The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5898 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
You said that local authorities are best placed to deal with the issue. Do they have the expertise and the capacity to make informed judgments about the appropriateness of fish farms beyond 3 nautical miles?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
We have run out of time. I thank you all for your very valued contributions this morning.
We will have a brief suspension before moving on to the next item. We will resume at 11:35.
11:26 Meeting suspended.Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
In that case, we will go to Tim Eagle first.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
We will move on to our final question, from Evelyn Tweed.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Without the evidence from an independent review on what could be most effective, how do we know that what is done is right?
We have just finished considering parts 1 and 2 of the bill, and a lot of the discussion was on review reporting targets, but it appears that national parks do not have to undertake reviews on an independent basis—again, they are marking their own homework. Another area in Scotland is potentially being designated as a national park, and one of the big issues that we see there is a lack of confidence that national parks are actually delivering. If an independent review had been undertaken at some point, the benefits, or otherwise, would be clear and transparent.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Before we move away from the subject of national parks, I want to touch on what is not in the bill in that regard. Everyone will be aware of the controversy about the potential designation of a national park in Galloway. There is concern about how the decision that Galloway would be the sole contender for that designation was arrived at, and the lack of transparency about or understanding of how we got to that point. There is nothing in the legislation that sets out the route for an area to be identified as a candidate for a national park.
Whichever side of the argument people are on—whether they are pro or anti national parks—I do not think that there is any doubt that the process has been a car crash that has caused a lot of division. There are many polarised views. Ultimately, the process has totally derailed what should have been a very positive experience and one that was similar to the experience 25 years ago, when the first designations took place. At the weekend, we heard from stakeholders that 300 or 400 businesses got very actively involved in setting up the Cairngorms national park, and we heard how businesses, individuals and communities played a massive part in that. With the proposed Galloway national park, that has been completely absent.
There has not been a clear indication of what the proposed national park would be. Should there be something in legislation to make clearer the Government’s obligations to ensure that the process to designate new national parks is more engaging and contains more information? One of the problems is that there is a massive vacuum in relation to how the new national park might look. We are always told that Galloway is an area of intensive forestry, intensive farming and intensive renewables, which is unlike any other national park in the world. We are told that it will be different, but not in what way. Should the legislation on national parks have contained more direction on future policy on the designation of parks, given the mess that the current process is in?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
When we had farmer stakeholders here, we heard that there is a sense of complete inertia when it comes to forming policy. You sit on a biodiversity forum. The agriculture reform implementation oversight board was described as a fig leaf for doing nothing. Will we see plans being developed at the pace that we know is needed? Will co-design be part of this, or, ultimately, will we just not make the progress that we need?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Emma Harper, do you have any further questions?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Jamie, do you want to come in?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
David, you are saying that you do not want to come in on that, as it has been covered. The next question is from Mark Ruskell.
11:30