The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5931 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Finlay Carson
On that point, what if a business’s decision is not to take up single farm payments, or any payments?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Finlay Carson
How do we then regulate for net zero?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Finlay Carson
Again, I will bring the focus back to the rural support plan. Currently, the legislation suggests that agricultural, forestry, rural land use, the environment and the climate change plan need to be considered within the rural support plan, but it does not mention the cost of food or the good food nation approach. It would appear that you are suggesting that that should be mentioned in it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Finlay Carson
Yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Finlay Carson
Okay. Thank you. Rachael, I think that you have a question on a different topic. I will bring you in as long as it is very brief and we get yes or no responses.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Finlay Carson
We will move on to some of the other objectives of the agricultural policy, with questions from Kate Forbes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Finlay Carson
No—it is my opinion. Thanks, Alasdair.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 December 2023
Finlay Carson
Thank you, convener. First, I should probably declare an interest as a species champion for the native oyster bed. I am in the unique position of being a species champion who can actually eat the species that he is trying to protect, and I enjoy the odd one, I must admit. This morning, we have heard about crowded seas and marine spatial squeeze. We are now seeing a policy squeeze, with crowded ministerial responsibilities. One reason why I am here today is that there is still a fluffy idea of who takes responsibility.
We have discussed marine issues in our committee, particularly the lack of fit-for-purpose data. How much is actually collected properly, and how much is modelled? That is a concern. We saw clearly from the Bute house agreement-driven Clyde cod box debacle, that embarrassing situation in which Marine Scotland officers tried to defend inadequate data in order to change policy, that there are issues there. From the rural affairs point of view, we understand that creating a biodiversity-positive marine environment is of critical importance, but we cannot forget the socioeconomic impact of policies; that is equally important. Arguments are often made without touching on the positive or negative aspects of socioeconomic impact, because they sometimes just do not fit the narrative of the groups or organisations that are trying to promote a particular point of view.
In agriculture, rural land use partnerships bring all the stakeholders together and are supposed to look at landscape-scale policies and the impact that they have across the board. I was surprised that no one touched on regional inshore fisheries groups, which are supposed to be the groups in which fishermen and stakeholders can give their input and comment on policies. Does that suggest that the Government is not serious about engaging with the fishing industry through those regional inshore groups? As far as I can see, they are inadequately funded and not really fit for purpose. Could I have your comments specifically on whether regional inshore fisheries groups have a role in ensuring that we can have a biodiversity plan that works for biodiversity and for fishing communities?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 December 2023
Finlay Carson
The delivery plan does not appear to be costed, and you have touched on an equivalent of a financial memorandum. However, it is very ambitious. It is a bit like the Agriculture and Rural Communities (Scotland) Bill in that it is very ambitious, there are no boundaries to it and we do not know how much it will cost. Do we need to be more pragmatic going forward? Ambition is good, but not if you cannot deliver on your ambitions and if there are targets that cannot possibly be met. There is an argument that climate change targets are far too ambitious and that we need to be more pragmatic. Does this plan need to be more pragmatic to deliver effectively?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Finlay Carson
I am delighted that you suggested that the committee should take that role, because it was discussed last week whether the Parliament should have a role in scrutinising the rural action plan, given its importance, and in ensuring that it is adequate to deliver the Government’s vision. Thank you for that—that was going to be my next question.