Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 14 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 462 contributions

|

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Human Rights (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 1 October 2024

Annie Wells

Convener, I do not have any questions this morning. Everything that I had has been answered. It has been very comprehensive.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Human Rights (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 1 October 2024

Annie Wells

We were disappointed when we received the letter and heard that the bill was not being introduced. What were your initial thoughts when you received the letter or, in Professor McHarg’s case, read the programme for government? How was the communication for you?

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Annie Wells

To ask the Scottish Government what measures it is taking to boost confidence in the retail sector. (S6O-03756)

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Annie Wells

Data from the Scottish Retail Consortium and KPMG shows that total sales in Scotland decreased by 0.5 per cent between August last year and August this year. Given that our high streets are already struggling thanks to the Scottish National Party’s failure to pass on rates relief last year, does the minister accept that more needs to be done to help the sector to deliver the economic growth that Scotland needs?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Civil Court Fees

Meeting date: 24 September 2024

Annie Wells

Good morning, everyone. I am sorry that I am not with you in person.

Most people have touched on this, but can you provide more in-depth insight into whether there are particular groups or communities that will be negatively impacted by the increase? Perhaps Aaliya can answer first.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Civil Court Fees

Meeting date: 24 September 2024

Annie Wells

In her opening remarks, Aaliya said that further research needs to be done on the impact of the fee increase on human rights. What should that research cover? Is there anything that we have not looked at yet?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Civil Court Fees

Meeting date: 24 September 2024

Annie Wells

Thank you very much for those responses.

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 19 September 2024

Annie Wells

Teachers in Glasgow are currently voting on industrial action in response to the Scottish National Party city council’s decision to cut 450 teaching posts over three years, a move that the Educational Institute of Scotland has described as “damaging and dangerous”. That comes as newly qualified teachers in the Glasgow region struggle to get jobs. Does the cabinet secretary accept that the SNP’s underfunding of councils and failure to support the teaching profession will have an irreversible impact on pupils in Glasgow?

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 19 September 2024

Annie Wells

To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to encourage teacher retention during the current academic year. (S6O-03736)

Meeting of the Parliament

Creating a Modern, Diverse and Dynamic Scotland

Meeting date: 18 September 2024

Annie Wells

Ten years ago to the day, Scots were asked whether they wanted independence or whether they wanted to remain a part of the United Kingdom. They went and voted and they chose the union. You would think that, 10 years after Scotland voted decisively to remain in the UK, SNP ministers might have finally learned to move on—even if they did not want to, in their hearts, you would think that they would realise that they needed to, in their heads.

However, today’s motion from the First Minister tells us everything that we need to know—that he represents a Government that is so out of touch with the majority of Scots. In the years since that vote, the push for another divisive independence vote has been continually pursued. That has been done despite so many urgent matters needing the attention and funding that were consumed by pursuing that vote.

After losing the first vote, the SNP looked forward to an independence bill, which went to the Supreme Court and was unanimously rejected by top judges. The SNP Scottish Government has spent more than £2 million on its obsession with independence, including publishing 13 papers on independence, one of which was entitled “Independence in a Modern World”. Presiding Officer, I do not believe that there is anything modern or forward thinking about repeatedly reopening the divisions of an independence vote that took place exactly a decade ago. Instead, I want the Scottish Government to forgo all the wasted resources that have gone towards this and redirect them towards addressing the priorities of everyday Scots.