Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 29 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1439 contributions

|

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Contract (Formation and Remedies) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 25 November 2025

Jeremy Balfour

Andrew Agapiou, do you have anything to add?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Contract (Formation and Remedies) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 25 November 2025

Jeremy Balfour

Is there anything else that you would like to comment on in part 1 of the bill?

10:00  

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Contract (Formation and Remedies) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 25 November 2025

Jeremy Balfour

Colin or Andrew, do you have anything to add to that?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Contract (Formation and Remedies) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 25 November 2025

Jeremy Balfour

Do you have any specific comments on part 1 of the bill? I am sorry to start with you again, David, but do you have a particular view on the proposal to abolish the postal acceptance rule? Every first-year law student learns that rule. In the 21st century, would that be a good thing to get rid of?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Contract (Formation and Remedies) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 25 November 2025

Jeremy Balfour

Thank you. As you point out, that is probably outwith the scope of the bill, but your comments have been noted and others can consider them.

David Woods, you are the legal expert. Are you happy that parties can contract out of the provisions of the bill?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Contract (Formation and Remedies) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 25 November 2025

Jeremy Balfour

As David Woods mentioned, the bill is limited to reforming certain aspects of the law of contract and providing certain remedies for breach of contract. Do you think that the bill should be broader, or does it do enough?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Contract (Formation and Remedies) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 25 November 2025

Jeremy Balfour

Good morning, and thank you all for coming this morning. I will move us on slightly, and I will start with you, Colin Borland. What are your views on parties being able to contract out of the provisions of the bill? You mentioned that point in your written submission.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Wellbeing and Sustainable Development (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Jeremy Balfour

Good morning, Sarah. In your opening remarks you mentioned issues around public bodies, and we have heard quite a lot of evidence on that. Your bill includes references to public bodies promoting wellbeing and sustainable development. Should the bill require “delivery” rather than “promotion”?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Wellbeing and Sustainable Development (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Jeremy Balfour

We have received evidence that obligations on sustainable development

“must be fulfilled before and at the time when a particular policy is being considered or decision taken.”

How will the legislation ensure that, in practice, obligations will be met at the point of delivery?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Wellbeing and Sustainable Development (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Jeremy Balfour

I have a brief question. Did you think of using regulations, which obviously have greater legal standing, rather than guidance, or did guidance seem the best way to do it?