- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 08 December 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 19 January 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2F-379 by Mr Jack McConnell on 27 November 2003, whether, and, if so, by how much, the median averages given in the figures for waiting times for the quarter to September 2003 differs from the mean averages for each quarter since 1997.
Answer
The information requested isshown in the following table.
| Difference in Median Wait and Mean Wait (days) |
Quarter Ended | In-patient/Day Case Waiting Times | First Out-patient Appointment Waiting Times |
| Median | Mean | Difference | Median | Mean | Difference |
30 June 1997 | 34 | 59.6 | -25.6 | 40 | 54.0 | -14.0 |
30 September 1997 | 34 | 60.7 | -26.7 | 45 | 60.2 | -15.2 |
31 December 1997 | 32 | 58.8 | -26.8 | 44 | 61.7 | -17.7 |
31 March 1998 | 33 | 60.7 | -27.7 | 43 | 60.7 | -17.7 |
30 June 1998 | 32 | 59.4 | -27.4 | 43 | 59.3 | -16.3 |
30 September 1998 | 33 | 60.4 | -27.4 | 48 | 64.0 | -16.0 |
31 December 1998 | 31 | 59.2 | -28.2 | 48 | 64.8 | -16.8 |
31 March 1999 | 33 | 57.9 | -24.9 | 47 | 66.2 | -19.2 |
30 June 1999 | 30 | 53.5 | -23.5 | 46 | 64.3 | -18.3 |
30 September 1999 | 31 | 54.9 | -23.9 | 51 | 69.2 | -18.2 |
31 December 1999 | 30 | 53.6 | -23.6 | 50 | 69.6 | -19.6 |
31 March 2000 | 33 | 57.1 | -24.1 | 48 | 68.7 | -20.7 |
30 June 2000 | 32 | 58.9 | -26.9 | 47 | 65.0 | -18.0 |
30 September 2000 | 35 | 62.7 | -27.7 | 50 | 68.3 | -18.3 |
31 December 2000 | 34 | 62.1 | -28.1 | 50 | 71.9 | -21.9 |
31 March 2001 | 35 | 62.4 | -27.4 | 51 | 78.0 | -27.0 |
30 June 2001 | 33 | 61.1 | -28.1 | 50 | 73.4 | -23.4 |
30 September 2001 | 34 | 63.4 | -29.4 | 56 | 77.2 | -21.2 |
31 December 2001 | 32 | 61.8 | -29.8 | 55 | 80.0 | -25.0 |
31 March 2002 | 33 | 64.3 | -31.3 | 56 | 83.3 | -27.3 |
30 June 2002 | 31 | 61.0 | -30.0 | 54 | 84.1 | -30.1 |
30 September 2002 | 34 | 66.5 | -32.5 | 57 | 87.6 | -30.6 |
31 December 2002 | 34 | 68.5 | -34.5 | 57 | 91.0 | -34.0 |
31 March 2003 | 38 | 75.2 | -37.2 | 56 | 91.8 | -35.8 |
30 June 2003 | 38 | 76.3 | -38.3 | 51 | 85.0 | -34.0 |
30 September 2003 | 41 | 80.1 | -39.1 | 54 | 87.2 | -33.2 |
Note: Data for the mostrecent quarters should be considered provisional.
Inpatient/Day case data issourced from the SMR01 dataset, Outpatient data is sourced from the SMR00dataset, and covers referrals from a GMP/GDP to a consultant led outpatientclinic.
- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 08 December 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 19 January 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2F-379 by Mr Jack McConnell on 27 November 2003, what the range of values in the dataset of waiting times is for the latest waiting times figures for (a) out-patients and (b) in-patients and day cases and what the greatest value is in each case.
Answer
The following table showsthe minimum value and the value of the 99th. percentile of the waiting timesdistributions. The use of the 99th percentile for the maximum value is anappropriate statistical convention to remove outliers due to recording error.
In-patient/Day Case Waiting Times | First Out-patient Appointment Waiting Times |
Minimum Value (days) | 99th. Percentile Value (days) | Minimum Value (days) | 99th Percentile Value (days) |
0 | 489 | 0 | 442 |
Note: Data is for quarterend September 2003, and should be considered provisional.
