The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6718 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
I call Emma Harper to speak to amendment 240 and other amendments in the group.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
I call the minister to speak to amendment 71 and other amendments in the group.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
I am still a bit concerned. You mentioned the advice that was given in relation to the submission in 2023. Proposed new section 6BZ is all about intervening for nature and climate objectives—surely that is exactly what that provision is about. The advice that the then minister received suggested that
“To go beyond preventing damage is a significant shift in balance between public and private interests and we could expect challenges to this proposal on European Convention on Human Rights grounds”.
Is that advice not absolutely applicable to proposed new section 6ZB, as it was to the submission back in 2023?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
I call Alasdair Allan to speak to amendment 39 and other amendments in the group.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 3, Against 6, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 132 disagreed to.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
Good morning, and welcome to the 34th meeting in 2025 of the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee. Before we begin, I ask everyone to ensure that their electronic devices are switched to silent. We have received apologies from Ariane Burgess, and we welcome to the meeting Mark Ruskell, who is attending as her substitute.
Agenda item 1 is consideration of subordinate legislation. I welcome to the meeting Mairi Gougeon, Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, Land Reform and Islands, and the following Scottish Government officials: Ashley Cook, deputy director for food and drink; Tracy McCollin, head of the good food nation team; Lisa Nowak, policy officer, good food nation team; and James Hamilton, lawyer.
I invite the cabinet secretary to make a short opening statement.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you, cabinet secretary.
This has been a long process. The good food nation has been talked about for more than a decade. This committee did a huge amount of work right at the beginning of the parliamentary session, but, sadly, we were unable to properly scrutinise the plan, given the lack of time.
In their responses to our call for views, stakeholders, including the Scottish Food Commission, have been highly critical of the SSI. There has been lots of concern around governance and accountability. Indeed, the Scottish Food Commission suggested that the SSI has
“conflated the desire for specificity with that of being narrow.”
There is, therefore, some confusion about how we have arrived where we are. Will you explain what your approach has been and, given that some functions or descriptions—for example, crofting—appear in one schedule but not in the other, is there a risk that, by including some functions but not others, there may be omissions in practice?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 7, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 223 disagreed to.
Amendment 224 moved—[Tim Eagle].
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
There will be a division.
For
Carson, Finlay (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con)
Eagle, Tim (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Allan, Alasdair (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (SNP)
Grant, Rhoda (Highlands and Islands) (Lab)
Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)
Roddick, Emma (Highlands and Islands) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Tweed, Evelyn (Stirling) (SNP)
Wishart, Beatrice (Shetland Islands) (LD)
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
You say that you tried to be comprehensive. However, one damning feature of the SSI is the policy note, which runs to just one and a half pages. I have seen SSIs that were considerably less impactful on food production but had more explanation about how the Government had arrived at its policies. Why does so little information surround this SSI, given how broad it is? One and a half pages is probably the smallest policy note that we have had in any of the legislation that the committee has considered over the past four years.
08:45