The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5898 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Finlay Carson
In that case, I will have the pleasure of asking the last question, which is about flexibility and accountability.
You wrote to us to confirm that the Scottish ministers would lay any part 2 regulations under the affirmative procedure when the content of the regulations would make substantial change. That was the direction of my earlier question—I was asking about the difference between substantial and insignificant changes. Substantial changes require greater levels of scrutiny.
What criteria will you use to inform decisions about what is substantial and what is not? Why are those criteria not set out in the bill to give us the comfort of knowing that, as you said, Parliament will get the opportunity to fully scrutinise any substantial changes?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Welcome back. We move on to our third panel on the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill. We will take evidence on part 4 of the bill, and for this discussion I welcome Jim Fairlie, the Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity. I welcome back Leia Fitzgerald, head of the nature division bill unit at the Scottish Government, and we also have Sam Turner, team leader of the wildlife management team; Brodie Wilson, policy manager of the wildlife management team; and Hazel Reilly, solicitor, all from the Scottish Government.
We have up to 90 minutes for this evidence session. I remind everyone to try to keep questions and responses as succinct as possible, to allow us to get through all our questions.
I will kick off with a nice straightforward question, minister—you will be pleased to hear that. Section 10 of the bill updates the aims and purposes of deer management to include safeguarding the “public interest”, but that term is not defined in the bill. In an online deer practitioner meeting that was held two weeks ago, there were considerable differences of opinion on what that public interest might be. Do you intend to define the term “public interest” in secondary legislation or the code of practice?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Finlay Carson
But you just said that it would not be set out.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Okay. Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Finlay Carson
We heard concerns, especially in the south of Scotland, among the lowland deer groups, that there was a lack of resources to fully meet public interest expectations. What is your response to that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Finlay Carson
What role does the Government play in setting the agenda and scope of the advisory panels?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Finlay Carson
I think that we had another question on—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Certainly.
I have a supplementary on the proposed power. In the evidence that we have heard up to now, the NGOs have almost without exception said that the power is like a sledgehammer to crack a nut and that the flexibility already exists.
The only organisations that appear to support the Government’s introduction of this overarching power are Government organisations and public bodies. Why is it the case that all the NGOs think that the power goes way too far and that there is a lack of safeguards? You have talked about safeguarding things for the future, but we need to think about which Governments might be in place in a few years’ time and ensure that safeguards are there. Why does the Government feel that the proposed power is required but nearly every organisation other than the public bodies thinks that they are not?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Finlay Carson
The crux of the question is whether EIAs and habitats regulations should be governed by primary legislation rather than regulation.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Finlay Carson
That takes us on to a question from Evelyn Tweed.