- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 23 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government when it will open the next funding round for the Just Transition Fund.
Answer
We have secured £15.9m capital and £1m resource for the JTF in the 2026-27 budget. We will announce plans for managing this spend in due course. We remain committed to supporting the net-zero transition across North-East Scotland and Moray, diversifying the regional economy, generating new jobs and prosperity, and delivering measurable outcomes in skills and economic opportunities.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus Robertson on 23 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether Moray Council is eligible for funding from the Historic Environment Grants Programme to help repair the Spey Viaduct bridge.
Answer
Questions regarding day-to-day operational matters of Historic Environment Scotland, including queries relating to any Grant applications or eligibility, are best answered directly by Historic Environment Scotland.
I would suggest that Moray Council contact Historic Environment Scotland directly at [email protected] to discuss the Spey Viaduct Bridge repair project and any potential funding options. Further information on Historic Environment Scotland’s Grant Schemes is available at https://www.historicenvironment.scot/grants-and-funding/.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 23 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide a breakdown of the funding awarded to each local authority from the Just Transition Fund in each year since 2022, also broken down by each project that was awarded funding.
Answer
A breakdown of funding provided to local authorities from the Just Transition Fund is given in the following table. This provides details of each project that has been awarded funding:
| Fund | Recipient / Organisation | Project | Description | Year | Total Award | 2022-23 | 2023-24 | 2024-25 | 2025-26 |
| Just Transition Fund | Moray Council | Just Transition Masterplan – Moray Council | Five interlinked projects to support Moray’s journey away from fossil fuels, including projects to support offshore renewables, creation of a local hydrogen economy, natural capital approach to offsetting, and redeveloping derelict land and premises. | 2022 - 2024 | £881 k | £250,544.62 | £215,967.68 | £172,471 | £0 |
| Just Transition Fund | Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire, and Moray Councils | NESS Carbon Capture Feasibility Study | Study to determine if there is a viable project to retrofit carbon capture systems to the NESS energy facility. | 2022 - 2023 | £100 k | £96,750 | £0 | £0 | £0 |
| Just Transition Fund | Moray Council | Development of a Strategic Outline Case for Moray Growth Deal Skills & Development Project | The programme supports six linked projects in Moray, advancing renewable energy, nature restoration, low-carbon housing, and green enterprise to drive economic, social, and environmental benefits. | 2025-2026 | £40k | £0 | £0 | £0 | £40k |
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 23 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what the current yearly lease payments payable to CMAL by CalMac is for each vessel in the current CMAL fleet.
Answer
The vessel leasing costs for the current contract period (Oct '25 to March '26) payable by CalMac Ferries to Caledonian Maritime Assets Limited (CMAL), for vessels currently operating the Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Service are detailed in the following table.
VESSEL | |
Argyle | £ 429,313 |
Bute | £ 425,223 |
Caledonian Isles | £ 290,297 |
Catriona | £ 621,479 |
Clansman | £ 605,125 |
Coruisk | £ 294,387 |
Finlaggan | £ 1,189,809 |
Glen Sannox | £ 2,248,095 |
Hallaig | £ 580,593 |
Hebrides | £ 621,483 |
Isle of Arran | £ 89,953 |
Isle of Cumbrae | £ 8,177 |
Isle of Lewis | £ 453,845 |
Isle of Mull | £ 179,902 |
Loch Alainn | £ 73,595 |
Loch Bhrusda | £ 49,063 |
Loch Buie | £ 28,618 |
Loch Dunvegan | £ 69,508 |
Loch Fyne | £ 69,508 |
Loch Linnhe | £ 16,354 |
Loch Portain | £ 188,080 |
Loch Ranza | £ 20,445 |
Loch Riddon | £ 20,445 |
Loch Seaforth | £ 1,461,880 |
Loch Shira | £ 310,741 |
Loch Striven | £ 16,354 |
Loch Tarbert | £ 36,799 |
Lochnevis | £ 200,344 |
Lochinvar | £ 621,483 |
Lord of the Isles | £ 200,344 |
Loch Frisa | £ 2,094 |
Cavoria | £ 21,914 |
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the potential impact on Scotland’s forests of its proposed budget reduction of 40.2% to Forestry and Land Scotland in its draft Budget 2026-27.
Answer
The 40.2% reduction compares the FY 25/26 budget, including Autumn Budget Revision (ABR) transfers with the FY 26/27 budget.
During the FY 2025-26, Forestry and Land Scotland received a £7.0m transfer for Peatland and Atlantic Rainforest restoration on Scotland’s national forests and land as part of the ABR. Allocation of funding for those activities in FY 2026-27 to delivery partners (including FLS) has yet to agreed.
If this transfer is removed to enable a like-for-like comparison, the reduction is 22% (£5.0m), which relates to funding for woodland creation on Scotland’s national forests and land.
