The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 760 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Brian Whittle
Does the Scottish Government’s perspective anticipate any barriers in relation to its ability to secure delivery of those rights?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Brian Whittle
Yes.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Brian Whittle
I will leave it there just now, convener.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Brian Whittle
For a number of years, you and I have been around this particular crisis, which has been much talked about. In fact, one slogan that came from those watching our discussions was, “You keep talking, we keep dying.” Despite the whole Parliament’s strong desire to make significant improvement, it has not been made. Although we accept that it must be amended, could the bill be a mechanism for the significant step change that we need but have failed to realise over the past decade?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Brian Whittle
On that particular point, have we, through immigration, been using cheap labour just to keep costs down? That is my only caveat about continuing to have such immigration—that the pay level is sustained.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Brian Whittle
Perhaps I can develop that slightly. In any negotiation—and I think that we all agree that the terms and conditions of our care sector need significant improvement—there are going to be cost implications for the private and independent sectors. If there is no further investment, there will be more closures in the independent sector. Can you explain the impact that that will have on the sector as a whole?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Brian Whittle
Given that, are there any barriers in relation to the Scottish Government’s ability to secure delivery of the rights as set out in the bill?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Brian Whittle
Thank you for that. Given that the bill is at stage 1, would any amendments be required to enable its successful implementation, from a Scottish Government perspective?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Brian Whittle
I will not ask my next question, then.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Brian Whittle
That is another one of my bugbears, but I do not want to go down that rabbit hole.
I hope that, if the bill was passed—albeit in an amended fashion—it would have a positive impact by enhancing health services and forcing us to bring in the third sector in a positive way. Delivering the bill would require all the services that you have set out. Do you not think that the bill has the potential to force Governments to properly fund and invest in the whole system? That is the only way that this could work. It is scary to say that, bad as our drug deaths are, the situation could be a lot worse for all the volunteers and third sector organisations in our areas that we all know about. Is it not the case that we need to force the issue?