The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 778 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I am also interested to know where the issue is not just inflation but where there are simple cost overruns. I ask that that be included as well.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
That is what I am trying to clarify—the process behind it. As you said, decisions might be made to prioritise one area over another, and those might be perfectly reasonable priorities. However, it could be that projects are reprofiled, put on hold, slowed down or whatever in order to deliver in other areas or in areas where there is, say, an overspend or that face inflationary issues.
In relation to the £75 million and the £41 million for vessels and piers in the ferry services budget, how much of that is capital and how much of it is resource? Are you able to say? Sorry—I should have given you a little bit more notice on that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
That was for phase 1 of the small vessel replacement programme.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Okay—they are both entirely capital. I was going to ask where that sits in relation to road equivalent tariff funding but, as those are capital budgets, that would not apply.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
On a technical and process point, you have identified areas in which you can invest more or in which you need to increase capital spending. How does that process happen? How are the individual projects identified, and what are the timescales for that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Would some projects be reprofiled to allow the movement of additional capital to other projects that are facing difficulties?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Before I ask about the financial impact, I have a question about the evidence that was used in relation to the previous order. When was that research conducted?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Do you recognise how frustrating it will be for fishers whose businesses are being put on pause without there necessarily being relevant evidence for doing that? You have made a commitment to look at more ways of collecting data, but, at the moment, that is not in place. Do you understand how frustrating that will be?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
As you will be aware, the Scottish Creel Fishermen’s Federation has expressed its disappointment at the lack of exemptions. In future years, if you will not look to provide any financial support, are you more likely to consider exemptions, if you can, particularly if the scientific data improves?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Rachael’s and Rhoda’s points covered most of what I intended to say. There is a lack of data—-and a lack of data that we can have a huge amount of confidence in. There is a lack of exemptions and, generally, a lack of trust in those organisations and individuals who will be most impacted by the order. There is too much reliance on some of the anecdotal evidence, which has been highlighted. Putting people’s lives on hold, even for a short period, without supporting information—or information that we can have confidence in—is not the right approach. I will vote for the annulment, and I hope that others will, too.