- Asked by: Roseanna Cunningham, MSP for Perth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 14 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Elish Angiolini on 11 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how many (a) reports to procurators fiscal, (b) proceedings taken by procurators fiscal and (c) convictions in respect of offences that were racially aggravated, as defined in section 96 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, there have been in each year since the Act came into force.
Answer
In the last year (April 2001 to March 2002) prosecutors received 1,315 cases from the police which either included charges of racially aggravated harassment behaviour or separate statutory racial aggravations. Proceedings which included either a statutory charge or aggravation were taken by procurators fiscal in 95% of these cases. There is no comprehensive information available regarding convictions. Continuing improvements in our office IT systems will enable us for the first time to track all cases which included separate statutory racial aggravations. Statistics from previous years have been included in the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service Annual Reports but were of a more limited nature.
- Asked by: Roseanna Cunningham, MSP for Perth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 12 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 11 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what assessment it has made of the progress of the operation of the contract for HM Prison Kilmarnock in comparison with the financial projection contained in schedule P of the Minute of Agreement between the Secretary of State for Scotland and Kilmarnock Prison Services Limited for the Design, Construction, Management and Financing of a Prison at Kilmarnock.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:No such assessment has been made but the contract costs are in line with those envisaged at the time of contract signature.
- Asked by: Roseanna Cunningham, MSP for Perth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 12 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 11 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will list all subsequent financing agreements, as defined in section 1.1.105 of the Minute of Agreement between the Secretary of State for Scotland and Kilmarnock Prison Services Limited for the Design, Construction, Management and Financing of a Prison at Kilmarnock.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:New financing agreements:
Change of Shareholders in Kilmarnock Prison Services Limited between SPS, Kilmarnock Prison Services Limited (KPSL), Kilmarnock Prison (Holdings) Limited (KPHL), Premier Custodial Investments Limited (PCIL) and Premier Custodial Group Limited (PCGL) dated 27 June 2000.Senior Debt Arrangements between SPS, KPSL, Premier Custodial Finance Limited (PCFL) and the Bank of Scotland (BofS), Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank Limited, WestDeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale, Credit Lyonnais and Barclays Bank plc (the Banks) dated 27 June 2000.Subordinated Debt Arrangements between SPS, The Governor and Company of the BofS, PCFL, KPSL and PCIL dated 27 June 2000.Side Letter regarding the Senior Facility Agreement dated 9 August 2000.Side Letter regarding the Subordinated Facility Agreement dated 9 August 2000.Subordinated Debt Accession Agreement between Serco Investments Limited (SIL), Wackenhut Corrections (UK) Limited (WCUK), the Banks, BofS and PCFL dated 30 June 2000.Debenture between PCFL and BofS dated 30 June 2000.Amended financing agreements:Senior Facility Agreement between PCFL and the Banks as amended and restated on 30 June 2000.Subordinated Facility Agreement between PCFL, SIL, WCUK, BofS and the Banks as amended and restated on 30 June 2000.On-Loan Agreement between PCFL, PCIL, BofS and the Banks as amended and restated on 30 June 2000.Intercreditor Agreement between PCFL, the Banks, BofS, SIL, Serco Limited (SL), WCUK, Serco Group plc (SG) and Wackenhut Corrections Corporation (WCC) as amended and restated on 3 July 2000.Shareholders' Agreement between WCC, WCUK, SL, SG, SIL, PCGL, PCIL, KPSL and KPHL dated 30 June 2000.Shareholders' Undertaking between the Banks, WCC, WCUK, SG, SIL, PCIL, PCGL, PCFL, KPSL, KPHL and BofS dated 30 June 2000.
- Asked by: Roseanna Cunningham, MSP for Perth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 26 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 10 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-30810 by Mr Jim Wallace on 12 November 2002, what assessment it made of best value when deciding to contract out education services in prisons.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:The education contracts were competitively tendered in accordance with European Union rules. Bids from reputable education providers were initially assessed for educational capability and capacity to provide the required range of services. Commercial factors including cost were also assessed and each bid evaluated in total with the emphasis on educational quality.
- Asked by: Roseanna Cunningham, MSP for Perth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 26 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 10 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-30691 by Dr Richard Simpson on 8 November 2002, what the cost was of work done by its officials on clauses of, and amendments to, the Extradition Bill and who bore the costs.
Answer
An estimate of the cost of the work could only be provided at disproportionate cost. The expenditure involved was borne by the Scottish Executive.
