The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1012 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Brian Whittle
I have been looking at governance, codes of conduct, ethical standards and accountability frameworks. How does the Government plan to ensure consistent standards across all voting members? How will the Government ensure that the order encapsulates the issues around potential conflicts of interest for third sector organisations that are involved in commissioned services or individuals with lived experience who receive direct support?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Brian Whittle
That leads me on to my next point, which is on whistleblowers. Again, the issue has been raised before and every board will tell you that it has a whistleblower champion—that it has somebody that people can go to. The reality is very different. How do you change that whole culture of trying to shut down whistleblowers? It is not peculiar to one area; it exists across the whole of Scotland at the moment.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Brian Whittle
We know that there are third sector representatives who may also be commissioned providers and that there are lived experience members who may receive some of the services. What governance safeguards should be put in place for such situations? When there is a conflict, how do we make sure that there are safeguards in place for those who are sitting on the panel, so that we mitigate risk?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Brian Whittle
My concern is that there is potentially a breach of the law here, and we do not need any more of that within the health service.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Brian Whittle
You mentioned that there is no real national reporting. One of my hobby horses is the issue of data analysis and intelligence gathering. I am not sure that we do not have enough evidence, data and so on; my concern is that we are just not properly exploring what we have. Where are we with that? Is there a need to have a real think about how data is delivered and how we engage in data gathering?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Brian Whittle
On that point, there are precedents for that, even within this committee. We have substitute committee members, who receive the same training as regular members. It is the same for people in the NHS and for councillors who sit on IJBs. My only question is about whether there would be a cost implication from your members having a proxy.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Brian Whittle
There would be a training cost as well, would there not?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Brian Whittle
My point is that, if we are going to bring in that lived experience, why add to the numbers rather than replacing members?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Brian Whittle
Mr Crilly, you suggested that, if there was a conflict of interest, there would be the potential for somebody to not take part in a discussion or a vote. Who would make the decision on whether the conflict of interest merited such action?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Brian Whittle
Moving on from that, you have stipulated that part of your job is about “never again” events such as the Eljamel case—never again can that happen. However, somebody said that they are not convinced that some of the actions that should have been taken in the Eljamel case would be taken if there was a rogue surgeon right now in our health boards. Do you think that that is right? If it is not right, how do we change that confidence factor?
10:00