In-patient/Day case data issourced from the SMR01 dataset, Out-patient data is sourced from the SMR00dataset, and covers referrals from a GMP/GDP to a consultant led out-patientclinic.
- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 08 December 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 19 January 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2F-379 by Mr Jack McConnell on 27 November 2003, what the standard deviation is in the latest waiting times figures for (a) out-patients and (b) in-patients and day cases.
Answer
The information requested is shown in the following table.
First Outpatient Appointment Waiting Times Standard Deviation (days) | Inpatient/Day Case Waiting Times Standard Deviation (days) |
123.7 | 108.9 |
Note: Data is for quarterend September 2003, and should be regarded as provisional.
In-patient/Day case data issourced from the SMR01 dataset, Out-patient data is sourced from the SMR00dataset, and covers referrals from a GMP/GDP to a consultant led out-patientclinic.
- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 08 December 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 19 January 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2F-379 by Mr Jack McConnell on 27 November 2003, whether the waiting times data has symmetrical distribution or whether it is skewed and, if so, in what way.
Answer
Waiting times data follow ahighly positively skewed distribution Consequently, the median is the mostappropriate measure of central tendency in these datasets.
- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 08 December 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 19 January 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2F-379 by Mr Jack McConnell on 27 November 2003, whether, and, if so, by how much, the median average given in the figures for waiting times for the quarter to September 2003 differs from the mode average in those figures for (a) out-patients and (b) in-patients and day cases.
Answer
The information requested is shown in the following table.
The out-patient mode value of 0 days accounts for around 4% of cases and includes, for example, patients who attend “drop-in” out-patient clinics and urgent same day referrals from General Medical Practitioners.
The in-patient mode value of 1 day accounts for around 4% cases and includes, for example, patients where a clinical decision has been made to treat them urgently and a session is available at short notice.
| Difference in Median Wait and Mode Wait (days) |
Quarter ended | In-patient/Day Case Waiting Times | First Out-patient Appointment Waiting Times |
30 Sept 2003 | Median | Mode | Difference | Median | Mode | Difference |
41 | 1 | +40 | 54 | 0 | +54 |
Note: Data is for quarterend September 2003, and should be considered provisional.
In-patient/day case data issourced from the SMR01 dataset, Out-patient data is sourced from the SMR00dataset, and covers referrals from a GMP/GDP to a consultant led out-patientclinic.
- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 08 December 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 19 January 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2F-379 by Mr Jack McConnell on 27 November 2003, whether, and, if so, by how much, the median averages given in the figures for waiting times for the quarter to September 2003 differs from the mode averages for each quarter since 1997.
Answer
The information requested is shown in the following table.
| Difference in Median Wait and Mode Wait (days) |
Quarter Ended | In-patient/Day Case Waiting Times | First Out-patient Appointment Waiting Times |
| Median | Mode | Difference | Median | Mode | Difference |
30 June 1997 | 34 | 1 | +33 | 40 | 0 | +40 |
30 September 1997 | 34 | 7 | +27 | 45 | 0 | +45 |
31 December 1997 | 32 | 1 | +31 | 44 | 0 | +44 |
31 March 1998 | 33 | 1 | +32 | 43 | 0 | +43 |
30 June 1998 | 32 | 1 | +31 | 43 | 0 | +43 |
30 September 1998 | 33 | 1 | +32 | 48 | 0 | +48 |
31 December 1998 | 31 | 7 | +24 | 48 | 0 | +48 |
31 March 1999 | 33 | 1 | +32 | 47 | 0 | +47 |
30 June 1999 | 30 | 1 | +29 | 46 | 0 | +46 |
30 September 1999 | 31 | 1 | +30 | 51 | 0 | +51 |
31 December 1999 | 30 | 1 | +29 | 50 | 0 | +50 |
31 March 2000 | 33 | 1 | +32 | 48 | 0 | +48 |
30 June 2000 | 32 | 1 | +31 | 47 | 0 | +47 |
30 September 2000 | 35 | 1 | +34 | 50 | 0 | +50 |
31 December 2000 | 34 | 1 | +33 | 50 | 0 | +50 |
31 March 2001 | 35 | 1 | +34 | 51 | 0 | +51 |
30 June 2001 | 33 | 1 | +32 | 50 | 0 | +50 |
30 September 2001 | 34 | 1 | +33 | 56 | 0 | +56 |
31 December 2001 | 32 | 1 | +31 | 55 | 0 | +55 |
31 March 2002 | 33 | 1 | +32 | 56 | 0 | +56 |
30 June 2002 | 31 | 1 | +30 | 54 | 0 | +54 |
30 September 2002 | 34 | 1 | +33 | 57 | 0 | +57 |
31 December 2002 | 34 | 1 | +33 | 57 | 0 | +57 |
31 March 2003 | 38 | 1 | +37 | 56 | 0 | +56 |
30 June 2003 | 38 | 1 | +37 | 51 | 0 | +51 |
30 September 2003 | 41 | 1 | +40 | 54 | 0 | +54 |
Note: Data for the most recent quarters should be considered as provisional.
