The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7345 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Just on that, I note that you mentioned the lag effect. Turning that on its head, I assume that that means that, if we do not plant more trees now, we risk making future carbon budgets more difficult, because of the lag period. When we look at the draft climate change plan, the CCC’s recommendations and the budget together, do we not see a policy delivery mismatch in that these ambitions are not backed by the resources that the industry feels it needs in order to address the lag and that give the industry the confidence to invest?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
I am sorry, Ariane, but—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
We will now move on to our section on peatland. My question is on the targets and what we have achieved up to now. We have a baseline that assumes that 12,000 hectares will be restored in 2025-26, which is set out in the five-year peatland action programme, which was published last December. To that, we can add the 90,000 hectares that have been restored to date. However, it does not appear that the increasing rate of restoration by 10 per cent each year up to 2030, and maintaining levels after that, will reach the target of 400,000 hectares by 2040. Will you explain that discrepancy?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
We still have two or three questions to go, and I am conscious that we are rapidly running out of time.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
You can come back briefly on that, Mike, and I will then open up the question a little bit more.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Who would like to kick off? The proposed three-year period raises concerns about whether any interim measures will be brought forward on the back of some of the work that has been done.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Ariane Burgess, would you like to come back with the question that you started to ask in the previous set of questions?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
I will ask a supplementary question that is political. Is this situation typical of the Government, which wants to be everybody’s friend and is unwilling to make the really hard decisions, based on the science, that are going to annoy some people?
We have heard previously that one of the reasons that the Government excluded everyone was to ensure that there was no discrepancy, or a drop-off in the markets, for boat-based nephrops fishing. That then saw creelers benefit from their competition being excluded.
The idea was to say, “Let’s just ban everyone, so we’re not pitching fishermen against fishermen.” Ultimately, however, if the science suggests that the biggest impact on the cod population in the Clyde is bycatch from nephrops fishing, the Government needs to take the bull by the horns and do something about that. It needs to support the nephrops business and incentivise gear innovation and different types of fishing while ensuring that the sector does not lose out. However, the Government is just not willing to do that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Elaine, do you think that tailored, controlled exemptions should be considered as part of this tool, given the impact on fishing businesses that are excluded?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
You can respond to that, Rea, and then we will move on.