The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5898 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Finally, the policy memorandum states that
“there is a good degree of confidence that the policies developed will have strategic alignment”
with the EU. How important is that? Given the concerns that you raised about Europe—we have heard that the green deal has almost collapsed and there are issues with funding for nature restoration—how important is it that we have a strategy that is aligned with the EU rather than more broadly with the UN?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
I will bring in Bob Brooker.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you. That is helpful.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
That was a bit indulgent of me, because I do not know whether it relates directly to the bill, but it is interesting to hear how it might work in practice. Davy McCracken, would you like to come in on that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
On the question of whether something is robust and proportionate, does the bill make it easier for the Government to justify disregarding concerns that are raised in the EIA? Even if, at the next step, a reporter agrees that the impact is unacceptable, does it allow the Government more flexibility to say that the development’s impact is proportionate? I hope that what I am trying to say makes sense. Should campaigners who are concerned about the impact of new energy infrastructure be worried that the legislation will make it easier for the Government to disregard EIAs?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
I suppose that the big question requires a yes or a no. Does the bill address everything that needs to be addressed, or should we be looking at a consolidation bill that pulls everything together? That would be far easier to follow in order to understand where the obligations lie. Was this a missed opportunity? Should we have had a consolidation bill, or should we look for the Government delivering that over a certain timeframe?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
This is a framework bill—we are not going to try to define what a framework bill is, but it is fairly obvious that this is one—and there are always concerns about how the secondary legislation that, in effect, puts the meat on the bones is developed and what scrutiny it comes under. Does the bill as it sits now give the Parliament enough scrutiny powers to deal with that, whether the measures are negative or affirmative? Could you deal with that, Jamie, as well as responding to Emma Harper’s question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Our final question on part 1 is from Evelyn Tweed.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
The UK Energy Act 2023 already allows Scottish ministers to amend certain parts of the habitats regulations. That is in recognition of the fact that we need to develop offshore wind farms at pace and at scale, but it also affects other activities that are associated with grid connections and so on. That sort of ties in with section 3(b) and section 3(c). It is about how we get the balance right.
To give a practical example, we have recently seen a major pylon upgrade from Glenlee to Kendoon—the Tongland upgrade. There were about 1,000 objections to that—nobody was in favour of the upgrade. It went to public inquiry, and the reporter suggested that the impact of the development on biodiversity and landscape was unacceptable. However, the Scottish ministers decided that the benefits of protecting the security of the electricity supply overrode all of that, much to the disappointment of campaigners. I believe that that development will potentially go to judicial review.
Will the new legislation—section 3(b) in particular—make it easier for the Government to do that and justify potentially damaging biodiversity and landscapes? Is it likely to make it easier for them to go—as we say in here—at pace and at the scale required? Again, the issue is about protections.