 49 | 45 | 58 |
Forth Valley NHS Board | 20 | 21 | 19 | 30 | 31 | 33 |
Grampian NHS Board | 61 | 57 | 72 | 80 | 81 | 87 |
Greater Glasgow NHS Board | 115 | 151 | 126 | 158 | 161 | 163 |
Highland NHS Board | 29 | 40 | 41 | 46 | 32 | 32 |
Lothian NHS Unified Board | 78 | 104 | 118 | 131 | 130 | 160 |
NHS Dumfries and Galloway | 31 | 26 | 28 | 31 | 32 | 28 |
NHS Lanarkshire Board | 30 | 35 | 43 | 61 | 67 | 58 |
NHS Tayside Unified Board | 61 | 68 | 84 | 59 | 97 | 94 |
Other | 10 | 6 | * | 15 | 8 | 6 |
Total | 545 | 659 | 693 | 805 | 840 | 886 |
| Year |
Board | 1996-97 | 1997-98 | 1998-99 | 1999-2000 | 2000-01 | 2001-02 |
Argyll and Clyde NHS Unified Board | 112 | 113 | 116 | 82 | 108 | 88 |
Ayrshire and Arran Unified Board | 41 | 57 | 59 | 71 | 86 | 75 |
Borders Unified Board | 22 | 19 | * | * | 26 | * |
Fife NHS Board | 75 | 72 | 89 | 68 | 53 | 87 |
Forth Valley NHS Board | 31 | 32 | 36 | 32 | 41 | 42 |
Grampian NHS Board | 76 | 95 | 86 | 89 | 108 | 97 |
Greater Glasgow NHS Board | 170 | 164 | 186 | 185 | 204 | 222 |
Highland NHS Board | 48 | 55 | 45 | 52 | 43 | 45 |
Lothian NHS Unified Board | 156 | 158 | 180 | 186 | 191 | 201 |
NHS Dumfries and Galloway | 25 | 41 | 41 | 31 | 40 | 40 |
NHS Lanarkshire Board | 48 | 64 | 65 | 62 | 71 | 86 |
NHS Tayside Unified Board | 78 | 93 | 118 | 116 | 100 | 113 |
Other | 9 | 7 | * | * | 6 | * |
Total | 891 | 970 | 1049 | 1005 | 1077 | 1132 |
Figures marked * are not available to prevent disclosure of personal information.Years are from 1 April to 31 March.Other includes section 18 detentions in the State Hospital, Shetland NHS Board and unspecified cases.A very small proportion of patients may have had more than one episode of detention in each year.These figures have been derived from the Mental Welfare Commission's patient record's system. Statistics for years up until 1996 derive from older patient information systems where data have been transferred. In addition, there may be slight variations between these figures and those previously published by the commission as they have been derived from an active system.
- Asked by: Adam Ingram, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 13 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 26 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how all Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network guidelines are monitored to assess their impact and whether their implementation has been successful.
Answer
In 2001, a survey of progress by NHSScotland in implementing Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guidelines was carried out by a sub-group of the Clinical Resource and Audit Group (CRAG) and a summary report was published in July 2002. A copy of the report can be found on the CRAG website at:
http://www.show.scot.nhs.uk/crag/. This survey demonstrated that the implementation of SIGN guidelines is widespread throughout NHSScotland. Targeted dissemination of guidelines routinely occurs in almost all trusts, and most trusts have an explicit strategy for implementing guidelines following dissemination. As recommended in previous studies on methods of implementing evidence-based medicine, a combination of approaches (appropriate to local circumstances) has been used in the service. However, the survey also demonstrated that the implementation of individual guidelines was highly variable. A number of success factors and barriers to implementation were identified, many of which were applicable to a number of trusts. Although the implementation of SIGN guidelines will continue to be the responsibility of trusts, the introduction of unified NHS boards and Board Clinical Governance committees provides an opportunity to facilitate successful implementation, and to overcome barriers.In addition, assessment visits carried out by the Clinical Standards Board for Scotland monitor compliance with condition-specific and clinical governance ("generic") standards. These assessments will ensure that procedures are in place to implement SIGN and other relevant evidence-based guidance.
- Asked by: Adam Ingram, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 13 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 26 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-28420 by Malcolm Chisholm on 11 September 2002, how much funding has been allocated to mental health research in 2000-01, 2001-02 and 2002-03 to date.
