The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5898 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Before Jamie Whittle comes in, I will ask my next question, because it relates to this point directly. It is about environmental safeguards or other limitations on the powers that are currently in the draft bill. Do we need to protect certain core aspects of regimes from being amended in secondary legislation? That ties in with some of the responses that we have just heard. Jamie, that might be one for you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
You mentioned the need to provide encouragement. How can we incentivise the transformational change that is needed? Should we use the carrot or the stick? Does the bill do that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
I apologise—you are Rob, not Bob. I should have checked that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
You said that it is hard for us to experience that. There are different priorities, are there not? It is easy to set climate change targets by looking at the levels of carbon dioxide, methane and so on, which can be measured fairly simply. Biodiversity is a completely different challenge. If we want to protect ground-nesting birds, we need to do more to address predators. When we are talking about other small mammals, we must look seriously at the impact of badgers on the environment. How on earth do we set targets that identify individual species but have a far broader impact on general biodiversity net gain?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
I think that I inadvertently opened up another line of discussion. I will jump forward and bring in Elena Whitham.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
That takes me on to a supplementary question. The consultation in 2023 said that successful targets will need to incentivise transformative change and ensure that biodiversity is mainstreamed into all levels of government. Given the past record of the Government, how will the bill achieve that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Should the bill reflect the capacity or the lack of it within some of the public bodies that need to be involved in the process? For example, Emma and others have touched on the current race for onshore as well as offshore renewables, but the capacity within local authorities to look at and review those environmental impact assessments is a massive issue. Some local authorities with the bulk of the wind farm applications have only a part-time biodiversity officer.
Should something within the bill ensure capacity within the whole chain of the EIA process to deal with it adequately? At the moment, local authorities are not able to deal with that process and applications are automatically passed to the energy consents unit to decide. That effectively bypasses some of the scrutiny and some of the local democracy. Do we need something in the bill that ensures that the process is fit for purpose and that there is capacity to deliver the right outcomes, particularly on planning applications?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
How realistic is that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
I suppose that the process can work, but the evidence right now is that it does not, because a huge number of applications bypass a whole part of that scrutiny—the local authority part—and go straight to the energy consents unit, which nobody knows about. It is a secret department within the Government. It is incredibly difficult to find out how that decision-making process works. The EIA process might be there but, if we cannot deliver it, is it fit for purpose? That is my query.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Finlay Carson
I will give Ross Ewing the right to reply. It must be short.