- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 06 August 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 31 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to the question S7W-01610 by Maree Todd on 5th August 2026, whether, and on what timeline, it will publish the recommendations provided by the six Long Term Conditions Advisory Groups.
Answer
As indicated in Parliamentary Question S7W-01610 on 5 August 2026, the Long Term Conditions Advisory Groups, were established under the previous government to provide recommendations to inform our way forward for long term conditions. It is for Scottish Ministers to decide whether and to what extent any of the recommendations become government policy. We are carefully considering these recommendations as we develop this work.
We are grateful to all members of the Advisory Groups for their involvement in developing these recommendations and continue to engage with the Advisory Groups as this work develops.
All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 August 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 28 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the £10 million Travel Fund for children and young people with cancer being introduced in England in 2027, and the Welsh Government's announcement that work has begun on an equivalent fund in Wales, whether it will ensure that equivalent support regarding the costs of travelling to treatment is available for children and young people with cancer in Scotland, whether by expanding the eligibility criteria of the Young Patients Family Fund or through a separate scheme.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S7W-01758 on 3 August 2026. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 29 July 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 25 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what the (a) total expenditure on prescription medicines and (b) average cost per prescription item dispensed was, in each financial year from 2021-22 to the latest date for which information is available.
Answer
The requested information is shown in the following table.
Table 1: Prescription Cost Analysis Totals
Paid Financial Year | Number of dispensed Items | Gross ingredient cost (£) | Cost per item (£) |
2021-22 | 106,601,987 | 1,168,834,872 | 10.96 |
2022-23 | 110,339,683 | 1,235,560,290 | 11.20 |
2023-24 | 113,609,076 | 1,305,189,021 | 11.49 |
2024-25 | 116,527,075 | 1,318,286,930 | 11.31 |
Source: Public Health Scotland Prescribing Information System
This data is based on prescriptions dispensed by community pharmacy contractors, appliance suppliers and dispensing doctors. This data also excludes prescriptions dispensed in England. Gross Ingredient Cost (GIC) is the cost of medicines and appliances dispensed and reimbursed at list price.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 29 July 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 25 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government how much has been spent on prescribing (a) aspirin and (b) paracetamol, in each financial year from 2021-22 to the latest date for which information is available.
Answer
The requested information is shown in the following table.
Prescription Cost Analysis – Aspirin and Paracetamol
Paid Financial Year | BNF drug/device name | Number of dispensed items | Gross ingredient cost (£) |
2021-22 | ASPIRIN | 1,786,645 | 1,798,992 |
| | PARACETAMOL | 2,362,586 | 9,775,540 |
2022-23 | ASPIRIN | 1,756,051 | 2,678,122 |
| | PARACETAMOL | 2,459,823 | 11,755,882 |
2023-24 | ASPIRIN | 1,746,735 | 3,109,038 |
| | PARACETAMOL | 2,472,463 | 14,154,347 |
2024-25 | ASPIRIN | 1,741,667 | 3,149,495 |
| | PARACETAMOL | 2,530,044 | 15,500,371 |
Source: Public Health Scotland: Prescribing Information System
The data shown is based on prescriptions dispensed by community pharmacy contractors, appliance suppliers and dispensing doctors only.
The data excludes prescriptions dispensed in England and does not include combination products.
Gross Ingredient Cost (GIC) is the cost of medicines and appliances dispensed and reimbursed at list price.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 July 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 25 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether the current Cabinet Secretary for Justice has met representatives of the Fire Brigades Union and, if so, what was discussed.
Answer
I met with the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) on 20 August, to discuss a range of matters of importance to the FBU.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 July 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 24 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether the ALLIANCE provided a report on the consultation events held by the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service as part of its Strategic Services Review Programme, including a report on the Helensburgh consultation event.
Answer
ALLIANCE compiled a report of all the public meetings their staff facilitated as part of the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service, Service Delivery Review (SDR) public consultation.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 July 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 24 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S7W-00815 by Maree Todd on 16 June 2026, what the timetable is for bringing bowel screening in line with the UK NSC recommendations.
Answer
S7W-00815 refers to prostate cancer screening. Information on both bowel and prostate cancer screening is set out below.
Since 2009, Scotland has offered bowel screening in line with the current UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) recommendations; screening is offered every two years to people aged between 50 and 74. Those aged 75 and over can also request a kit every two years. In July 2026, the Scottish Government submitted a proposal to the UK NSC to review their recommended age range, highlighting that the number of bowel cancers are increasing in those under the age of 50.
As noted in the answer to S7W-00815, our initial focus is on strengthening existing high-risk surveillance pathways for prostate cancer, which already allow eligible men to access testing in line with the UK NSC recommendation. This work will progress at pace, and will be completed ahead of any implementation of a national screening programme, which will require a number of formal processes to be developed, including a dedicated IT system.
To support both pieces of work, we have established a multi-disciplinary Prostate Cancer Screening Working Group (PCSWG).
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 July 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 24 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S7W-00820 by Maree Todd on 16 June 2026, whether there are any plans to run recruitment campaigns to increase the number of people volunteering for clinical trials.
Answer
Individual Clinical Trials run public recruitment campaigns if needed to meet their recruitment targets.
The NHS Research Scotland Infrastructure is available to support this activity through both the Scottish Research Register and Biobank Recruitment to clinical trials | NHS Research Scotland | NHS Research Scotland, and Topic-specific Research Networks Research Areas | NHS Research Scotland | NHS Research Scotland.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 July 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 24 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what revenue will be available for reallocation (a) overall and (b) at Helensburgh Fire Station, as a result of the changes made following the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service Review.
Answer
The changes approved by the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) Board will be delivered over the next 5 years with SFRS developing a change programme.
a) In the short term, there will be no net savings from the review as the total number of wholetime firefighters employed by SFRS will not reduce and there will be additional on-call firefighters (20 new posts) to be recruited. 69 wholetime firefighters in front-line fire stations will be redirected to the essential training and prevention roles. It is expected any savings from building maintenance or future capital expenditure avoided will be invested in other parts of the SFRS estate.
b) With regards to Helensburgh Fire Station, when the changes are implemented, around four wholetime pump crews (17 people), equating to £779,000 salary costs, would be available for reallocation elsewhere in the service, as only one expanded crew would be required for operating the Day Shift Duty System (DSDS). Additional on call staff, costing approximately £109,000 per annum, will be required for providing additional resilience in the evenings and weekends for the DSDS/On-call pump. Costs of approximately £67,000 in relation to training the on call crew and swift water and flood response capability will also be required. This reduced staff footprint will realise property related cost reductions of approximately £23,000 annually. It should be noted that Helensburgh and the wider area will benefit from staff being redeployed into community safety/prevention and training roles.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 July 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 24 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government how much the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service paid to the ALLIANCE to facilitate the consultation on the Strategic Service Review Programme.
Answer
The Scottish Fire and Rescue Service paid ALLIANCE £18,416 (ex vat) for the design, facilitation and reporting on in-person public meetings as part of the Service Delivery Review (SDR) consultation. This included the participation of multiple ALLIANCE staff as note-takers during breakout table discussions.