In-patient/Day case data is sourced from the SMR01 dataset, Out-patient data is sourced from the SMR00 dataset, and covers referrals from a GMP/GDP to a consultant led out-patient clinic.
- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 08 December 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 19 January 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2F-379 by Mr Jack McConnell on 27 November 2003, what percentage of out-patients was seen within (a) 39 weeks and (b) 52 weeks.
Answer
The information requested isshown in the following table.
Percentage of First Out-patient Appointments seen within 39 weeks of Referral Date | Percentage of First Out-patient Appointments seen within 52 weeks of Referral Date |
94.0% | 97.0% |
Note: Data is for quarterend September 2003, and should be considered provisional.
In-patient/Day case data issourced from the SMR01 dataset, Out-patient data is sourced from the SMR00dataset, and covers referrals from a GMP/GDP to a consultant led out-patientclinic.
- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 08 December 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 19 January 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2F-379 by Mr Jack McConnell on 27 November 2003, whether, and, if so, by how much, the median average given in the figures for waiting times for the quarter to September 2003, differs from the mean average in those figures for (a) out-patients and (b) in-patients and day cases.
Answer
The information requested isshown in the following table,
| Difference in Median Wait & Mean Wait (days) |
Quarter ended | In-patient/Day Case Waiting Times | First Out-patient Appointment Waiting Times |
30 Sept 2003 | Median | Mean | Difference | Median | Mean | Difference |
41 | 80.1 | -39.1 | 54 | 87.2 | -33.2 |
Note: Data is for quarterend September 2003, and should be considered provisional.
In-patient/day case data issourced from the SMR01 dataset, Out-patient data is sourced from the SMR00dataset, and covers referrals from a GMP/GDP to a consultant led out-patientclinic.
- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 11 December 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Margaret Curran on 14 January 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to the fifth supplementary to question S2O-867 by Ms Margaret Curran on 4 December 2003, what restrictions will be placed on local authorities that move to a prudential regime for housing provision.
Answer
The prudential regime willbe introduced for all local authorities from April 2004 and will replace theexisting section 94 consent from ministers that permits local authorities to incurcapital expenditure.
From April 2004, it will befor individual authorities to decide for themselves what is an affordable andprudent level of borrowing in their circumstances. Ministers will, however,retain step in powers if there is an unsustainable increase in borrowing eitheracross the UK as a whole, across Scotland or at an individualcouncil level.
- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 11 December 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Margaret Curran on 14 January 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what analysis has been carried out of the impact of the Homelessness etc. (Scotland) Act 2003 on the number of homelessness presentations.
Answer
The Homelessness etc. (Scotland)Act 2003 has not yet been commenced so no analysis of its impact has been possible.
Local authorities have beenpreparing for commencement of their duties under the new legislation throughtheir homelessness strategies. The phasing of the abolition of priority need,changes to the duties owed to intentionally homeless households andmodification of the local connection provisions will be informed by researchstudies to be undertaken during 2004.
The first commencement orderfor the 2003 act will come into force on 30 January 2004.