- Asked by: Roseanna Cunningham, MSP for Perth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 26 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Colin Boyd on 10 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-30797 by Colin Boyd QC on 12 November 2002, how much has been spent on ad hoc or temporary procurator fiscal deputes in each sheriff court district in each year since 1999-2000.
Answer
Expenditure on temporary procurator fiscal deputes by Procurator Fiscal office for the most recent years available was:
| | 1999-2000 (£) | 2000-01 (£) | 2001-02 (£) |
| Aberdeen | 860 | 13,665 | 26,650 |
| Airdrie | 41,253 | 36,881 | 18,964 |
| Arbroath | - | - | 705 |
| Ayr | 1,850 | 4,050 | 7,050 |
| Campbeltown | 1,800 | 450 | 4,200 |
| Cupar | - | 705 | - |
| Dumbarton | 4,450 | 17,055 | 14,659 |
| Dundee | 8,039 | 12,670 | 10,676 |
| Dunfermline | 6,607 | 2,291 | 881 |
| Duns | - | 150 | - |
| Edinburgh | 42,433 | 105,993 | 52,069 |
| Falkirk | 16,582 | - | 18,454 |
| Forfar | - | - | 353 |
| Fort William | - | 1,234 | - |
| Glasgow | 178,506 | 150,754 | 236,571 |
| Greenock | - | 3,968 | 1,800 |
| Hamilton | 25,604 | 40,669 | 89,749 |
| Jedburgh | - | - | 2,100 |
| Kirkcudbright | 3,904 | 2,100 | 3,000 |
| Kirkcaldy | 21,802 | 10,046 | 5,640 |
| Kilmarnock | 2,795 | 9,595 | 881 |
| Kirkwall | 1,500 | 1,500 | 1,500 |
| Lerwick | 1,694 | 1,800 | 1,571 |
| Linlithgow | 47,012 | 12,806 | 22,312 |
| Lanark | 585 | 1,586 | 2,001 |
| Oban | - | 750 | 1,350 |
| Paisley | 10,240 | 12,289 | 35,139 |
| Peebles | - | 150 | - |
| Perth | 16,257 | 39,248 | 21,212 |
| Selkirk | - | 2,231 | 6,880 |
| Stranraer | 1,670 | 150 | - |
| Stirling | 4,574 | 1,058 | 7,705 |
| Stornoway | 375 | 1,500 | 2,250 |
| Wick | 1,603 | - | - |
Since summer 2002 the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service has recruited over 40 new Procurator Fiscal Deputes. These permanent staff will lead to a reduction in the use of ad hoc and temporary fiscals.
- Asked by: Roseanna Cunningham, MSP for Perth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 26 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 10 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-30798 by Mr Jim Wallace on 12 November 2002, what the results have been of consultation with (a) procurators fiscal and (b) sheriffs on the use of civilian staff for court security and prisoner handling.
Answer
These discussions have been extremely helpful and have informed the amendments which are being tabled to section 61 of the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill.
- Asked by: Roseanna Cunningham, MSP for Perth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 26 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 10 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what sanctions it imposes on the Scottish Prison Service Board in respect of any failure to meet the targets the Executive has set in respect of the Scottish Prison Service.
Answer
As an Executive Agency, the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) is accountable to Scottish ministers for all operational and contractual matters involving the agency and for it's performance. The accountability framework specifying the responsibilities of the Chief Executive and the SPS board is contained in the SPS Framework Document. The performance of senior managers in the SPS is managed within the Senior Civil Service Performance Appraisal System which applies to the Senior Civil Service across the United Kingdom.
- Asked by: Roseanna Cunningham, MSP for Perth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 26 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 10 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-30372 by Mr Jim Wallace on 12 November 2002, how many injuries that were reportable to the Health and Safety Executive there were in each prison in the first half of 2002-03.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:
| Aberdeen | 6 |
| Barlinnie | 29 |
| Castle Huntly | 1 |
| Cornton Vale | 6 |
| Dumfries | 3 |
| Edinburgh | 10 |
| Glenochil | 6 |
| Greenock | 9 |
| Inverness | 2 |
| Low Moss | 6 |
| Noranside | 1 |
| Perth | 4 |
| Peterhead | 2 |
| Polmont | 5 |
| Shotts | 13 |
- Asked by: Roseanna Cunningham, MSP for Perth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 26 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 10 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will define the term "unfit places", as referred to on page 7 of the Justice section in Spending Proposals 2003-2006 - Technical Notes.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) to respond. His response is as follows:The term "unfit places" relates to prisoner places with no access to night sanitation. The SPS is committed to developing a prison estate "fit for purpose" for the 21st century and thereby phasing out the use of such places as circumstances and finance permit.