- Asked by: Russell Findlay, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 09 May 2023
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 9 May 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is regarding reports that a new contract has been awarded by the Scottish Police Authority, valued at around £663,000, for the provision of additional forensic testing in relation to suspected cases of spiking.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 9 May 2023
- Asked by: Russell Findlay, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 06 April 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by George Adam on 5 May 2023
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the change of First Minister, whether it will provide an update on how many Special Advisers it now employs, broken down by (a) job title, (b) who they work for and (c) pay scale.
Answer
Special Advisers are appointed in accordance with Part 1 of the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 by the First Minister as a Special Adviser for the purpose of providing assistance to the Scottish Ministers. All Special Advisers are appointed by, and remain under the responsibility of, the First Minister.
As at the date of your request, the following Special Advisers were in post:
Colin McAllister
Callum McCaig
Jeanette Campbell
Gavin Corbett
Ewan Crawford
Jennie Gollan
David Hutchison
Harry Huyton
Ross Ingebrigtsen
Emily Mackintosh
Jack Middleton
The Pay Bands and Pay Ranges for those Special Advisers are as follows:
Pay Band | Pay Range (£) | Number of SpAds in Band |
1 | £53,915 - £56,428 | 0 |
2 | £58,946 - £72,441 | 4 |
3 | £74,650 - £95,019 | 6 |
4 | £101,088 - £107,149 | 1 |
Since the date of your request, further Special Adviser appointments have been made and a current list of Special Advisers and their responsibilities can be found on the Scottish Government website
- Asked by: Russell Findlay, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 April 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 4 May 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on the conclusion of the Glasgow Local Authority Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Significant Case Review that Esther Brown’s murder could not have been prevented.
Answer
Our thoughts continue to be with Esther Brown's family, friends and local community.
The Significant Case Review (SCR) process examines the actions and processes of the agencies involved in an individual’s management to ensure all reasonable steps were taken to minimise risk and to capture any learning. The process is independent of government and is designed to ensure the role of all partners in the process is carefully examined. We note this conclusion in this SCR and accept the two recommendations for the Scottish Government.
- Asked by: Russell Findlay, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 April 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 4 May 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking in light of the Glasgow Local Authority Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Significant Case Review relating to the murder of Esther Brown.
Answer
Public protection is paramount and the Scottish Government is committed to learning from this Significant Case Review (SCR). We have accepted the two recommendations for the Scottish Government and will take these forward with MAPPA partners as appropriate. We also attended the first of what will be regular meetings convened by the Glasgow MAPPA Strategic Oversight Group Chair with partners to consider the findings of the SCR and oversee the implementation of improvements.
- Asked by: Russell Findlay, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 03 May 2023
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 11 May 2023
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on its legal challenge to the decision of the UK Government to issue a section 35 order in relation to the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 11 May 2023
- Asked by: Russell Findlay, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 02 May 2023
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 4 May 2023
To ask the First Minister what action the Scottish Government plans to take in light of his declared support for the Daily Record’s “Our Kids … Our Future” campaign to tackle violence against young people.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 4 May 2023
- Asked by: Russell Findlay, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 30 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 27 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason it has taken several years for the Victims Surcharge Fund to raise over £1 million, in light of the Scottish National Party's 2016 manifesto having stated that the fund "will provide more than a million pounds a year of funding for practical help for victims of crime".
Answer
The amount raised by the victim surcharge is entirely dependent on the number and value of fines imposed by the courts. Only individuals or organisations who have been cautioned after the Victim Surcharge (Scotland) Regulations 2019 came into force on 25 November 2019 are affected. Such cases take time to progress through the court, and the pandemic also impacted on court capacity and therefore court disposals including fines.
An estimate that £800,000 per year could be collected in the fund after four or five years, based on collection rates at that time, was shared with the Justice Committee in October 2019.
- Asked by: Russell Findlay, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 29 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 26 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government how many prison officers there were (a) at the end of each financial year since 2016-17 and (b) on the most recent date for which data is available.
Answer
I have asked Teresa Medhurst, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service (SPS), to respond. Her response is as follows:
The numbers of prison officers employed by SPS at the end of each financial year from 2016-17 to 2022-23 are set out in the following table.
Financial year (at year end) | Number of Prison Officers employed by SPS |
2016-17 | 3370 |
2017-18 | 3342 |
2018-19 | 3294 |
2019-20 | 3242 |
2020-21 | 3302 |
2021-22 | 3381 |
2022-23 | 3331 |
- Asked by: Russell Findlay, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 29 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 26 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government whether the Scottish Prison Service’s upcoming Gender Identity and Gender Reassignment Policy will give consideration to the gender self-identification of prisoners in prisoner placement decisions.
Answer
I have asked Teresa Medhurst, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service (SPS), to respond. Her response is as follows:
The review of the Gender Identity and Gender Reassignment Policy 2014 is currently ongoing. The review is considering the suitability of the current policy’s position on self-identification, along with other potential options which would allow SPS to make safe and appropriate decisions about the placement and management of transgender people in custody.
- Asked by: Russell Findlay, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 25 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether imprisoning violent offenders is an effective method of violence reduction.
Answer
Protecting victims and the public from harm is the Scottish Government’s absolute priority.
Prison will remain a necessary option, particularly for those who pose a risk of serious harm, in removing the individual from the community and reducing the likelihood of further offending for the duration of their sentence. As reflected in our National Strategy for Community Justice, there is also clear evidence that community-based sentences can be more effective in reducing reoffending and assisting with rehabilitation than short term custodial sentences, while protecting the public and robustly managing risk.
Overall, taking an individualised approach is therefore critical. Sentencing decisions in each individual case are, of course, a matter for the independent courts to make within the legislative framework set by Parliament, taking all the relevant facts and circumstances of each case into account.