The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5898 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Would anyone else like to come in? Everybody is looking at the desk in front of them.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Finlay Carson
The implication is that that is not implicit and that it needs to be—if I am reading between the lines correctly.
We will move on to part 3, on national parks.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Finlay Carson
We have heard that some of the planning applications are quite complex and resource intensive, but we also heard from one local authority that believed that, as you have stated, they will not all come along at once but will start to come in gradually and slowly.
However, it is our understanding that the applications are not processed on a full cost recovery basis, which might put financial strains on local authorities. If more applications were to come forward, would the Scottish Government increase fees to allow for full cost recovery or, at least, put in place some mechanism to ensure full cost recovery?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you. I call Beatrice Wishart.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Finlay Carson
That brings our questions to an end. Thank you very much, Mr Triscott, for joining us this morning.
We now move to formal consideration of the instrument. I invite the minister to move motion S6M-17363.
Motion moved,
That the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee recommends that the Town and Country Planning (Marine Fish Farming) (Scotland) Amendment Order 2025 [draft] be approved.—[Ivan McKee]
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Does any member wish to debate the motion?
As no member wishes to debate the motion, is the committee content to recommend approval of the instrument?
Members: No.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Finlay Carson
There will be a division.
For
Carson, Finlay (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con)
Grahame, Christine (Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale) (SNP)
Grant, Rhoda (Highlands and Islands) (Lab)
Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)
Tweed, Evelyn (Stirling) (SNP)
Whitham, Elena (Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley) (SNP)
Wishart, Beatrice (Shetland Islands) (LD)
Against
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Finlay Carson
The committee will report on the outcome of the instrument in due course, and I invite the committee to delegate authority to me, as convener, to finalise the report for publication. Are we agreed?
Members indicated agreement.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Finlay Carson
What are Brendan Callaghan’s views on how Scottish forestry or commercial forestry in general might evidence ecosystem health now and how that might be improved in the future? We have heard in previous evidence sessions about the lack of data on ecosystems and biodiversity in forestry. How could a target on ecosystem health affect Scottish forestry?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Is there a risk that we could end up with an endless list, with the focus then on the things that were excluded from the list rather than those that were on it? You could argue that indigenous species or indigenous populations should be protected or that there should be a focus on sustainable economic regeneration or development. Those things are included in other bullet points but they are not specifically set out in the bill. I apologise to any planners who are watching, but we know what planners are like. Could having what appears to be a hierarchy of objectives lead to unintended outcomes? Katherine Leys, is that possible? I presume that the shrug of your shoulders suggests that that could be a possibility.