The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7345 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Emma Harper has a question for both Kenneth MacNab and Sean McIlwraith.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
The last item on our agenda is consideration of a negative instrument: the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 (Agricultural Products) (Consequential Amendment) (Scotland) Regulations 2025 (SSI 2025/407). Do members have any comments to make on the instrument?
As no members have any comments to make on the instrument, that concludes our proceedings in public.
13:01
Meeting continued in private until 13:26.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Good morning, and welcome to the fourth meeting of the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee in 2026. Before we begin, I ask everyone to ensure that their electronic devices are switched to silent.
The first item on the agenda is consideration of whether to take item 6 in private. Do members agree to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
You say that there has been lots of legislation. However, since the plan was updated in 2020, legislation has been introduced but none of it has been used; indeed, most of the legislation in the 2024 act is not being used. We are also legislating for legacy common agricultural policy schemes.
We are now in 2026 and emissions are 20 per cent higher than the level that we thought that they would be back in 2020. Moreover, we heard from Vera Eory that the Scottish Government’s draft plan will leave agricultural emissions significantly higher than the path that had been advised.
You say that you are building a strong foundation, but there is no evidence of that at all, particularly given that we have just had a budget that shows a drop in direct payments. How on earth are we going to pull this back and support agriculture to get anywhere near where the Climate Change Committee suggests we should be?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Could you explain that point to me?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
We have touched on the reliance on meeting the 45 per cent voluntary uptake target. If that is not achievable, one of our previous witnesses suggested that there needed to be a “credible policy threat” that would have, in the long term, an impact—for example, financially—and would affect pricing policy. Should that level of uptake not be reached, are you considering some form of taxation or emissions trading in the future?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Many witnesses have said that there is no clarity on the actions that are needed in agriculture and that farmers and crofters are not clear about what they need to do. Some have stated that farmers and crofters have been promised future rewards but that those are not materialising. We have heard about innovation—Emma Harper’s question was all about that—but, for example, the cost of electric tractors is two or three times more than that of their normal counterparts, as is the case for tractors that are powered by biofuels or hydrogen. Given that the budget is declining year on year, how can we get early adopters, who are critical to driving innovation, to have the confidence that their investments will pay? Will there be future increases in funding to allow those early adopters to take on some of the new technology?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Are you suggesting that some of the predictions on the adoption of new technology will not be financially driven or potentially financially supported by the Government?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Clarity is one thing that many of the witnesses say simply does not exist. There is no clarity, and that sits alongside a decreasing budget.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Finlay Carson
I am a bit concerned by Mr Kerr’s comments that the Government feels that it has any place to defend agriculture. The Government’s job is to ensure that we have sustainable food production and food security and to deliver on its commitments in the climate change plan. I know that the cabinet secretary disagrees but, across the sector, whether that is non-governmental organisations, small or big farmers, the NFU Scotland or the Scottish Agricultural Organisation Society, there is universal condemnation of the lack of clarity on future agricultural policy.
On the back of the Agriculture and Rural Communities (Scotland) Act 2024, Jonnie Hall said that it was “two years too late”, it was “pretty bland” and that it
“lacks the obvious detail which farmers and crofters need now if they are to plan for and implement change.”
There are real concerns about agriculture, but the cabinet secretary seems to be the only one who disagrees with that.