There is a corresponding increase in the capital allocation to Scottish Forestry. The Scottish Government is placing a greater emphasis on supporting woodland creation through the Forestry Grant Scheme (FGS).
Focusing woodland creation through the FGS offers improved value for money for the taxpayer, as the FGS only partially covers the cost of tree planting, requiring private investment to meet remaining costs and to purchase the land.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 22 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to reports that Argyll and Bute Health and Social Care Partnership is considering reducing its responder service as part of wider budget savings.
Answer
The Scottish Government wants to ensure that people are supported to live independently in their own homes and communities.
However, decisions on how best to deliver services for local communities are ultimately for integration authorities to make. This has to be a continuous way of working that appropriately seeks to understand the needs of local people and how best to meet them.
The Scottish Government would encourage all local partners to work together to find solutions that not only address financial pressures, but put the needs of local people – particularly those most vulnerable – at the centre.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 22 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on how many new homes have been delivered as a result of the Rural Affordable Homes for Key Workers Fund.
Answer
The Rural Affordable Homes for Key Workers Fund is demand-led and requires local authorities and Registered Social Landlords to identify proposals where there is identified need. To date, 25 homes have been delivered through the Fund, with a total of 41 homes having been approved. My officials regularly engage with local authorities and RSLs to encourage proposals to be brought forward.
The Fund complements our broader Affordable Housing Supply Programme which has delivered more than 12,000 homes in rural and island communities between April 2016 and March 2024, including to meet the need for key workers.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 21 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-42815 by Gillian Martin on 13 January 2026, whether it will instruct SEPA to carry out formal weekly water scarcity reports outside of the May to September period, as well as seasonal reports.
Answer
While SEPA typically produces weekly water scarcity reports from May to September, it extends the weekly reporting period as conditions require. In 2025 weekly reporting started in April and continued into October due to conditions.
Weekly reports are designed for the period of highest hydrological risk, when frequent updates offer the greatest value to both abstractors and public bodies. Extending weekly reporting across the full year, rather than responding to when conditions require it, does not represent the best use of resources at this time.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 08 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 21 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-42664 by Angela Constance on 5 January 2026, whether Upside provides it with details of the number of individuals released from prison who have received funding from its partner organisations, and, if so, whether it will provide details of this.
Answer
Upside does not provide funding directly to individuals released from custody.
As covered in the answer to question S6W-42664, funding is issued on a quarterly basis to Sacro as the nominated lead parter of Upside. Sacro distributes the funding to the remaining third-sector partners within the Upside partnership. This funding is used to support the operational delivery of the programme, including staff salaries, recruitment and training, IT and other associated running costs.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 January 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 21 January 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what harbour (a) dues and (b) charges were paid by CalMac to (i) CMAL, (ii) other harbour authorities and (iii) local authorities in 2024-25 broken down by harbour.
Answer
The cost of harbour dues CalMac Ferries paid in 2024-25 paid to CMAL was £16,589,235, other harbour authorities was £11,702,717, and Local Authorities was £12,822,773
Details relating to each harbour is detailed in the following table:
Harbour | £ | Harbour | £ |
Armadale | 529,669 | Campbeltown | 868 |
Brodick | 2,064,945 | Craignure | 1,886,150 |
Castlebay | 343,320 | Dunoon | 740,498 |
Claonaig | 160,033 | Fionnphort | 315,140 |
Colintraive | 681,109 | Gigha | 198,939 |
Coll | 480,858 | Iona | 323,910 |
Colonsay | 214,672 | Kilcreggan | 57,904 |
Cumbrae Slip | 1,299,130 | Lismore | 74,205 |
Fishnish | 339,205 | Port Askaig | 845,193 |
Gallanach | 17,709 | Rothesay | 2,787,920 |
Gourock | 347,651 | Tayinloan | 199,034 |
Kennacraig | 1,193,888 | Aird Mhor (Barra) | 117,659 |
Kerrera | 47,153 | Berneray | 194,694 |
Kilchoan | 61,278 | Eriskay | 108,539 |
Largs | 1,273,275 | Leverburgh | 148,710 |
Lochaline Slip | 354,795 | Lochmaddy | 968,604 |
Lochboisdale | 208,314 | Eigg | 102,662 |
Lochranza | 160,707 | Muck | 112,611 |
Oban | 2,419,536 | Raasay | 348,180 |
Port Ellen | 600,955 | Rum | 123,770 |
Portavadie | 129,233 | Sconser | 348,180 |
Rhubodach | 663,733 | Uig | 2,819,401 |
Tarbert | 1,909 | Troon | 3,428,891 |
Tarbert Harris | 392,750 | Mallaig | 896,986 |
Tiree | 257,756 | Canna | 298,649 |
Tobermory | 106,908 | Stornoway | 3,261,314 |
Wemyss Bay | 2,238,745 | Tarbert (Loch Fyne) | 153,920 |
Ardrossan | 1,051,428 | Ullapool | 2,611,529 |