- Asked by: Tricia Marwick, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 24 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Colin Boyd on 8 December 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive when the Deputy First Minister and Minister for Justice will reply to my letter of 1 September 2000 and reminder letters of 6 October and 10 November 2000.
Answer
The letter relates to a highly complex allegation of crime, which has been considered at length. A letter will be sent by 15 December.
- Asked by: Tricia Marwick, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Susan Deacon on 4 December 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-7241 by Susan Deacon on 1 August 2000 and the Scottish Needs Assessment programme report on multiple sclerosis (MS), whether it will assess the number of MS patients in each health board area who could benefit from prescription of Beta Interferon and what financial allocation will be made available for the prescription of the drug.
Answer
Only certain patients with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis are likely to benefit from the use of Beta Interferon. The question of whether an individual patient might benefit from this treatment is a matter for the clinical judgement of the specialist concerned, informed by advice and evidence about its use.
Health boards receive a unified budget which includes provision for prescribing. These funds are intended to cover all pressures, including the provision of new drugs and the greater use of existing therapies.
- Asked by: Tricia Marwick, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Susan Deacon on 4 December 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-9430 by Susan Deacon on 15 September 2000 and the Scottish Needs Assessment Programme report on multiple sclerosis (MS), and in the light of the relatively high incidence of MS in Scotland, whether it will advise the Chief Scientist Office to reconsider not contributing to Scottish, UK or European studies into MS treatment.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-11381 on 1 December 2000.
- Asked by: Tricia Marwick, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 17 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Susan Deacon on 1 December 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-4425 by Susan Deacon on 27 March 2000, whether it will direct any agency or body to undertake research into multiple sclerosis (MS) or take any other measures to actively promote research into MS, and whether it will make funding available for this purpose.
Answer
Within the Scottish Executive, the Chief Scientist Office (CSO) has responsibility for encouraging and supporting research into health services and patient care within the NHS in Scotland. It fulfils this function by funding specific projects, proposed by research institutions, which meet acceptable standards. This role is well advertised throughout the medical and academic community. Although CSO has no proposals to promote actively or commission research projects
on Multiple
Sclerosis at present, CSO would be pleased to make funding available for, or contribute to, studies of a sufficiently high standard.
More generally CSO provides infrastructure and support costs to the NHS to enable Trusts to participate in research being funded by the research councils and major charities. The Medical Research Council (MRC) is the main agency through which the UK Government supports biomedical and clinical research. CSO collaborates with other UK Health Departments and the MRC to develop and maintain an effective partnership for the promotion, funding and management of UK medical research.
- Asked by: Tricia Marwick, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus MacKay on 30 November 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive which non-departmental public bodies which have been abolished since May 1997, specifying in each case the body's remit, any public monies received in its last year of operation, and how many posts each had.
Answer
Details of public bodies abolished since May 1997 were provided in the answer to question S1W-8016. Information relating to the remits, funding and composition of these bodies is to be found in the relevant version of the annual
Public Bodies publication as listed below. Copies are available from the Cabinet Office Website at
www.cabinet-office.gov.uk/quango/index/pubs.htm.Title | Public Bodies - Version |
Advisory Committee on Dental Establishments | 1998 - Page 131 |
Scottish Agricultural Consultative Panel | 1998 - Page 135 |
Scottish Childcare Board | 1999 - Page 161 |
Scottish Community Education Council | 1998 - Page 128 |
Scottish Consultative Council on the Curriculum | 1999 - Page 161 |
Scottish Council for Educational Technology | 1999 - Page 154 |
Scottish Water and Sewage Customers Council | 1999 - Page 131 |
Details of the Potato Marketing Board and the Scottish Seed Potato Development Council are listed below. Both these bodies were replaced by the British Potato Council in 1997. Full details of the British Potato Council can be found in the 1998 version of Public Bodies.
Title | Remit | Funding | Composition |
Scottish Seed Potato Development Council | Promote the sales of Scottish seed potatoes at home and overseas. | Funded by a levy on all Scottish potato grower. | 1 - Chair Members - 16 |
Potato Marketing Board | Administer support arrangements for potatoes in the UK under the Potato Marketing Scheme. | Funded via a grower levy on planted areas. | 1 - Chair Members - 15 |
- Asked by: Tricia Marwick, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus MacKay on 30 November 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-8015 by Mr Jack McConnell on 30 October 2000, what each body's remit is, how much public money each receives and how many appointments have been made to each of them.
Answer
Details of the remits, funding and composition of the following Non-Departmental Public Bodies as listed in the answer to question S1W-8015 are included in the 1999 version of the Public Bodies document:
British Potato Council
The Clinical Standards Board for Scotland
Scottish Advisory Committee on Distinction Awards
Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission
Scottish Further Education Funding Council
This is available at www.cabinet-office.gov.uk/quango/index/pubs.htm. Information on the remaining bodies is set out in the table below:
Title | Remit | Amount Funded by Government | Composition |
Health Technology Board for Scotland | The Health Technology Board for Scotland was created to provide a single source of evidence-based advice to the National Health Service in Scotland on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of new and existing health technologies (drugs, devices, clinical procedures and settings) | £1 million | Chair - 1M Members - 5M, 2F |
Learning and Teaching Scotland | To promote and encourage understanding and application of educational technology in its widest sense | £1.337 million | Chair - 1M Members - 2M, 1F {2M, 2F} |
Water Industry Commissioner for Scotland | To promote the interests of customers of the new water and sewerage authorities and be responsible for all aspects of the economic and customer service regulation of the authorities. | Not directly funded by Government. Receives funding from a levy from the three Scottish Water Authorities (1.9 million). | 1 Commissioner |
The Scottish Advisory Committee on the Dental Workforce is not an NDPB as stated in question S1W-8015.
- Asked by: Tricia Marwick, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 15 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 23 November 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what additional finance it intends to make available in 2000-01 and 2001-02 to local authorities to subsidise local bus services.
Answer
Grant-aided expenditure (GAE) for bus support is £21.349 million in 2000-01. However, GAE allowances are not spending limits or targets. Grant allocations for each local authority for the next three years will be announced next month. Ultimately it is for each council to determine its expenditure on subsidising bus services from within its total resources.
- Asked by: Tricia Marwick, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 16 November 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it proposes to reconsider or review the Police (Scotland) Act 1967.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1O-02491 on 9 November 2000.
- Asked by: Tricia Marwick, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 31 October 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 14 November 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what action will be taken to ensure that any disciplinary or criminal investigations regarding the Chief Constable of Fife Constabulary are complete before he is permitted to take early retirement.
Answer
This is a matter for Fife police authority.
- Asked by: Tricia Marwick, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 31 October 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 14 November 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what powers it has to suspend the Chief Constable of Fife Constabulary until all internal disciplinary and criminal investigations regarding him are complete.
Answer
The Executive has no powers to suspend senior police officers including chief constables. It is for police authorities to decide whether suspension seems appropriate in particular cases and for Ministers to decide whether or not to approve a decision to suspend.