Answer
The Chief Scientist Office (CSO), within the Scottish Executive Health Department, has responsibility for encouraging and supporting research into health services and patient care within the NHS in Scotland.The following table provides details of the amount CSO has spent both directly on mental health research projects and on other projects supported indirectly in the NHS through the Research and Development (R&D) Support Fund:
| 2000-01Actual Expenditure | 2001-02Actual Expenditure | 2002-03Anticipated Expenditure |
Direct Research Support | £1,043,853 | £913,389 | £975,600 |
R&D Support Fund | £2,729,260 | £2,831,327 | Information not yet available |
Details on individual projects are available from the National Research Register a copy of which is in the Parliament's Reference Centre (Bib. number 17404).
- Asked by: Adam Ingram, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 29 August 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 25 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether there has been any increase since 1990 in the number of patients diagnosed with a mental illness repeatedly seeking hospitalisation due to any reduction in the number of in-patient beds.
Answer
In all cases the aim is to match care to assessed needs. This can involve a mix of hospital and community based care, as an individual's needs change. Where re-admission is required this is of course arranged. The aim overall is to provide the right care where and when it is needed in each case. There has been a planned reduction of in-patient beds, which reflects the policy of providing more care and support from community settings where this is appropriate. Information on hospital in-patient beds and patients admitted are provided in the following tables. The underlying reason for re-admissions cannot be identified.Table 1: Trends in Average Occupied Hospital Beds and Available Staffed Hospital Beds in Psychiatry Years Ending 31 March 1990 to 31 March 2002, Scotland
1,2,3,4Year ending 31 March | Average available staffed beds | Average occupied beds | Average % occupancy |
1990 | 14,407 | 12,634 | 87.7 |
1991 | 13,927 | 12,159 | 87.3 |
1992 | 13,251 | 11,640 | 87.8 |
1993 | 12,561 | 11,179 | 89.0 |
1994 | 11,727 | 10,289 | 87.7 |
1995 | 11,034 | 9,754 | 88.4 |
1996 | 10,392 | 9,084 | 87.4 |
1997 | 9,580 | 8,358 | 87.2 |
1998 | 9,076 | 7,791 | 85.8 |
1999 | 8,674 | 7,358 | 84.8 |
2000 | 8,145 | 6,917 | 84.9 |
2001 | 7,760 | 6,547 | 84.4 |
2002 | 7.306 | 6,216 | 85.1 |
Source: ISD Scotland [Form: ISD(S)1].Notes:1. NHS locations include any joint-user and contractual hospitals providing the service.2. Average available staffed beds: borrowed and temporary beds are included. Derived as: all available staffed beds/days in period.3. Average occupied beds - Derived as: all occupied beds/days in period.4. Data for 2002 are provisional.Table 2: In-Patient Admissions to Hospital Psychiatric Beds Years Ending 31 March 1990 to 31 March 2001, Scotland
1,2,3,Year ending 31 March | No. of patients | No. of episodes | Average no. of episodes per patient |
1990 | 20,478 | 29,644 | 1.45 |
1991 | 20,589 | 30,372 | 1.48 |
1992 | 20,375 | 29,955 | 1.47 |
1993 | 20,238 | 29,639 | 1.46 |
1994 | 20,151 | 29,823 | 1.48 |
1995 | 20,169 | 30,172 | 1.50 |
1996 | 20,092 | 30,245 | 1.51 |
1997 | 20,724 | 31,674 | 1.53 |
1998 | 20,793 | 32,150 | 1.55 |
1999 | 20,701 | 31,624 | 1.53 |
2000 | 20,230 | 30,985 | 1.53 |
2001 | 19,642 | 30,197 | 1.54 |
Source: ISD Linked Database, September 2002.Notes:1. Each patient is counted only once in each year.2. Excludes admissions to the learning disabilities specialty.3. Data for 2001 are provisional.
- Asked by: Adam Ingram, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 29 August 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 24 September 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive when the Advocacy Safeguards Agency was established; what the total (a) cost of setting up the agency was and (b) running costs to date have been; what the remit of the agency is, and where the agency is based.
Answer
The Advocacy Safeguards Agency was established on 1 April 2002. The total budget for the agency for 2002-03 is £358,700. The cost of setting up the agency to 31 August is £7,169; the running costs up to 31 August are £63,992. The remit of the agency is divided into five core functions: developing support for commissioners; evaluation; policy development and implementation; research, and complaints and mediation. The agency is currently based in the offices of Scottish Human Services Trust in Edinburgh and is in the process of securing its own distinct, accessible premises.