Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 7 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 5931 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 8 February 2023

Finlay Carson

I refer to some of the language that you have used, such as “decimating”. You say that 58 per cent of our sea bed is severely damaged. Where do you get that figure from? Is that 58 per cent within the 3-mile limit or within the 12-mile limit?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 8 February 2023

Finlay Carson

On some of the issues that you have covered, we could probably sit here all day and talk about that one question—it is a great question—about the co-dependencies, synergies, trade-offs and whatever. However, the Scottish Government has committed to developing a new national marine plan for Scotland by late 2025. Are you hopeful that that will cover some of the issues that Karen asked about?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 8 February 2023

Finlay Carson

Is that not a factor? It appears that you are suggesting that disturbance to the sea bed is wholly responsible for the decline.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 8 February 2023

Finlay Carson

You had a supplementary to question 8.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 8 February 2023

Finlay Carson

You talked about “facts”. What research justifies your saying that the Cameron report was wrong in relation to conservation and in saying that the removal of the limit would benefit fishing communities? What research has been done since then?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 8 February 2023

Finlay Carson

The opinion of the majority of the committee is that we should close the petition and incorporate consideration of spatial management of inshore fisheries in our future consideration of the national marine plan. If that plan comes to us as the lead committee, I assure the petitioner that we will engage extensively with all stakeholders, the petitioner and the SCFF when the opportunity arises.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 8 February 2023

Finlay Carson

Your views will be on the record.

Do members agree that we should close the petition?

Members indicated agreement.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 8 February 2023

Finlay Carson

You said that the limit was removed because it was too complicated. The Cameron report suggested that the limit was removed because it could not be justified on grounds of conservation, and it recommended the removal of the restrictions for the benefit of the fishing community.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 8 February 2023

Finlay Carson

I call Ariane Burgess.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 8 February 2023

Finlay Carson

Your petition is all about mobile gear fishing. Surely you are not suggesting that mobile gear fishing is responsible for the situation. We know that ecosystems are complex—you have said that yourself. There are lots of different effects and causes of that. There is global warming, and plankton and sand eels are becoming more abundant further north. There is a reduction in seabirds. Your petition, however, suggests that it is all down to mobile gear within a 3-mile limit. Surely that is not scientifically based—not at the moment; you are just making an assumption that we should have a blanket 3-mile ban.

You have also said yourself that there are some places where there might not need to be a 3-mile ban—on the east coast or whatever. It is either a blanket ban or it is not a blanket ban. Further to what Jim Fairlie has mentioned, is there any science to back up what you are saying?